[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-6868) Upgrade test-dependencies (Joda Time 2.12.7 + Jackson 2.17.0)

2024-04-28 Thread Richard Zowalla (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Richard Zowalla closed GERONIMO-6868. - Resolution: Abandoned > Upgrade test-dependencies (Joda Time 2.12.7 + Jackson 2.1

Re: [PR] BATCHEE-191 - Test with TomEE 10 (EE10) + TomEE 9.1 (EE9.1) [geronimo-batchee]

2024-04-19 Thread via GitHub
rzo1 merged PR #26: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/26 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@geronimo.apa

[PR] Test with TomEE 10 (EE10) + TomEE 9.1 (EE9.1) [geronimo-batchee]

2024-04-16 Thread via GitHub
rzo1 opened a new pull request, #26: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-batchee/pull/26 TCK for EE10 + JBatch Unit Tests are "ok" with it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to th

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6868) Upgrade test-dependencies (Joda Time 2.12.7 + Jackson 2.17.0)

2024-04-16 Thread Richard Zowalla (Jira)
Richard Zowalla created GERONIMO-6868: - Summary: Upgrade test-dependencies (Joda Time 2.12.7 + Jackson 2.17.0) Key: GERONIMO-6868 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6868 Project

[GitHub] [geronimo-yoko] habiblawal1 closed pull request #2: Port poa test: AdapterActivatorServer Test

2023-09-11 Thread via GitHub
habiblawal1 closed pull request #2: Port poa test: AdapterActivatorServer Test URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-yoko/pull/2 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

[GitHub] [geronimo-yoko] habiblawal1 opened a new pull request, #2: Port poa test: AdapterActivatorServer Test

2023-09-11 Thread via GitHub
habiblawal1 opened a new pull request, #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-yoko/pull/2 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe,

[GitHub] [geronimo-xbean] LuciferYang commented on pull request #37: [XBEAN-340] Fix test failed of `JarArchiveTest#testXBEAN337`

2023-03-28 Thread via GitHub
LuciferYang commented on PR #37: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/37#issuecomment-1487840174 Thanks @rmannibucau ~ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific c

[GitHub] [geronimo-xbean] rmannibucau merged pull request #37: [XBEAN-340] Fix test failed of `JarArchiveTest#testXBEAN337`

2023-03-28 Thread via GitHub
rmannibucau merged PR #37: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/37 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@geronim

[GitHub] [geronimo-xbean] LuciferYang commented on pull request #37: [XBEAN-340] Fix test failed of `JarArchiveTest#testXBEAN337`

2023-03-28 Thread via GitHub
LuciferYang commented on PR #37: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/37#issuecomment-1486472228 @rmannibucau Perhaps due to different Java versions or test environments, both exceptions may be thrown. Agree with your suggestion and I change the code to catch both

[GitHub] [geronimo-xbean] rmannibucau commented on pull request #37: [XBEAN-340] Fix test failed of `JarArchiveTest#testXBEAN337`

2023-03-28 Thread via GitHub
rmannibucau commented on PR #37: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/37#issuecomment-1486455009 With your run sure but wonder why it passes on master - maybe another jvm validating the url handler (im afk to check right now). So Im not againt your change but if it passes fo

[GitHub] [geronimo-xbean] LuciferYang commented on pull request #37: [XBEAN-340] Fix test failed of `JarArchiveTest#testXBEAN337`

2023-03-28 Thread via GitHub
LuciferYang commented on PR #37: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/37#issuecomment-1486450095 https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/blob/e40b760ffe7e36a50c5a524395e84fffc46f07aa/xbean-finder/src/main/java/org/apache/xbean/finder/archive/JarArchive.java#L50-L97 I de

[GitHub] [geronimo-xbean] LuciferYang commented on pull request #37: [XBEAN-340] Fix test failed of `JarArchiveTest#testXBEAN337`

2023-03-28 Thread via GitHub
`commit e40b760ffe7e36a50c5a524395e84fffc46f07aa (HEAD -> trunk, origin/trunk, origin/HEAD) ` and this test fail exists in both environments, the error is the same as what I wrote in the pr description. I did not find a more detailed log. -- This is an automated message from

[GitHub] [geronimo-xbean] rmannibucau commented on pull request #37: [XBEAN-340] Fix test failed of `JarArchiveTest#testXBEAN337`

2023-03-28 Thread via GitHub
rmannibucau commented on PR #37: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/37#issuecomment-1486416184 Hi @LuciferYang , built master yesterday and all was green so looks like this change hides a bug, can you detail the error you hit please? -- This is an automated message from th

[GitHub] [geronimo-xbean] LuciferYang opened a new pull request, #37: [XBEAN-340] Fix test failed of `JarArchiveTest#testXBEAN337`

2023-03-27 Thread via GitHub
LuciferYang opened a new pull request, #37: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-xbean/pull/37 Run `mvn clean install`, `JarArchiveTest#testXBEAN337` there will be test failed as follows: ``` [ERROR] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.039 s

[GitHub] [geronimo-arthur] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #11: Bump hsqldb from 2.5.1 to 2.7.1 in /integration-test/src/test/resources/integration-tests/openjpa

2023-01-06 Thread GitBox
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #11: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-arthur/pull/11 Bumps hsqldb from 2.5.1 to 2.7.1. [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=org.hsqldb:hsqldb&package-

[GitHub] [geronimo-arthur] dependabot[bot] closed pull request #4: Bump sshd-core from 2.3.0 to 2.7.0 in /integration-test

2022-05-14 Thread GitBox
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #4: Bump sshd-core from 2.3.0 to 2.7.0 in /integration-test URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-arthur/pull/4 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [geronimo-arthur] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #4: Bump sshd-core from 2.3.0 to 2.7.0 in /integration-test

2022-05-14 Thread GitBox
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #4: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-arthur/pull/4#issuecomment-1126664570 Looks like org.apache.sshd:sshd-core is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, pl

[GitHub] [geronimo-arthur] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #4: Bump sshd-core from 2.3.0 to 2.7.0 in /integration-test

2022-05-11 Thread GitBox
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #4: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-arthur/pull/4 Bumps [sshd-core](https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd) from 2.3.0 to 2.7.0. Changelog Sourced from https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/master/CHANGES.md";>sshd-core's changelog

[GitHub] [geronimo-jwt-auth] rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #6: JsonPatch test success

2021-01-22 Thread GitBox
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/6#discussion_r562495571 ## File path: src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/tck/jaxrs/JsonPatchTest.java ## @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +/* + * Licensed to

[GitHub] [geronimo-jwt-auth] dabloem commented on a change in pull request #6: JsonPatch test success

2021-01-22 Thread GitBox
dabloem commented on a change in pull request #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/6#discussion_r562450126 ## File path: src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/tck/jaxrs/JsonPatchTest.java ## @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the

[GitHub] [geronimo-jwt-auth] dabloem commented on a change in pull request #6: JsonPatch test success

2021-01-21 Thread GitBox
dabloem commented on a change in pull request #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/6#discussion_r562009097 ## File path: src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/tck/jaxrs/JsonPatchTest.java ## @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the

[GitHub] [geronimo-jwt-auth] rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #6: JsonPatch test success

2021-01-21 Thread GitBox
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/6#discussion_r561699745 ## File path: src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/tck/jaxrs/JsonPatchTest.java ## @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +/* + * Licensed to

[GitHub] [geronimo-jwt-auth] rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #6: JsonPatch test success

2021-01-21 Thread GitBox
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/6#discussion_r562252320 ## File path: src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/tck/jaxrs/JsonPatchTest.java ## @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +/* + * Licensed to

[GitHub] [geronimo-jwt-auth] dabloem commented on a change in pull request #6: JsonPatch test success

2021-01-21 Thread GitBox
dabloem commented on a change in pull request #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/6#discussion_r562188132 ## File path: src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/tck/jaxrs/JsonPatchTest.java ## @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the

[GitHub] [geronimo-jwt-auth] rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #6: JsonPatch test success

2021-01-21 Thread GitBox
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/6#discussion_r562048161 ## File path: src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/tck/jaxrs/JsonPatchTest.java ## @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +/* + * Licensed to

[GitHub] [geronimo-jwt-auth] dabloem commented on a change in pull request #6: JsonPatch test success

2021-01-21 Thread GitBox
dabloem commented on a change in pull request #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/6#discussion_r562009097 ## File path: src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/tck/jaxrs/JsonPatchTest.java ## @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the

[GitHub] [geronimo-jwt-auth] rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #6: JsonPatch test success

2021-01-21 Thread GitBox
rmannibucau commented on a change in pull request #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/6#discussion_r561699745 ## File path: src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/microprofile/impl/jwtauth/tck/jaxrs/JsonPatchTest.java ## @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +/* + * Licensed to

[GitHub] [geronimo-jwt-auth] dabloem opened a new pull request #6: JsonPatch test success

2021-01-20 Thread GitBox
dabloem opened a new pull request #6: URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-jwt-auth/pull/6 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

[GitHub] [geronimo-metrics] rotty3000 closed pull request #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test

2019-12-01 Thread GitBox
rotty3000 closed pull request #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/1 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log

[GitHub] asfgit merged pull request #11: Updated cyclifRef test case to reproduce a stack overflow issue, …

2019-02-05 Thread GitBox
asfgit merged pull request #11: Updated cyclifRef test case to reproduce a stack overflow issue, … URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/11 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

[GitHub] j4fm opened a new pull request #11: Updated cyclifRef test case to reproduce a stack overflow issue, …

2019-02-04 Thread GitBox
j4fm opened a new pull request #11: Updated cyclifRef test case to reproduce a stack overflow issue, … URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/11 …as an example only. This test case causes a stack over flow exception

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6685) Basic integration test for maven plugin

2019-01-20 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau resolved GERONIMO-6685. -- Resolution: Fixed > Basic integration test for maven plu

[GitHub] asfgit merged pull request #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions

2019-01-20 Thread GitBox
asfgit merged pull request #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions

2019-01-20 Thread GitBox
rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455849587 Oki, created GERONIMO-6684 and GERONIMO-6685 for this PR and applied it

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6685) Basic integration test for maven plugin

2019-01-20 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA)
Romain Manni-Bucau created GERONIMO-6685: Summary: Basic integration test for maven plugin Key: GERONIMO-6685 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6685 Project: Geronimo

[GitHub] deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions

2019-01-19 Thread GitBox
deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455810868 Well good ideas for the future, I suggest to merge this one and enhance it later as I'd like to focus on improving

[GitHub] rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions

2019-01-19 Thread GitBox
rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455808498 Was more thinking reusing our own code, potentially with a validate new service if you feel it can be reusable

[GitHub] deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions

2019-01-19 Thread GitBox
deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455778387 @rmannibucau yeah that's easy by using a validator. ``` com.reprezen.kaizen.oasparser.OpenApi3Parser parser

[GitHub] rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions

2019-01-18 Thread GitBox
rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455532866 @deki I'm fine like that but thought I would ask you if you want to unmarshall the json to check some of its

[GitHub] deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions

2019-01-18 Thread GitBox
deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455531354 @rmannibucau of course, you are right. I've added a script for

[GitHub] rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions

2019-01-18 Thread GitBox
rmannibucau commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455499337 @deki Hmm, i dont see where is the test validating the output of the invoker

[GitHub] deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions

2019-01-18 Thread GitBox
deki commented on issue #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3#issuecomment-455491054 @rmannibucau I've just resolved conflicts, would be great if you could merg

[GitHub] deki opened a new pull request #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions

2018-12-21 Thread GitBox
deki opened a new pull request #3: add integration-test for maven-plugin, update some versions URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-openapi/pull/3 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

[GitHub] rmannibucau commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test

2018-11-29 Thread GitBox
rmannibucau commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/1#issuecomment-442836211 @rotty3000 hello Raymond, think we fixed that, can you confirm when you have a few sec

[GitHub] rotty3000 commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test

2018-08-31 Thread GitBox
rotty3000 commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/1#issuecomment-417678990 .. wish I had the knowledge to implement that. I think it's the only failing thing in this up

[GitHub] rotty3000 commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test

2018-08-31 Thread GitBox
rotty3000 commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/1#issuecomment-417671342 ok right, I think this test is specifically checking that. This is an

[GitHub] rotty3000 commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test

2018-08-30 Thread GitBox
rotty3000 commented on issue #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/1#issuecomment-417464878 I'm not really expecting this for merge. I'm more looking for help to resolve the failing test. Maybe someone can fetch the branch

[GitHub] rotty3000 opened a new pull request #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test

2018-08-30 Thread GitBox
rotty3000 opened a new pull request #1: reproduce simplified failing TCK test URL: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-metrics/pull/1 I'm having an issue with this TCK test so I replicated it without the container. But I'm not sure what's going wrong. I think the algorith

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6605) cannot pass MP-Config 1.3 TCK test CDIPropertyNameMatchingTest

2018-05-04 Thread JIRA
Raymond Augé created GERONIMO-6605: -- Summary: cannot pass MP-Config 1.3 TCK test CDIPropertyNameMatchingTest Key: GERONIMO-6605 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6605 Project

[GitHub] geronimo pull request #1: Whitespace commit to test PR emails.

2018-02-23 Thread cthistle
Github user cthistle closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/geronimo/pull/1 ---

[GitHub] geronimo pull request #1: Whitespace commit to test PR emails.

2018-02-23 Thread cthistle
GitHub user cthistle opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/geronimo/pull/1 Whitespace commit to test PR emails. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/apache/geronimo cthistle-test-PR Alternatively you can

Re: Reading microprofile-config.properties from a WAR file in an Arquillian test

2017-11-30 Thread Mark Struberg
02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > SW respect what you do bit agree it lack a classes metainf api shortcut. > > Isnt an adpater bug once well placed? > > Le 30 nov. 2017 19:16, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > And that doesn't work either for GConfig at least (grante

Re: Reading microprofile-config.properties from a WAR file in an Arquillian test

2017-11-30 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
SW respect what you do bit agree it lack a classes metainf api shortcut. Isnt an adpater bug once well placed? Le 30 nov. 2017 19:16, "John D. Ament" a écrit : And that doesn't work either for GConfig at least (granted, this is an arquillian test against a WAR file on Weld, so

Re: Reading microprofile-config.properties from a WAR file in an Arquillian test

2017-11-30 Thread Mark Struberg
weld still doesn't handle this? LieGrue, strub > Am 30.11.2017 um 19:16 schrieb John D. Ament : > > And that doesn't work either for GConfig at least (granted, this is an > arquillian test against a WAR file on Weld, so I'm not sure if there's > classloader b

Re: Reading microprofile-config.properties from a WAR file in an Arquillian test

2017-11-30 Thread John D. Ament
And that doesn't work either for GConfig at least (granted, this is an arquillian test against a WAR file on Weld, so I'm not sure if there's classloader behavior at play here either). Do I just need to check to see if I can getResource("META-INF/microprofile-config.propertie

Re: Reading microprofile-config.properties from a WAR file in an Arquillian test

2017-11-30 Thread John D. Ament
? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn > > > 2017-11-30 19:05 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > > I have the following deployment used in an Arquillian test: > > > > @Deployment > > public static WebArchiv

Re: Reading microprofile-config.properties from a WAR file in an Arquillian test

2017-11-30 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
ing deployment used in an Arquillian test: > > @Deployment > public static WebArchive createDeployment() { > String propertyName = SimpleGetApi.class.getName()+"/mp-rest/url"; > String value = getStringURL(); > return Shr

Reading microprofile-config.properties from a WAR file in an Arquillian test

2017-11-30 Thread John D. Ament
I have the following deployment used in an Arquillian test: @Deployment public static WebArchive createDeployment() { String propertyName = SimpleGetApi.class.getName()+"/mp-rest/url"; String value = getStringURL(); return ShrinkWrap.create(WebArc

Re: svn commit: r1804397 - in /geronimo/components/config/trunk: ./ impl/ impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/

2017-08-09 Thread Mark Struberg
interesting notes: >> >> - If I remove Provider support, it generally works. However, I suddenly get >> duplicate beans of type Provider, which is confusing (but probably because >> of the alternative flag). >> - I can get everything to pass in Weld, and 1 test fai

Re: svn commit: r1804397 - in /geronimo/components/config/trunk: ./ impl/ impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/

2017-08-09 Thread John D. Ament
ng (but probably > because of the alternative flag). > - I can get everything to pass in Weld, and 1 test failure in in OWB with > the following: > > - Set alternative = false > - Remove Provider from the types > - Remove the filter on types to check if class. > - Change getId to use a

Re: svn commit: r1804397 - in /geronimo/components/config/trunk: ./ impl/ impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/

2017-08-08 Thread John D. Ament
ng to pass in Weld, and 1 test failure in in OWB with the following: - Set alternative = false - Remove Provider from the types - Remove the filter on types to check if class. - Change getId to use all of the types (makes a better toString) If we can figure out the alternative issue with OWB, we&

Re: svn commit: r1804397 - in /geronimo/components/config/trunk: ./ impl/ impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/

2017-08-08 Thread John D. Ament
he/geronimo/config/cdi/ConfigExtension.java > > > > geronimo/components/config/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ConfigInjectionBean.java > > > > geronimo/components/config/trunk/impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/ProviderTe

Re: svn commit: r1804397 - in /geronimo/components/config/trunk: ./ impl/ impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/

2017-08-08 Thread Mark Struberg
omponents/config/trunk/impl/pom.xml > > geronimo/components/config/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ConfigExtension.java > > geronimo/components/config/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ConfigInjectionBean.java > > geroni

Re: svn commit: r1804397 - in /geronimo/components/config/trunk: ./ impl/ impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/

2017-08-08 Thread John D. Ament
gt; > geronimo/components/config/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ConfigInjectionBean.java > > geronimo/components/config/trunk/impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/ProviderTest.java > geronimo/components/config/trunk/pom.xml > > Modified

[jira] [Closed] (YOKO-482) Fix gc bug in test

2017-02-28 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YOKO-482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed YOKO-482. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Joseph Chacko > Fix gc bug in t

[jira] [Created] (YOKO-482) Fix gc bug in test

2017-02-19 Thread David Jencks (JIRA)
David Jencks created YOKO-482: - Summary: Fix gc bug in test Key: YOKO-482 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YOKO-482 Project: Yoko - CORBA Server Issue Type: Bug Security Level

Re: [jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6537) openejb-core missing conf/deployments.xml causing test failure

2015-03-11 Thread Zhi Xie
created GERONIMO-6537: >> --- >> >> Summary: openejb-core missing conf/deployments.xml causing >> test failure >> Key: GERONIMO-6537 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6537 >&

Re: [jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6537) openejb-core missing conf/deployments.xml causing test failure

2015-03-11 Thread Zhi Xie
As I know, it should be compiled with jdk1.6. Please double check it. Thanks. 2015-03-10 4:56 GMT+08:00 Martin Gainty (JIRA) : > Martin Gainty created GERONIMO-6537: > --- > > Summary: openejb-core missing conf/deployments.xml ca

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6537) openejb-core missing conf/deployments.xml causing test failure

2015-03-09 Thread Martin Gainty (JIRA)
Martin Gainty created GERONIMO-6537: --- Summary: openejb-core missing conf/deployments.xml causing test failure Key: GERONIMO-6537 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6537 Project

Re: IMPORTANT: Major Confluence Upgrade Coming Soon. Please review test instance now.

2013-07-01 Thread Jarek Gawor
:56 AM > Subject: IMPORTANT: Major Confluence Upgrade Coming Soon. Please > review test instance now. > To: p...@apache.org, gene...@incubator.apache.org > > > [PMCs please forward to your dev list ; Incubator Mentors please forward to > your Podling dev list. > Note that th

Fwd: IMPORTANT: Major Confluence Upgrade Coming Soon. Please review test instance now.

2013-06-20 Thread Jarek Gawor
bject: IMPORTANT: Major Confluence Upgrade Coming Soon. Please review test instance now. To: p...@apache.org, gene...@incubator.apache.org [PMCs please forward to your dev list ; Incubator Mentors please forward to your Podling dev list. Note that this message may be received twice as it will al

[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-6420) test

2012-12-05 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan closed GERONIMO-6420. -- Resolution: Invalid > test > > > Key: GERONIMO-6420 >

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6420) test

2012-12-04 Thread srikanth (JIRA)
srikanth created GERONIMO-6420: -- Summary: test Key: GERONIMO-6420 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6420 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6407) Reenable restful-test project for testsuite testing

2012-11-20 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Forrest Xia resolved GERONIMO-6407. --- Resolution: Fixed commit to 1411999@3.0 branch > Reenable restful-t

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6407) Reenable restful-test project for testsuite testing

2012-11-20 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
Forrest Xia created GERONIMO-6407: - Summary: Reenable restful-test project for testsuite testing Key: GERONIMO-6407 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6407 Project: Geronimo

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-5456) Update testsuite to fix the failures and add new test cases

2012-06-15 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
work now. > Update testsuite to fix the failures and add new test cases > --- > > Key: GERONIMO-5456 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5456 >

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6364) jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException

2012-06-13 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
9684 > jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException > > > Key: GERONIMO-6364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6364 > Project: Geronimo >

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6364) jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException

2012-06-12 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
e corresponding entry in Geronimo deployment descriptor is missing. org.apache.geronimo.jaxws.test.GreeterImpl@1563133c PostConstruct Not sure if we need to address them. > jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException >

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6364) jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException

2012-06-12 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Forrest Xia resolved GERONIMO-6364. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Test case passes now, wait for tck results

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6364) jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException

2012-06-12 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
Now we should be able to read WSDL/catalog file correctly. > jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException > > > Key: GERONIMO-6364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/j

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6364) jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException

2012-06-11 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
9097 > jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException > > > Key: GERONIMO-6364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6364 > Project: Geronimo >

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6364) jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException

2012-06-11 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
9095 > jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException > > > Key: GERONIMO-6364 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6364 > Project: Geronimo >

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6356) RollBack tests failured for jms-test testsuite

2012-06-11 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
. > RollBack tests failured for jms-test testsuite > -- > > Key: GERONIMO-6356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6356 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug >

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6356) RollBack tests failured for jms-test testsuite

2012-06-11 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
> RollBack tests failured for jms-test testsuite > -- > > Key: GERONIMO-6356 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6356 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Assigned] (GERONIMO-6364) jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException

2012-06-11 Thread Ivan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan reassigned GERONIMO-6364: -- Assignee: Ivan > jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostExcept

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6316) Couldn't start web-forward-ear from test case we-forward sucessfully after deployed it.

2012-06-08 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
ear from test case we-forward sucessfully after > deployed it. > --- > > Key: GERONIMO-6316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6316 >

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6364) jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException

2012-06-08 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
Forrest Xia created GERONIMO-6364: - Summary: jaxws-catalog-tests test failed for UnknownHostException Key: GERONIMO-6364 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6364 Project: Geronimo

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6316) Couldn't start web-forward-ear from test case we-forward sucessfully after deployed it.

2012-06-08 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
is change. > Couldn't start web-forward-ear from test case we-forward sucessfully after > deployed it. > --- > > Key: GERONIMO-6316 > URL: https

[jira] [Assigned] (GERONIMO-6316) Couldn't start web-forward-ear from test case we-forward sucessfully after deployed it.

2012-06-08 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Forrest Xia reassigned GERONIMO-6316: - Assignee: Forrest Xia (was: Tina Li) > Couldn't start web-forward-ear f

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6316) Couldn't start web-forward-ear from test case we-forward sucessfully after deployed it.

2012-06-08 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
n't start web-forward-ear from test case we-forward sucessfully after > deployed it. > --- > > Key: GERONIMO-6316 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/ji

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6355) No LoginModules configured for test-cms-realm happened for jca-cms-tests testsuite

2012-06-08 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
revision 1347937@3.0-beta, Committed revision 1347943@trunk > No LoginModules configured for test-cms-realm happened for jca-cms-tests > testsuite > -- > > Key

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6355) No LoginModules configured for test-cms-realm happened for jca-cms-tests testsuite

2012-06-07 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
No LoginModules configured for test-cms-realm happened for jca-cms-tests > testsuite > -- > > Key: GERONIMO-6355 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6356) RollBack tests failured for jms-test testsuite

2012-05-22 Thread Tina Li (JIRA)
Tina Li created GERONIMO-6356: - Summary: RollBack tests failured for jms-test testsuite Key: GERONIMO-6356 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6356 Project: Geronimo Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6355) No LoginModules configured for test-cms-realm happened for jca-cms-tests testsuite

2012-05-20 Thread Tina Li (JIRA)
Tina Li created GERONIMO-6355: - Summary: No LoginModules configured for test-cms-realm happened for jca-cms-tests testsuite Key: GERONIMO-6355 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6355

[jira] [Reopened] (GERONIMO-6316) Couldn't start web-forward-ear from test case we-forward sucessfully after deployed it.

2012-05-09 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Forrest Xia reopened GERONIMO-6316: --- > Couldn't start web-forward-ear from test case we-forward sucessfully after &g

[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-6214) Geronimo Test Suite :: Test Servlet Forwarding :: EAR fail

2012-05-08 Thread Saphen Qiu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saphen Qiu closed GERONIMO-6214. Closing this issue for duplication. > Geronimo Test Suite :: Test Serv

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6214) Geronimo Test Suite :: Test Servlet Forwarding :: EAR fail

2012-05-08 Thread Saphen Qiu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saphen Qiu resolved GERONIMO-6214. -- Resolution: Duplicate > Geronimo Test Suite :: Test Servlet Forwarding :: EAR f

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-5879) A simple blueprint test case to verify if geronimo server supports blueprint application

2012-05-07 Thread Forrest Xia (JIRA)
test case first, but not sure if you ever noticed that there are some test cases in aries-testsuite which are already using blueprint, so we won't accept this case for duplicated reason. > A simple blueprint test case to verify if geronimo server supports blueprint >

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-5879) A simple blueprint test case to verify if geronimo server supports blueprint application

2012-05-07 Thread Tina Li (JIRA)
s in advance! > A simple blueprint test case to verify if geronimo server supports blueprint > application > > > Key: GERONIMO-5879 > URL: htt

[jira] [Assigned] (GERONIMO-5879) A simple blueprint test case to verify if geronimo server supports blueprint application

2012-05-07 Thread Tina Li (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tina Li reassigned GERONIMO-5879: - Assignee: Tina Li > A simple blueprint test case to verify if geronimo server suppo

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >