Sweet!
Thanks,
-dain
On Jul 24, 2007, at 6:00 PM, David Jencks wrote:
see GERONIMO-3344.
Following years of urging from activemq/jencks/servicemix and more
recent urging from openejb I finally split off the tx and connector
modules into bits that implement the functionality w/o geronimo
On Jul 25, 2007, at 4:00 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
So, looks okay from a initial peep through, though a few things I
noticed right off the bat...
There is no pom.xml in the top-level tree under https://
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk, and
there should be.
I will take a look. We should prolly start using the remote-resources stuff.
Will peep at it tomorrow.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:37:45
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Transaction and Connector jars untied from g
I wont be able to review until my vacations are over, but the idea is
really good. Thanks a lot David!
On 7/25/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
see GERONIMO-3344.
Following years of urging from activemq/jencks/servicemix and more
recent urging from openejb I finally split off the tx
So, looks okay from a initial peep through, though a few things I noticed
right off the bat...
There is no pom.xml in the top-level tree under
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk, and
there should be. And the children modules should use that pom as their
parent.
see GERONIMO-3344.
Following years of urging from activemq/jencks/servicemix and more
recent urging from openejb I finally split off the tx and connector
modules into bits that implement the functionality w/o geronimo fluff
and geronimo integration jars.
The functional bits are now under
Sounds like positive direction. +1
I'm about to go out for dinner now, but I will review the bits in the
components/* tree later tonight or tomorrow.
Cheers,
--jason
On Jul 24, 2007, at 6:00 PM, David Jencks wrote:
see GERONIMO-3344.
Following years of urging from
