Re: Warning regarding Windows file path lengths with JDK 1.4

2006-01-11 Thread Jacek Laskowski
2006/1/11, John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Do people think that the above workarounds are acceptable and it isn't worth trying to shorten our file paths? Hi, Certainly, it's not worth its time, imho. As you wrote we can't do much to work it out, and the only feasible solutions are just

Re: Warning regarding Windows file path lengths with JDK 1.4

2006-01-11 Thread Joe Bohn
Can we recommend a maximum path size for Windows when unpacking the zip and/or installing from the installer? If so, it might be helpful for windows users and avoid some unnecessary problems. We should be able to come up with a general recommendation for the install location and

Re: Warning regarding Windows file path lengths with JDK 1.4

2006-01-11 Thread Paul McMahan
I'm not sure which scenarios are failing due to this JDK bug but perhaps in some cases we could take advantage of the 8.3 version of the filenames that are automatically generated on Windows referring to the long filenames. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8.3 Again, not being sure which

Re: Warning regarding Windows file path lengths with JDK 1.4

2006-01-11 Thread Jason Dillon
Sounds reasonable to me... Though you left out the last contingency... Which is to go get a Mac ;-) --jason -Original Message- From: John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:29:31 To:dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Warning regarding Windows file path lengths

Re: Warning regarding Windows file path lengths with JDK 1.4

2006-01-10 Thread John Sisson
Mapping the file name would reduce the length a bit, but i am wondering if it is really worth the complexity for the small gain in reduction of characters in the file path. For users on JDK 1.5_06 (where the JDK bug is fixed), there are still some related issues that I found after further

Re: Warning regarding Windows file path lengths with JDK 1.4

2006-01-10 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On 1/10/2006 5:29 PM, John Sisson wrote: Mapping the file name would reduce the length a bit, but i am wondering if it is really worth the complexity for the small gain in reduction of characters in the file path. For users on JDK 1.5_06 (where the JDK bug is fixed), there are still some

Re: Warning regarding Windows file path lengths with JDK 1.4

2006-01-08 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Sisson wrote, On 1/7/2006 10:46 PM: FYI.. We need to be careful of resulting file path lengths on Windows when creating web applications that may result in long file paths in Geronimo due to a JDK 1.4 bug (

Warning regarding Windows file path lengths with JDK 1.4

2006-01-07 Thread John Sisson
FYI.. We need to be careful of resulting file path lengths on Windows when creating web applications that may result in long file paths in Geronimo due to a JDK 1.4 bug ( http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6182812) that has only been fixed in JDK 1.5_06. Fom reading the bug