Message-
From: Sachin Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 7:34 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [wtp-dev] Proposal for Merging Server Runtime and Server
Instance
So hopefully this will make sense... :)
In the two proposal notes I sent, the discussion is around
Sachin, can you translate this from eclipse speak to geronimo speak?
-dain
On Mar 1, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Please respond with any comments or concerns you have with this
second proposal as it will have a direct affect on G tooling.
- sachin
Begin forwarded message:
So hopefully this will make sense... :)
In the two proposal notes I sent, the discussion is around the 3
concepts in WTP, runtimes, servers, and facets and what we can
do to improve the definition, design and interaction between the
frameworks that these concepts represent. So for those
The proposal sounds good to me, but I don't think I'm really
qualified to pass any real judgment on tooling. I would like to know
what you think of the proposal. I'd also like to know if it adds
extra constraints to the Geronimo server.
-dain
On Mar 1, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Sachin Patel
I think it will simplify things greatly from a users perspective so
I'm all for it. It will also give us a whole lot more flexibility.
We'll be able to create the server instance when the runtime is
created so that means less user input. Also we currently add the
entire runtime to every
