Yes, that helped.
Thanks alot, David!
Vasily
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 8:50 PM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This email helped. Was able to find and fix the issue. It also turns
> out at least for mac anyway, that this issue happens only when you are
> *online* but without intern
On Mar 6, 2008, at 12:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
This email helped. Was able to find and fix the issue. It also
turns out at least for mac anyway, that this issue happens only when
you are *online* but without internet or java.sun.com access. If
you are offline in the true sense of the
This email helped. Was able to find and fix the issue. It also turns
out at least for mac anyway, that this issue happens only when you are
*online* but without internet or java.sun.com access. If you are
offline in the true sense of the word, it doesn't try to connect.
Anyway, it should
Kevan,
Here, I've reproduced the problem with a simple test. It works ok if
proxy is set appropriately and fails if not, as it tries to download
the http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd and fails.
The stack is generally the same as for Geronimo/OpenEJB/SjAS:
java.net.ConnectException: Connect
> I just tested using Daytrader. I turned off wireless and unplugged ethernet.
> I was able to deploy without a problem. I wonder if this problem could be
> specific to Windows?
Maybe, I'll check that. Another chance may be that's something about
my SjAS DDs.
> Could you provide the entire stack
On Mar 1, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Vasily Zakharov wrote:
I have no idea what's going on with it. It really ticks me off as
that's the kind of feature you should have to enable in a parser not
disable.
Is it? I thought the engine should first check if the necessary scheme
is present locally and onl
> I have no idea what's going on with it. It really ticks me off as
> that's the kind of feature you should have to enable in a parser not
> disable.
Is it? I thought the engine should first check if the necessary scheme
is present locally and only try download if no local copy is present.
Isn
On Feb 29, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Vasily Zakharov wrote:
Hi, all,
I'm once again trying to couple SPECjAppServer2004 with Geronimo, now
version 2.1, and one of the problems I observe is:
Issue OPENEJB-700 that is now closed as it was fixed in OpenEJB v3.0b2
that is used in G2.1, seems to be still
Hi, all,
I'm once again trying to couple SPECjAppServer2004 with Geronimo, now
version 2.1, and one of the problems I observe is:
Issue OPENEJB-700 that is now closed as it was fixed in OpenEJB v3.0b2
that is used in G2.1, seems to be still actual for some reason. On
G2.1 I still can't deploy SjA
