---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5987/#review10614
---
Alessandro, can you please try the same test with a lot of vertices (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maja Kabiljo updated GIRAPH-293:
Attachment: GIRAPH-293.patch
Forgot to mark as 'Patch Available' last time.
I'm just rebasing it n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13439414#comment-13439414
]
Alessandro Presta commented on GIRAPH-293:
--
If there's no merge conflict, you don
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alessandro Presta updated GIRAPH-249:
-
Attachment: GIRAPH-249.patch
Updated to match review https://reviews.apache.org/r/5987/di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alessandro Presta updated GIRAPH-249:
-
Attachment: GIRAPH-249.patch
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5987/diff/11/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13439475#comment-13439475
]
Maja Kabiljo commented on GIRAPH-293:
-
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6731/diff/#index_h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13439481#comment-13439481
]
Alessandro Presta commented on GIRAPH-211:
--
Any update on this? I don't know the
Alessandro Presta created GIRAPH-310:
Summary: Simplify vertex initialization
Key: GIRAPH-310
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-310
Project: Giraph
Issue Type: Improvement
Maja Kabiljo created GIRAPH-311:
---
Summary: Master halting in superstep 0 is ignored by workers
Key: GIRAPH-311
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-311
Project: Giraph
Issue Type:
After several supersteps, sometimes a worker thread dies (say it ran out of
memory). Zookeeper waits for ~5 mins (600 seconds) and then decides that
the worker is not responsive and fails the entire job. At this point if you
have a checkpoint saved it will resume from there otherwise you have to
st
> On Aug. 22, 2012, 8:55 a.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote:
> > Alessandro, can you please try the same test with a lot of vertices (you
> > only had 10 vertices here)? If vertices are visited in random order in the
> > prepareSuperstep, I think you should have much more disk operations.
> >
> > > Also
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5987/
---
(Updated Aug. 22, 2012, 10:34 a.m.)
Review request for giraph and Avery Ching.
> On Aug. 22, 2012, 8:55 a.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote:
> > Alessandro, can you please try the same test with a lot of vertices (you
> > only had 10 vertices here)? If vertices are visited in random order in the
> > prepareSuperstep, I think you should have much more disk operations.
> >
> > > Also
> On Aug. 22, 2012, 8:55 a.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote:
> > Alessandro, can you please try the same test with a lot of vertices (you
> > only had 10 vertices here)? If vertices are visited in random order in the
> > prepareSuperstep, I think you should have much more disk operations.
> >
> > > Also
> On Aug. 22, 2012, 8:55 a.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote:
> > Alessandro, can you please try the same test with a lot of vertices (you
> > only had 10 vertices here)? If vertices are visited in random order in the
> > prepareSuperstep, I think you should have much more disk operations.
> >
> > > Also
> On Aug. 22, 2012, 8:55 a.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote:
> > Alessandro, can you please try the same test with a lot of vertices (you
> > only had 10 vertices here)? If vertices are visited in random order in the
> > prepareSuperstep, I think you should have much more disk operations.
> >
> > > Also
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5987/
---
(Updated Aug. 22, 2012, 12:36 p.m.)
Review request for giraph and Avery Ching.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5987/
---
(Updated Aug. 22, 2012, 1 p.m.)
Review request for giraph and Avery Ching.
Cha
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6731/
---
Review request for giraph.
Description
---
Making aggregators work correctl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5987/#review10621
---
Looks good to me now. Again, great work!
- Maja Kabiljo
On Aug. 22
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-301:
---
Attachment: GIRAPH-301-7.patch
just a quick rebase, no changes.
> InputSplit Reserva
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13439703#comment-13439703
]
Eugene Koontz commented on GIRAPH-211:
--
Hi Alessandro, I am working actively on it an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13439739#comment-13439739
]
Alessandro Presta commented on GIRAPH-211:
--
Awesome, looking forward to it!
Eli Reisman created GIRAPH-312:
--
Summary: Giraph needs an admin script
Key: GIRAPH-312
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-312
Project: Giraph
Issue Type: New Feature
Com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-312:
---
Attachment: GIRAPH-312-1.patch
> Giraph needs an admin script
>
>
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
