thanks Guillaume

When I added the version so:

      <plugin>
        <groupId>org.mortbay.jetty</groupId>
        <artifactId>maven-jetty6-plugin</artifactId>
        <version>6.0.0beta17</version>
        <configuration>
          <scanIntervalSeconds>10</scanIntervalSeconds>
 
<webAppSourceDirectory>${basedir}/src/webapp</webAppSourceDirectory>
        </configuration>
      </plugin>

to service-console pom.xml, and the service-web pom.xml, I got a successful
build (at least eclipse project artifacts generation anyway!)

thanks
David

-----Original Message-----
From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 8:59 AM
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: build failure with latest source: maven-jetty6-plugin

This plugin is available on public repos, so you may try again to run maven
until is successfully download all the needed dependencies.
See
http://repo.mergere.com/maven2/org/mortbay/jetty/maven-jetty6-plugin/6.0.0be
ta17/

Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

On 6/16/06, David Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> With the latest src from here:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/
>
> and with maven 2.0.4 doing a
>
> mvn eclipse:eclipse
>
> in the root folder, I am having a build problem so:
>
> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> [INFO]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- [INFO] The plugin 'org.mortbay.jetty:maven-jetty6-plugin' does not 
> exist or no valid version could be found
>
> I've grabbed
>
> maven-jetty6-plugin-6.0.0beta9.jar
>
> manually, and placed it with that name and also as
>
> maven-jetty6-plugin.jar
>
> into my m2 repository at this location:
>
> .m2\repository\org\mortbay\jetty\maven-jetty6-plugin
>
> The build failure persists. Anyone else having / had this problem? I'm 
> not so familiar with maven2 so maybe I'm confused ... but I assume the 
> code should build from subversion, and I'm following the instructions 
> from
> here:
>
> http://www.servicemix.org/site/building.html
>
> Any help much appreciated
>
> thanks
>
> David Black
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0146416/
>
>
>

Reply via email to