Thanks Rex. Makes sense.
I guess that's consistent with our treatment of server-security-config
dependencies, but I'm not convinced we're handling them correctly. Pretty
certain that we can build alternate assemblies with the same basic problem...
--kevan
On Mar 24, 2010, at 5:40 AM,
Yes, I agree. How about merge server-security-config car into
j2ee-security(actually I think we should rename the car as server-security)?
Will open a jira to track this.
2010/3/24 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
Thanks Rex. Makes sense.
I guess that's consistent with our treatment of
