An alternative here would be using commonJ. Although 237 will be the
eventual J2EE standard for this it is only just getting started and will
almost certainly depend on the JSR 166 APIs (which use generics) that are
integrated into J2SE 5. 237 is unlikely to be substantially different to
common
now your thoughts!!
Thanks,
Rahul
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 3:41 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo and JSR-237 WorkManager API for App Servers
Well, I think implementing this would be great. I&#
@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo and JSR-237 WorkManager API for App Servers
On Jun 22, 2005, at 4:04 PM, Tyagi, Rahul wrote:
>
> Hello Team!!
>
> Recent version of leading app servers are supporting "JSR-237 Work
> Manager for Application Server". I believe JSR-237 is simpl
All,
If you plan on pursuing this, I'd like to contribute.
-- Thomas Fuller
--- "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2005, at 4:04 PM, Tyagi, Rahul wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello Team!!
> >
> > Recent version of leading app servers are
> supporting "JSR-237 Work
> > Manage
On Jun 22, 2005, at 4:04 PM, Tyagi, Rahul wrote:
Hello Team!!
Recent version of leading app servers are supporting "JSR-237 Work
Manager for Application Server". I believe JSR-237 is simple and
powerful API for writing robust parallel processing application for
managed environment. Prio
ould start using my personal
email ID for this email list.
Thanks,
Rahul
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 3:40 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo and JSR-237 WorkManager API for App Servers
On Wed, 22 Jun 2
dnesday, June 22, 2005 3:40 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo and JSR-237 WorkManager API for App Servers
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Tyagi, Rahul wrote:
> ...
> I think JSR-237 is a major step in writing scalable parallel processing
> application within managed environment.
I saw only a very early draft of this JSR, which IMO had the fatal
defect of not explaining the semantics of transactions when using the
thread pool. Has the current version of the spec added any discussion
of transactions?
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 22, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Tyagi, Rahul wro
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Tyagi, Rahul wrote:
> ...
> I think JSR-237 is a major step in writing scalable parallel processing
> application within managed environment.
Can you give us some more detail on what JSR-237 requires from the app
server?
Also, the footer block below needs to go! :)
Thanks,
