Re: svn commit: r486967 - /geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml

2006-12-14 Thread jason . dillon
Np I realized why several hours after I mailed that. --jason -Original Message- From: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:21:33 To:dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r486967 - /geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml You can put them back not t

Re: svn commit: r486967 - /geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml

2006-12-14 Thread Dain Sundstrom
You can put them back not that we released. The "modules" stuff only effects build time so having them in the released pom doesn't matter. -dain On Dec 13, 2006, at 9:50 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Huh? Why were modules removed to make a release? That is not really valid IMO. --jason On

Re: svn commit: r486967 - /geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml

2006-12-13 Thread Jason Dillon
Huh? Why were modules removed to make a release? That is not really valid IMO. --jason On Dec 13, 2006, at 9:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: dain Date: Wed Dec 13 21:36:27 2006 New Revision: 486967 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=486967 Log: Update to genesis 1.1