thoughts ?-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
,Guillaume Nodet
-parameters-tf2104691.html#a5800707
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
?You can find it herehttp://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/1_1/pom.xml.proposed
I'd like to confirm the scm and dist sections are correct.Any other errors / comments welcome.Thanks!-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
The mailing lists have been created, now.So everyone should be able to join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]On 8/12/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done, see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-910
On 8/11/06, Guillaume Nodet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:It seems
?If it loaded the dependency, the classes should be there(e.g. it works if deployed to a real server).If it didn't load the
dependency, why didn't it get a missing dependency error?Thanks, Aaron-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
/server/branchesAnd then update the pom's in server/trunk to reflect the new locationfor scm tags.--jason-- Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
further expanding.
- Grant M.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Build-problems-with-SerivceMix-tf2109810.html#a5839421
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
to his
technical contributions to Geronimo. Alan has been active in Geronimo for many years and has helped not only to help in Geronimo directly but in related efforts like Ode, Yoko and others.
Give it up for Alan :) The Apache Geronimo PMC-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
and now it's a Geronimo
PMC ticket. Good job Guillaume! I'll keep an eye on you to figure out
how you manage your time and are doing your fabolous contributions.
I never sleep. That' s my secret ;)
Congrats!
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
PMC for their
blessing to ship this release officially.
Here's my +1
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
information in dot files? I personally prefer something like
xbean-directive.xml so that when I jump into a directory I can plainly
see what kind of shenanigans are going on. Just a thought.
Regards,
Alan
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
unlikely.
Regards,
Alan
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:55:32
To:xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Colossus dot files
Not sure. If you have to put such a file in the deploy dir, it may
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
+1
On 8/19/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that we should move the XBean Jira notifications to the new
XBean dev list. Any objections?
Regards,
Alan
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
And svn notifiations too i guess.
On 8/19/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that we should move the XBean Jira notifications to the new
XBean dev list. Any objections?
Regards,
Alan
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2336
Regards,
Alan
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Is it even possible as xbean is under geronimo in the svn tree ?
On 8/19/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then we should create a list xbean-scm.
Regards,
Alan
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
And svn notifiations too i guess.
On 8/19/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Do you plan to work on the implementation too ?
On 8/19/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's kinda out of date. I'll check my stuff in.
Regards,
Alan
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The spec is currently in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/jaspi-spec/
On 8/19/06
it too?
Why not? +1
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
)
--jason
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
could explain how,
I'd be happy to do it.
--jason
On Aug 20, 2006, at 1:25 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
+1
Could we do the same for the confluence site at
http://geronimo.apache.org/xbean/ ?
What's the way to do that ?
On 8/20/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/20/06
On 8/20/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 20, 2006, at 1:37 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
specs/trunk/pom.xml
specs/trunk/artifactId
specs/tags/artifactId-version
specs/branches/
I guess I missed something, but what's the difference compared to the
current
I raised an issue at INFRA ...
On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jira notifications created.
Guillaume, what did you do to get a list created?
Regards,
Alan
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
+1 to JIRA
+1 to create svn list
-dain
On Aug 19, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Guillaume Nodet
to take a look at the new spec...
On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish that I had time. I read the spec this weekend and it looks kinda
interesting. Are you working on it?
Regards,
Alan
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Do you plan to work on the implementation too ?
On 8/19/06
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
/browse/GERONIMO-2336
Regards,
Alan
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
the template.
--jason
On Aug 20, 2006, at 1:38 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On 8/20/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is not a m2 site, its the export from Confluence... and I
imagine that we want to keep it that way.
We can however change the theme on that site to match
.
Anyone else have any thoughts about this?
Thanks,
Aaron
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Laskowski wrote:
On 8/20/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you folks want me to apply the m2 site changes to xbean and
publish it too?
Why not? +1
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Done.
See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=433122view=rev
I have also began to write an implementation of the AuthConfigFactory.
I will try to check it in somewhere soon, though the real work is on
the providers,
not the factory ;)
On 8/21/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have
is to do most of the work in the tm module.
but I might change my mind at any time.
thanks
david jencks
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Checked in at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/geronimo-jaspi/
On 8/21/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done.
See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=433122view=rev
I have also began to write an implementation of the AuthConfigFactory.
I will try to check
the JSR181 container into doing more than it is
best suited?
P
On 8/21/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I fully agree to simplify the annotations used,
if you begin to map parameters to properties or xml content,
you end up to jsr181 component.
I have already planned to add
can track where we are going :)
P
On 8/21/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do think we agree ;)
The only thing i meant, was that this new component should focus on:
* messaging style (asynchronous)
* xml payload
* closer to jbi
whereas jsr181 is good for web service
;
}
@Join(steps = { receiveService1, receiveService2 })
@Answer()
public void answer() {
// Do something with answer1 and answer2
return new Message()
}
}
On 8/21/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I fully agree to simplify the annotations used,
if you
}
}
The premise being that if you have a async reply then you need to be stateless?
P
On 8/21/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is something i'd like to be able to do.
This is really pseudo code, and some kind of beanflow oriented annotations.
This service would simply send
that if you have a async reply then you need to be
stateless?
P
On 8/21/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is something i'd like to be able to do.
This is really pseudo code, and some kind of beanflow oriented
annotations.
This service would simply send two concurrent
Yeah, it sounds better.
On 8/21/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I prefer we don't use a plural for a module or package name, so how
about we call the module xbean-classloader?
-dain
On Aug 20, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Should the xbean-classloaders module have
to get a updated
layout that allows use to use the same theme across sub-projects
the main site.
* * *
Take a peek and let me know what you folks think.
--jason
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
reading your response I tried firefox it
worked as it should. Some more IE oddities I guess.
Also, clicking on JavaDocs takes me out of the theme
completely and doesn't really show javadoc.
I did not alter the links, I just ported from the previous site.
--jason
--
Cheers,
Guillaume
).
There is also one JIRA in RTC about the classloader module, so
if people could vote on it ... Or should be delay it until next release ?
Another problem is that we will need a release of the genesis stuff ...
Thoughts ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 8/22/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should release 3.0 asap.
The remaining todos are:
* xbean 2.6 release
* jencks 1.3 release (dependant on xbean)
How far off are these two?
Jencks should be release as soon
)
at org.apache.geronimo.plugin.MojoSupport.execute(MojoSupport.java:52)
... 18 more
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
only overrides the environmnet
tag, and not the module one.
On 8/22/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently experienced some problems [1] when building Geronimo 1.1
plugins using
the car-maven-plugin.
I think a solution may
On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I was misunderstood.
I' m using the maven 2 plugin in trunk to build a plugin for Geronimo 1.1.
This is the only way, because there is no maven 2 plugin for G 1.1.
Everything was working fine until this recent change.
If this stuff
,
Klaus.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-in-servicemix-jms-with-WebSphereMQ-tf2141329.html#a5910358
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 8/22/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I was misunderstood.
I' m using the maven 2 plugin in trunk to build a plugin for
Geronimo 1.1.
This is the only way, because
;
environment xmlns=http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/
deployment-1.2
Btw, I' m wondering why the PlanProcessorMojo only overrides the
environmnet
tag, and not the module one.
On 8/22/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 8/22/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think any problem with the deployer can be avoided by specifying the
correct set of dependencies and configuration info in the project POM
(to force it to use only 1.1 JARs/CARs
valid properties will be skipped.
Note that the Content-Type property has been renamed to MimeContentType
so that mime streams can still be sent.
[..]
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-in-servicemix-jms-with-WebSphereMQ-tf2141329
. Was
this resolved?
-brian
Brian ONeill
Technical Architect, Gestalt LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
215.588.6024 (m)
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Engineering JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure Phone: (614) 244-2564 Guillaume Nodet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To
dev@geronimo.apache.org08/22/2006 10:08 ccAMSubject
Re: Car pluginPlease respond to[EMAIL PROTECTED]
he.orgOn 8/22/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/22/06
will be skipped.
Note that the Content-Type property has been renamed to
MimeContentType
so that mime streams can still be sent.
[..]
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-in-servicemix-jms-with-WebSphereMQ-tf2141329.html#a5926623
Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: On 8/22/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/22/06, Guillaume Nodet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I think any problem with the deployer can be avoided by specifying thecorrect set of dependencies and configuration info in the project POM
(to force
location, /devtools/maven-plugin/geronimo-1.x/car-maven-plugin
(any better idea ?)and that we release this plugin at the same time that the 1.1.1 is out.Thoughts ?-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
by
tomcat? I was looking at the source code for this task. It doesn't seem to
support it.
Lei
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DeployServiceAssemblyTask-Problem%21%21%21-tf2146958.html#a5927719
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
trying to fix this problem.
If will disable geronimo module until the plugin works again.
[..]
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Exceptions-in-servicemix-jms-with-WebSphereMQ-tf2141329.html#a5928806
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum
22, 2006, at 8:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: The car-maven-plugin is used as part of the geronimo build in G 1.2
. This plugin is also very usefull to build Geronimo plugins targeted to G 1.1, but has recently changed in a *slight* incompatible way. However, I think that:
* it may be difficult
was suggesting.Forking the plugin to make it usable *now* on G 1.1.I will begin the backport now.
--jasonOn Aug 22, 2006, at 8:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The car-maven-plugin is used as part of the geronimo build in G 1.2. This plugin is also very usefull to build Geronimo plugins targeted to G 1.1, but has
On 8/22/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: If you really want to use a m2 plugin for G 1.1, then I suggest someone port the m2 plugin to use G 1.1 artifacts and then add the plugin module to the
1.1 branch... make it work and then be done
are ? It would be a good fit, as the G pluginswill need it.
On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Thats fine with me... just put it into branches/1.1... no need to have a separate tree under devtools for this. How / when
of the plugin.Do you volunteer do release the full geronimo server, just to include a plugin,which would btw not be included in the distribution itself ?
I'd prefer to keep this code in our tree and in the 1.1
branch.--jasonOn Aug 22, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm
will be moved to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server
--jason
-sachin
-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
some soap headers are configured on the exchange.
If possible, i 'd like to have such discussions on the dev mailing list :)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 6/26/06, Eric Dofonsou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Guillaume
I've build project for the WSI compliance testing.
Right now all
changes.Jason Dillon wrote: On Aug 22, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: On 8/23/06, Jason Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its probably not going to go into 1.1.1 unless you have it done right now and all is good... but defs for 1.1.2.
It's done and it works for my plugins.That does not mean
sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:800)at
java.net.HttpURLConnection.getResponseCode(HttpURLConnection.java:272)at org.apache.geronimo.system.plugin.PluginInstallerGBean.connect(PluginInstallerGBean.java:965)... 13 more
-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
The broker bean is defined in the activemq.xml spring file.
Both are loaded at the same time (see web.xml), that's why
spring can resolve this dependency.
Guillaume
On 3/8/06, Charles Souillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume,
I think there is an error on this commit as the depends-on
In ServiceMix, i solved the problem by specifying another log4j
configuration that is used in maven only.
Just add the following lines in the project.properties
maven.junit.sysproperties=log4j.configuration
log4j.configuration=log4j-tests.properties
and magically, maven tests will be run
-INF prefix=META-INF/
ant:zipfileset dir=${basedir}/target/jbi_sa_${saname}
includes=*.zip/
/ant:zip
/goal
Good idea.
Thanks for the goals definitions ...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
bye
Raffaele
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:22 +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
See
We have to do something about that.
I think we should remove PXE from the distribution and make people
download the installer themselves.
Any thoughts ?
Guillaume
Guillaume Nodet (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/SM-244?page=comments#action_35754 ]
Guillaume Nodet
...
Guillaume Nodet
dependencies inside a shared library or directly
inside components.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 3/22/06, Charles Souillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am havin troubles when compiling the latest svn head today 2 PM
/serviceMix/trunk/servicemix-jms/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jms
Btw,some of this stuff has been duplicated in javamail spec, see
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-spec-javamail/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/mail/util/
Guillaume Nodet
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
crypto should be ok. Though ASN1, Base64 etc aren't necessarily
resources or do I really have to create a specific
deployment plan of some kind ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
is stopped, I think this will
be automatic).
I 'm really looking for feedback on this as I am not not a J2EE expert,
nor a Geronimo expert ...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Thanks,
Aaron
On 4/4/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to dain and djencks advises, I have began to write
. This information is provided when
referencing such a resource from a web-app deployment descriptor, but in
my case, I do not have such information. If you have any hints on that
it would be cool ...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
It appears that the JBI spec didn't provide any
. This information is provided when referencing such a
resource from a web-app deployment descriptor, but in my case, I do not
have such information. If you have any hints on that it would be cool ...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
It appears that the JBI spec didn't provide any
It seems that the version you are running is quite old.
Could you try with a recent snapshot ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 4/6/06, fretzlaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tried but doesn't work... take a look at my XML:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
beans xmlns=http://xbean.org
groupId should be incubator-servicemix
and repository url should be http://cvs.apache.org/repository
Guillaume Nodet
On 4/7/06, fretzlaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you check if this config is correct??
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.servicemix
That's a warning, and this is always the case when using m1 artifacts with m2.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 4/7/06, fretzlaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NOw I catch the message:
[WARN] POM for 'incubator-servicemix:servicemix-core:pom:3.0-SNAPSHOT' is
invalid. It will be ignored for artifact
Change the geronimo.properties entry in the ./gplan/project.properties to the
geronimo version you want to use (1.0 I guess).
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 4/11/06, kahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume Nodet guillaume.nodet at worldonline.fr writes:
Hi everybody,
I have compiled a M1
binding link fixed,
but don't have time to do it myself at the moment.
I will fix the link (which is not a bad link actually, the doc has not
been written).
Cheers,
Guillaume
Cheers,
- Dan
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have compiled a M1 release yesterday. Please take some
Glad it now works ...
Guillaume Nodet
On 4/11/06, Soumadeep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re-wrote all the required xml files (jbi.xml,servicemix-sa.xml and
servicemix.xml)and it works fine :-)
-Original Message-
From: Soumadeep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 11
Do you still have this problem ?
If yes, you could try to remove the beans in the configuration one by
one until you find which bean causes the problem.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 4/10/06, Charlesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, i'm using activemq.xml that of example in servicemix
I forgot to vote ...
+1
On 4/9/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have compiled a M1 release yesterday. Please take some time to
download and test it under your environment before voting it.
The maven artifacts are available at
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet
+1
Guillaume
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Guys,
We have a new RC3 cut of 4.0.
I've posted it here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0-RC3/distributions/
I've tagged the source for that build as:
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I see that there has been a good amount of work on 1.1 so far in terms
of testing, etc. Can everyone who is actively working on 1.1 reply
back to this note on what area your focusing? Also, if your not
working on 1.1 do you have some bandwidth
Take a look at http://servicemix.org/Using+Eclipse
You have to use maven 1 to build.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 4/17/06, fretzlaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a project that depends on servicemix:
dependency
groupIdincubator-servicemix/groupId
with J2EE containers
security when ServiceMix is deployed into such a container.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
I'd like at least http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-2 to be
fixed before the release.
Just have to apply the patch.
There are also patches for XBEAN-4 (m2 plugin for mapping generation) and
XBEAN-6 (bad dependencies scope) pending.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Dan Diephouse wrote
.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 4/25/06, Hossam Karim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please find my comments inline.
-Original Message-
From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:45 AM
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: ServiceMix
(which is
usually given by deployment descriptors). How did you work around that ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Krishnakumar B wrote:
Hi,
In geronimo road map there was a requirement for implementing Global
JNDI for geronimo.
An approach to implementing the same is posted below. Kindly post
(which is
usually given by deployment descriptors). How did you work around that ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Krishnakumar B wrote:
Hi,
In geronimo road map there was a requirement for implementing Global
JNDI for geronimo.
An approach to implementing the same is posted below. Kindly post
if the objects are bound when they are
created.
Btw, should the global JNDI tree be read-only, or read-write ?
IMHO, a read-write global JNDI tree would be very usefull.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Manu George wrote:
Thanks David.
Guillaume , Which proxy in the JNDI Tree are you referring where
geronimo
conflicting names for JCA resources... currently there is
nothing to prevent deploying JCA resource (or other resources that would
be bound to jndi) with the same name
Guillaume Nodet
Manu George wrote:
Hi, Guillaume
I guess if a writable context is implemented still the approach
given
I have checked in all outstanding patches.
I will do a release 2.3 asap, unless someone has any problems with it ...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Dan Diephouse wrote:
I was wondering if someone could commit some patches for the XBean
project. I just sent in a patch for two issues (XBEAN-8
Yes, it should be fine.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 4/28/06, emicalc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At http://servicemix.org/Getting+Started; in Testing the Installation I
have read that
The Window's console window [...] will display something similar to the
following log line if ServiceMix
101 - 200 of 2485 matches
Mail list logo
