Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-05-03 Thread Gianny Damour
Not at all. I am now back from holiday and I am simply waiting for this week-end to check-in these changes. Thanks, Gianny On 03/05/2007, at 1:58 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Sorry man, I've not had any time to look into this... its still on my list though ;-) --jason On Apr 3, 2007, at 6:4

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-05-02 Thread Jason Dillon
Sorry man, I've not had any time to look into this... its still on my list though ;-) --jason On Apr 3, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: Hi, As discussed with Jason, I worked on a fix to this problem: GERONIMO-3059. I will be on holiday, with sporadic internet access, for a coupl

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-04-03 Thread Jason Dillon
I will take a peek at GERONIMO-3059 and provide some feedback. Thanks :-) --jason On Apr 3, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: Hi, As discussed with Jason, I worked on a fix to this problem: GERONIMO-3059. I will be on holiday, with sporadic internet access, for a couple of weeks

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-04-03 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, As discussed with Jason, I worked on a fix to this problem: GERONIMO-3059. I will be on holiday, with sporadic internet access, for a couple of weeks starting tomorrow night; So, I will not check in these changes now as I will not be able to support related problems, if any. Having

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-03-20 Thread Sachin Patel
I agree, this is a usability regression. -sachin On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: You have to wait several seconds for the bootstrap kernel to load... just to display the cli usage... that seems wrong IMO.

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-03-20 Thread Jason Dillon
On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:42 AM, Gianny Damour wrote: In the meantime... can anyone tell me why we are booting up a kernel before cli parsing? From what has congealed in my head so far... this is for access to the repository for classloading of bootstrap classes. Is there any other reason why

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-03-20 Thread Gianny Damour
On 20/03/2007, at 6:12 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I briefly looked into adding this... but looks like a lot of the bootstrap plumbing has changed. I'm a bit bewildered as to why we are booting up a temporary kernel before we get to command-line option parsing. I'm also a bit mystified as to

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-03-19 Thread Jason Dillon
I briefly looked into adding this... but looks like a lot of the bootstrap plumbing has changed. I'm a bit bewildered as to why we are booting up a temporary kernel before we get to command-line option parsing. I'm also a bit mystified as to why option parsing is now spread over several c

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Sounds good. On Feb 26, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone mind if I re-write org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon to use commons-cli to handle option processing? Use of commons-cli 1.0 add ~30k to the bootstrap classpath (uses commons-lang, which is already there), and will gr

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Makes since. It sucks we the help can't list them as separate options, but it is good enough as is. -dain On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Say what? Will -v, -vv and -vvv stop working? If yes, then I don't think we shou

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Say what? Will -v, -vv and -vvv stop working? If yes, then I don't think we should switch as what we have is currently working fine. -dain On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: I don't believe there is anything which prevents the syntax from being the same... except, that the

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Say what? Will -v, -vv and -vvv stop working? If yes, then I don't think we should switch as what we have is currently working fine. Sorry, perhaps I was unclear before. -v, -vv will continue to work (-vvv didn't work before, but will st

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
I don't believe there is anything which prevents the syntax from being the same... except, that the '-vv' and '-v' options end up merging into one '-v' option, which can be specified more than one to increase verbosity, so the usage of '-vv' is the same, but technically there would be no '-

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I don't care as long as you don't change the cli syntax. IIRC the code originally used commons cli, but someone removed it because it wasn't flexible enough. It was a very long time ago, so my memory is fuzzy. -dain On Feb 26, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone mind if I re-wr

Re: org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon and commons-cli

2007-02-27 Thread Sachin Patel
Sounds good 2 me. -sachin On Feb 26, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone mind if I re-write org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon to use commons-cli to handle option processing? Use of commons-cli 1.0 add ~30k to the bootstrap classpath (uses commons-lang, which is already ther