Hi,
Just spot it while working with issues in XBean and Geronimo Devtools
JIRAs that Geronimo RTC Workflow Scheme v2 is still in use. I meant to
change it to Default (None?), but the note - "Note: It is recommended
to backup JIRA data before proceeding with the workflow association.&qu
I didn't figure there wasn't any harm in allowing the RTC system to
be used for more than what is currently required by PMC mandate. I
mean if someone really wants to have their work reviewed, more power
to them.
We can change it back if you prefer.
-David
On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Gui
Howdy, AFAIK documentation is not affected by RTC.
Cheers!
Hernan
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Issues can be moved to new types, e.g. Wish -> Improvement, IIUC. Does
RTC really cover documentation? I thought that it was for improvements
and new features.
Regards,
Alan
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I
They can be moved, unless they do not have the same workflow afaik.On 8/7/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Issues can be moved to new types, e.g. Wish -> Improvement, IIUC.
Does RTC really cover documentation? I thought that it was for
improvements and new features.
Reg
Issues can be moved to new types, e.g. Wish -> Improvement, IIUC.
Does RTC really cover documentation? I thought that it was for
improvements and new features.
Regards,
Alan
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think that dblevins changed that, because in XBean, I
had a "Wish" for which i provided a p
I think that dblevins changed that, because in XBean, I had a "Wish" for which i provided a patch but was unableto put it in RTC mode. RTC should also be applied to documentation, so why were these issue types excluded
from the workflow ?I think the main problem is that you can not easily recatego
Previously, this was set up so that only new features and improvements
followed the RTC flow. Now, this new scheme includes all issue types.
Does anyone know why this was changed?
Regards,
Alan
