JMS 2.0 Spec JAR

All, A few months ago I worked out a spec JAR for JMS 2.0 APIs, the purpose being to include it in apache projects. You can see the code here: https://github.com/johnament/geronimo-specs/tree/jms2 I'd like to move this into the geronimo specs area and was looking to discuss it further. I was

Re: JMS 2.0 Spec JAR

javaee-api 7 jar. Le 18 déc. 2014 14:51, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org a écrit : All, A few months ago I worked out a spec JAR for JMS 2.0 APIs, the purpose being to include it in apache projects. You can see the code here: https://github.com/johnament/geronimo-specs/tree/jms2 I'd like

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6455) API jar for JSR 343 - JMS 2.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14262876#comment-14262876 ] John D. Ament commented on GERONIMO-6455: - I have raised the following PR

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6455) API jar for JSR 343 - JMS 2.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14262880#comment-14262880 ] John D. Ament commented on GERONIMO-6455: - You'll note in the PR that many

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6455) API jar for JSR 343 - JMS 2.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14262905#comment-14262905 ] John D. Ament commented on GERONIMO-6455: - Hope you don't mind, I added a build

Re: JMS 2.0 Spec JAR

://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-02 13:53 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com: Romain, Who is him? As I mentioned, I have the code available if someone wants to tell me how to get it contributed that would be great. John On Thu Dec 18 2014 at 8:55:42 AM Romain Manni

Re: JMS 2.0 Spec JAR

Can't, because the PR is still open. Let me ping infra. On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 12:33:55 PM Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: You can open another one now Le 2 janv. 2015 18:24, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org a écrit : I've updated the PR after starting to port AMQ6

Re: JMS 2.0 Spec JAR

Ok, PR looks better now: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2/files On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 12:37:03 PM John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Can't, because the PR is still open. Let me ping infra. On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 12:33:55 PM Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com

Re: Geronimo release request

Martyn, Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer if possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a release. John On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor mtay...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all, I'd like to request a new release of

Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts

on SNAPSHOTs. Also note this release train was mainly motivated by AMQ which is waiting JMS 2 API to release their version 6 (thanks to John D Ament for the patch on the API BTW). Here is the list of artifacts included in this vote: - geronimo-javamail_1.4 + geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail

Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2

+1 (non binding) On Thu Feb 12 2015 at 3:45:17 PM Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hello guys, As stated in the other thread here the vote for the geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included. Here is the staging repo:

Re: JMS 2.0 Spec JAR

2015-01-02 18:41 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org: Ok, PR looks better now: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2/files On Fri Jan 02 2015 at 12:37:03 PM John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote: Can't, because the PR is still open. Let me ping infra

Re: Servlet 3.1 JAR

@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber http://www.tomitribe.com 2015-06-04 13:57 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org: Hi, Does

Servlet 3.1 JAR

Hi, Does anyone know if there's a servlet 3.1 JAR under apache somewhere? John

Re: jms 2.0 spec jar

d'oh! Clebert, I'll raise a PR. On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:17 AM Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: hi has http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jms_2.0_spec/1.0-alpha-2/geronimo-jms_2.0_spec-1.0-alpha-2.jar an issue? Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: JCache dependency

Dmitriy, I think what Romain is referring to is other TCKs. Generally, geronimo JAR versions don't reflect the version of spec that they implement. There may be alpha releases that match EDRs, or alphas that are based on the final version but with minor tweaks. For reference, Apache ActiveMQ

Re: JCache dependency

K compliance are a different matter, and >> it should be up to the project community itself to declare the compliance >> with a certain spec and pass the TCK. >> > >> > Am I wrong? >> > >> >> Yes, while not passing sigtest practise is to not releas

Re: Configuration for Java SE and Java EE JSR

Doesn't this overlap with another project you've been involved with, Tamaya? On Jul 14, 2016 6:10 PM, "Mark Struberg" wrote: Hi folks! I’ve started to extract the configuration work I’ve done in OWB, MyFaces and DeltaSpike into an own little project. For the MyFaces and

Re: Configuration for Java SE and Java EE JSR

Werner, Let's keep Alan's proposed moratorium. John On Jul 15, 2016 13:56, "Werner Keil" wrote: > Former DeviceMap comitter and PMC chair Reza was also the original author > of many parts of what he moved to GitHub in a fork, but folks like Bertrand > who's also on the

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6553: Attachment: GERONIMO-6553.patch Attached is a patch to apply to CDI 2.0 svn repo, https

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6553: Description: Enhancements to the CDI 2.0 spec jar to include: - async observers

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

John D. Ament created GERONIMO-6553: --- Summary: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates Key: GERONIMO-6553 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553 Project: Geronimo Issue Type

PR Merge?

Hi, I was wondering, would anyone be able to review this PR and perhaps merge it? After I ported Artemis to use Johnzon, Clebert noticed some performance issues where the service was being looked up always. His PR is to help resolve that. https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/4 John

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

The release says "1.1" but the email says "1.0". I'm assuming this is in fact the 1.1 release? John On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:55 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'd like to release a 1.0 of our validation jar. > > After having checked with gunnar the jar and

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

uld expect "1.1" (maybe?) John On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:06 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > The release says "1.1" but the email says "1.0". I'm assuming this is in > fact the 1.1 release? > > John > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:10 AM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > spec == validation-1.1 > > artifact == 1.0 ;) > Yep, that's what I was trying to write. :-) > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 06.10.2016 um 14:06 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.0

+1 to ship it. One comment, there's been input in the past that geronimo releases don't show up in the system. Should we ensure that the final result gets put into https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/geronimo/ ? On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 7:25 AM Mark Struberg wrote: >

Geronimo Config & OWB 2

Hi all, I'm going to raise an issue but wanted to give a heads up. Currently, the Geronimo Config Impl only works on OWB 1.7.x. It fails on OWB 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT, with the error at [1]. I don't think it blocks the release, but may be an issue. [1]: https://paste.apache.org/QQbk

Re: Should primitive types work in config?

e should just register the same converters for their primitive > counterparts as well. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 29.07.2017 um 13:12 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > > Hey guys > > > > I raised a spec level issue on MP Config

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6573) Geronimo Config fails on OWB 2

John D. Ament created GERONIMO-6573: --- Summary: Geronimo Config fails on OWB 2 Key: GERONIMO-6573 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6573 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Assigned] (GERONIMO-6575) Register primitives by default (using same converters)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament reassigned GERONIMO-6575: --- Assignee: John D. Ament > Register primitives by default (using same convert

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6575) Register primitives by default (using same converters)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament resolved GERONIMO-6575. - Resolution: Fixed > Register primitives by default (using same convert

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6575) Register primitives by default (using same converters)

John D. Ament created GERONIMO-6575: --- Summary: Register primitives by default (using same converters) Key: GERONIMO-6575 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6575 Project: Geronimo

Should primitive types work in config?

Hey guys I raised a spec level issue on MP Config because primitives don't work quite right in Geronimo Config and when I looked at the spec, it didn't say they should. Basically, primitives aren't used in the TCK, and the follow behaviors are noticed: int port = config.getValue("some key",

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6574) Geronimo Config unable to load injection points when running with Weld3

John D. Ament created GERONIMO-6574: --- Summary: Geronimo Config unable to load injection points when running with Weld3 Key: GERONIMO-6574 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6574

Re: Should primitive types work in config?

> > > Le 29 juil. 2017 17:21, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit : > > Ok i can push when im back at a computer (have changes locally). Do we > want to introduce geronimo specific tests or wait until i can push to mp > config? > > On Jul 2

Re: Should primitive types work in config?

You can inject to primitive fields in DS config (that's how I found this problem). John On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 6:10 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Interesting, why was it rejected in DeltaSpike config then? Do you recall? > > Now on config itself if cdi does +1 to

Re-rolling Config 1.0 this week?

Hey guys Any objections to rolling another Config 1.0 release this week? John

Changing how Geronimo Config handles empty strings

I raised a MP Config Spec issue [1] and discussion. Based on how Payara is doing it, I believe that Geronimo Config checking for empty strings is incorrect. GConfig throws NoSuchElementException if the value is empty, but it seems like this is expected behavior and should instead return empty

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6578) CDI.setCDIProvider caches the value of CDIProvider.getCDI

John D. Ament created GERONIMO-6578: --- Summary: CDI.setCDIProvider caches the value of CDIProvider.getCDI Key: GERONIMO-6578 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6578 Project: Geronimo

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6577) [config] injection of @ConfigProperty Provider is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16125573#comment-16125573 ] John D. Ament commented on GERONIMO-6577: - This is now fixed in both Weld and OWB use cases

Re: More Config Spec updates

inion. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > Am 08.07.2017 um 17:15 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > > Hey guys > > > > I made some more enhancements within the Geronimo Config impl. They > added three new converter types, all working n

More Config Spec updates

Hey guys I made some more enhancements within the Geronimo Config impl. They added three new converter types, all working now. I downgraded back to OWB 1.7.3 since it looks like they won't be signing JARs for the release. I have a fix pending for the Weld Arquillian Adapter to handle service

Re: Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 1:02 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Le 17 juil. 2017 04:13, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit : > > All, > > Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github? I &

Access to JIRA

All, Would someone mind adding me as a developer on the geronimo JIRA so I can assign tickets? John

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6571) Add root element to beans.xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16091565#comment-16091565 ] John D. Ament commented on GERONIMO-6571: - Good catch, thanks. Testing a fix right now. >

Re: Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

>> > >> > Le 18 juil. 2017 06:38, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit : >> > Great, txs a bunch! >> > >> > LieGrue, >> > strub >> > >> > >> > > Am 18.07.2017 um 00:10 schrieb John D. Ament

Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

All, Would anyone be against mirroring the Geronimo Config module on github? I think it would be a good thing to get more people aware of the feature. Second, who can I talk to get access to edit http://geronimo.apache.org/ ? I think it would be good to start adding docs on how to use Config.

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6571) Add root element to beans.xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament resolved GERONIMO-6571. - Resolution: Fixed Ok, pushed up a fix. If you could give it a shot. > Add r

[jira] [Assigned] (GERONIMO-6571) Add root element to beans.xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament reassigned GERONIMO-6571: --- Assignee: John D. Ament > Add root element to beans.

[DISCUSS] When to release Config?

All, Since MP Config 1.0 is almost released, should we plan to release the Geronimo Config Impl? It would be good to have that available shortly after the spec is out. I'm assuming we'd want to release this as "1.0". If needed, I can execute the release and call for the vote. Maybe early next

Re: CI for Geronimo Config

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:39 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Le 4 juil. 2017 00:01, "John D. Ament" <john.d.am...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > All, > > I noticed a couple of things with running Geronimo Config locally. >

Re: svn commit: r1800715 - /geronimo/components/config/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ConfigExtension.java

I'm not 100% in love with this change, and would like input from others (e.g. Mark). the TCK expects a failure to occur, which makes sense. i'm not sure if the default "defaultValue" was changed over time, so I'm not sure if we need the empty string check or not. John On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at

CI for Geronimo Config

All, I noticed a couple of things with running Geronimo Config locally. - If I build from source (the MP config repo) and then build Geronimo Config its all good. However, when the JAR is downloaded via the maven repo, I get errors like this:

Re: CI for Geronimo Config

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:01 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:39 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> Le 4 juil. 2017 00:01, "John D. Ament" <john.d.am...@gmail.com>

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6574) Geronimo Config unable to load injection points when running with Weld3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament resolved GERONIMO-6574. - Resolution: Fixed > Geronimo Config unable to load injection points when runn

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6573) Geronimo Config fails on OWB 2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament resolved GERONIMO-6573. - Resolution: Fixed Resolved upstream. > Geronimo Config fails on OW

[jira] [Assigned] (GERONIMO-6574) Geronimo Config unable to load injection points when running with Weld3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament reassigned GERONIMO-6574: --- Assignee: John D. Ament > Geronimo Config unable to load injection points w

Re: svn commit: r1804164 - in /geronimo/components/config/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi: ConfigExtension.java ConfigInjectionBean.java

Just as an FYI, I chatted with Martin from Weld to understand what's going on, it wasn't obvious to me. Weld only generates beans for InjectionPoint for each injection point of type InjectionPoint. So what was there wouldn't work. getInjectableReference does, and it seems to work fine for OWB

Re: Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

ect? Site will be small and it will allow to > get direct ide help no? > > Le 30 juil. 2017 23:19, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit : > >> I didn't see any additional follow up, so I can plan to start a new >> geronimo site using jbake. Does some

Re: Other MP Specs @ Geronimo?

t of claims that's being requested as well. Yes, the json smart dependency bites, maybe we can convince the author to switch to the javax.json namespace? > > > Le 30 juil. 2017 23:28, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit : > > All, > > I know Mark

Other MP Specs @ Geronimo?

All, I know Mark brought in Config to Geronimo. We have at least 3 more specs coming in MP 1.2 (Fault Tolerance, Health, JWT Processing), possibly Metrics and OpenTracing. I have a fully functioning JWT Processing impl based on jose ( https://bitbucket.org/connect2id/nimbus-jose-jwt/src ) which

Wrong exception thrown when value missing in config

I noticed the following logic: if (!hasValue) { deploymentProblems.add(new IllegalArgumentException("Missing converter for '" + key + "' from " + injectionPoint)); } The problem isn't that the converter is missing, but that the value is missing

Re: Mirroring Geronimo Config on Github?

after. Anyway, big +1 for it. > > Le 18 juil. 2017 06:38, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit : > >> Great, txs a bunch! >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> > Am 18.07.2017 um 00:10 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apa

Re: Renaming Geronimo Config?

Not to stir that pot, but does it make sense to just rename Geronimo itself to XBean? I'm assuming then for config you're talking about changing the coordinates to org.apache.xbean:xbean-config(-impl) ? John On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 7:15 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > Perfectly

Re: svn commit: r1804397 - in /geronimo/components/config/trunk: ./ impl/ impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/

be good to go again. John On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:44 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > I can get to some of it. > > We have a couple of issues now though: > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-2411 > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-712 > > Martin do

Re: svn commit: r1804397 - in /geronimo/components/config/trunk: ./ impl/ impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/

:02 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Ok, I've readded some of the Weld3 support, 3 tests are failing. > > Some interesting notes: > > - If I remove Provider support, it generally works. However, I suddenly > get duplicate beans of type Provider, which is

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6576) Implement MP Config 1.1

John D. Ament created GERONIMO-6576: --- Summary: Implement MP Config 1.1 Key: GERONIMO-6576 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6576 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement

Re: svn commit: r1804397 - in /geronimo/components/config/trunk: ./ impl/ impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/

e. > > I also would love to add a Weld profile. I thought we have this already > but seems we missed it? > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 08.08.2017 um 12:58 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > > One note - hardcoding "isAltern

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.0

On the subject of serializable. We fail one of the comments in the MP Spec (but not in the TCK!) our injected Config class is *not* serializable. But for that to work, all config sources and all converters must be serializable. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 6:57 AM Mark Struberg

Re: svn commit: r1804397 - in /geronimo/components/config/trunk: ./ impl/ impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/cdi/ impl/src/test/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/test/internal/

One note - hardcoding "isAlternative" to true breaks in Weld. Unless there is a base bean of same type, the alternative is ignored. Hence why I only did isAlternative on the provider type, all others are just regular beans. John On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 6:55 AM wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.0

anni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >>> +1 (for the release and the src zip in dist) > >>> > >>> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | JavaEE Factory > >>> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.0

a 1.1 shortly. John On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:16 PM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > It's a requirement for direct injection, but not for Provider afair > > Lg, > Strub > > Am 08.08.2017 um 01:03 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > >

Re: Re-rolling Config 1.0 this week?

stop config. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 16.08.2017 um 12:35 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > > Hey guys > > > > Any objections to rolling another Config 1.0 release this week? > > > > John > >

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6553: Attachment: GERONIMO_6553_Adding_SE_support_.patch [~struberg] I see you're still

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6553: Attachment: (was: GERONIMO_6553_Adding_SE_support_.patch) > CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Upda

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6553: Attachment: GERONIMO_6553_Adding_SE_support_.patch > CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Upda

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6553: Attachment: (was: GERONIMO_6553_Adding_SE_support_.patch) > CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Upda

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16028445#comment-16028445 ] John D. Ament commented on GERONIMO-6553: - And the good thing is I can just send those verbatim

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6553: Attachment: GERONIMO_6553_Adding_SE_support.patch > CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Upda

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6553: Attachment: GERONIMO_6553_Adding_Request_Context_Control.patch Here they are. Only

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

+1 and especially happy to not see alpha in the version #! On Jun 27, 2017 5:16 AM, "Mark Struberg" wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing our geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar in > version 1.0 > This is the API for CDI-2.0. The artifact does pass the CDI TCK and is >

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

I just looked, the implementation of ServiceLoader is different for SeContainerInitializer and CDIProvider. https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/blob/trunk/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/se/SeContainerInitializer.java#L47

[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-6576) Implement MP Config 1.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament closed GERONIMO-6576. --- > Implement MP Config 1.1 > --- > > Key: G

[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-6566) Implement MicroProfile Config

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament closed GERONIMO-6566. --- > Implement MicroProfile Config > - > >

[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-6571) Add root element to beans.xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament closed GERONIMO-6571. --- > Add root element to beans.xml > - > >

[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-6579) Support injecting Supplier

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament closed GERONIMO-6579. --- > Support injecting Supplier > - > > K

[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-6577) [config] injection of @ConfigProperty Provider is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament closed GERONIMO-6577. --- > [config] injection of @ConfigProperty Provider is bro

[jira] [Closed] (GERONIMO-6575) Register primitives by default (using same converters)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] John D. Ament closed GERONIMO-6575. --- > Register primitives by default (using same convert

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6589) Use getPropertyNames to locate properties that should exist

John D. Ament created GERONIMO-6589: --- Summary: Use getPropertyNames to locate properties that should exist Key: GERONIMO-6589 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6589 Project

[DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release

-config-1.0-source-release.zip Since it's built using Maven, you can directly add it to your existing project to get started, org.apache.geronimo.config geronimo-config-impl 1.0 Cheers! John D. Ament On behalf of the Geronimo PMC

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6588) Add Apache RAT checks to Safeguard build

John D. Ament created GERONIMO-6588: --- Summary: Add Apache RAT checks to Safeguard build Key: GERONIMO-6588 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6588 Project: Geronimo Issue

Re: [DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release

it to your existing project to get started, org.apache.geronimo.config geronimo-config-impl 1.0 Cheers! John D. Ament On behalf of the Geronimo PMC On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:50 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bu

Re: [DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release

We need to get a theme together for the website. On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 3:08 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not sure what you refer too but can have a few cycles tomorrow to help if > clarified ;). > > Le 16 sept. 2017 02:44, "John D. Ament&

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geronimo Config 1.0 Release!

-config-impl 1.0 Cheers! John D. Ament On behalf of the Geronimo PMC

[RESULT] (was [VOTE] Release Geronimo Config 1.0)

https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-09-13 16:44 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>: > >> +1 >> >> 2017-09-10 19:

Re: [DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:36 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sep 14, 2017, at 3:54 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > as well as being the first release of a MicroProfile specification > implementation here at Apache > >

Re: [DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release

u <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <

Additional Config Sources?

HI All, I was wondering, would it make sense if we created, perhaps separate from the core of Geronimo Config (maybe new repo?) a set of reusable Config Sources based on MP Config? This way if people were planning to use etcd, consul, zookeeper, archaius (to name a few) we could have a built in,

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6591) Add support for fallbacks

John D. Ament created GERONIMO-6591: --- Summary: Add support for fallbacks Key: GERONIMO-6591 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6591 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Sub-task

  1   2   3   >