The unzipped distribution contains some unnecessary files that I
weeded out of the webapp -- demos, tests, etc. But the deployed
webapp (which just contains the library files) still weighs in at
4.3mb, so you can start to see the savings when multiple apps in the
same server share the same copy.
BTW how big are the DOJO files?
-dain
On 9/19/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK based on discussion here on the dev list and in GERONIMO-2333 I
just committed the code for GERONIMO-2406 into trunk rev 447903. This
introduces the Dojo files as a new webapp into the server and creat
Paul,
It looks like you might be having the same problem that I initially had
where my commits didn't show up on the geronimo-scm list (at least I
haven't seen your referenced commit appear on the list yet).
You need to get somebody to add your apache id to the -allow list for
[EMAIL PROTECT
OK based on discussion here on the dev list and in GERONIMO-2333 I
just committed the code for GERONIMO-2406 into trunk rev 447903. This
introduces the Dojo files as a new webapp into the server and creates
a dependency from the console onto this app so that Chris can
reference it from the JMX De
I agree that would be a great if Dojo was more closely aligned with
the ASF. Earlier this year when the Apache incubator accepted an AJAX
project called Kabuki[1] I sent a note to the Dojo list asking about
their involvement with Kabuki and the ASF[2]. The president of the
Dojo Foundation, Alex
Wouldn't it be best to, if Dojo is going to be a
separate "module" to actually see if they would
consider it being an ASF project? Other ASF
projects other than Geronimo would have great
use for it.
On Sep 14, 2006, at 2:45 AM, Christopher M. Cardona wrote:
Gianny,
Thanks again for finding tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I use dojo on a day to day basis to develop a e-commerce webapp. One
feature that I make heavy usage of is the builder which packages up a
lot of separate js file dependencies, widget templates and widget css
files into a single obfuscated, compressed
Gianny,
Thanks again for finding time to look at the patch. Sorry to hear that
it didn’t worked out smoothly in Safari. I agree with you that we should
find a better way to include/checkin Dojo in G. I decided to include the
Dojo source in the patch to make it easier for people like you who wa
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the info. Dojo is licensed under Academic Free License and
BSD so I think it should be fine. The only decision now is how to
include Dojo in Geronimo. A couple of suggestions were given by Gianny
and Paul and everybody is definitely welcome for additional input.
Best wish
Paul McMahan wrote:
Gianny, I agree that the JMX Viewer portlet Chris has contributed is
fantastic and more people should take a look at it! I also agree that
we should think about how the Dojo files are checked in -- directly in
the console vs. as a separate module. I was thinking about creat
Gianny, I agree that the JMX Viewer portlet Chris has contributed is
fantastic and more people should take a look at it! I also agree that
we should think about how the Dojo files are checked in -- directly in
the console vs. as a separate module. I was thinking about creating a
separate web ap
Hi Chris,
The JMX Viewer portlet is finally working for me. Actually, it seems
that due to a Dojo known issue, this portlet does not work with
Safari :(; having said that, it works really nicely, and I really
mean really nicely, with IE.
Regarding your patch, I believe that this is a larg
Not from the ZPMC...
Chris, if its a BSD/ASL license, it's likely fine.
Jeff
Christopher M. Cardona wrote:
> I’m sending this email to officially ask the PMC what they think about
> including Dojo Toolkit in Geronimo. Last month Paul already started a
> thread on the devlist
> (http://www.mail-a
Hi Dims,
Thanks for the quick reply. Sorry I didn't know that. If that's the case
then I would like to officially ask the community so we can make a final
decision and move forward.
Best wishes,
chris
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Chris,
the PMC does not take technical decisions.
thanks,
dims
Chris,
the PMC does not take technical decisions.
thanks,
dims
On 9/12/06, Christopher M. Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm sending this email to officially ask the PMC what they think about
including Dojo Toolkit in Geronimo. Last month Paul already started a
thread on the devlist
(http:
I’m sending this email to officially ask the PMC what they think about
including Dojo Toolkit in Geronimo. Last month Paul already started a
thread on the devlist
(http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg29777.html) that
discussed this idea. A couple of people replied to this thr
16 matches
Mail list logo
