Re: JPA in geronimo

2007-02-28 Thread Lasantha Ranaweera
Thanks folks ... So we have to find otherway to replace default JPA provider class name I think. I would be thankful if somebody please review GERONIMO-2899 JIRA patch too and let me know the status. :) Thanks Again, Lasantha > On Feb 28, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: > >> On 2/28/

Re: JPA in geronimo

2007-02-28 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Feb 28, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 2/28/07, Lasantha Ranaweera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For the JPA side I think now we need not hard coded openjpa JPA provider class name. Am I correct David (Is there any situations where both CMP and JPA comes together)? As far

Re: JPA in geronimo

2007-02-28 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On 2/28/07, Lasantha Ranaweera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For the JPA side I think now we need not hard coded openjpa JPA provider class name. Am I correct David (Is there any situations where both CMP and JPA comes together)? As far as I understand the spec, ear can contain CMPs and JPA enti

Re: JPA in geronimo

2007-02-28 Thread Lasantha Ranaweera
Hi David J & Dain, Thank you very much for you guys information. According to the Dain's information I have created a JIRA issue (GERONIMO-2899) & submitted a patch. It will now only create "cmp" if there is cmp information found in the ejb-jar.xml (please note it will create only one cmp).