oing it after u +1 ned.
> > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:11:13 -0800
> > Subject: Re: Progress towards 1.1.0
> > From: ro...@shaposhnik.org
> > To: dev@giraph.apache.org
> >
> > Any reason you haven't resolved it yet (in JIRA I mean)?
> >
> > Thanks,
Roman, resolved it in the jira, just forgot doing it after u +1 ned.
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:11:13 -0800
> Subject: Re: Progress towards 1.1.0
> From: ro...@shaposhnik.org
> To: dev@giraph.apache.org
>
> Any reason you haven't resolved it yet (in JIRA I mean)?
>
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Claudio Martella
wrote:
> while 747 and 800 don't look fixable in the short term.
Well, that seals it -- they are out of 1.1.0 (unless somebody
comes back with an awesome patch this week).
> As for 849, I dunno, we need a volunteer.
I've got one ;-)
Thanks,
Rom
Any reason you haven't resolved it yet (in JIRA I mean)?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Pavan Kumar A wrote:
> 840 is already checked in.
>
>> From: claudio.marte...@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:55:24 +0100
>> Subject: Re: Prog
is task soon, definitely this afternoon.
Best wishes,
Mirko
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Pavan Kumar A wrote:
> 840 is already checked in.
>
> > From: claudio.marte...@gmail.com
> > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:55:24 +0100
> > Subject: Re: Progress towards 1.1.0
>
840 is already checked in.
> From: claudio.marte...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:55:24 +0100
> Subject: Re: Progress towards 1.1.0
> To: dev@giraph.apache.org
>
> 814 and 850 are now in, and 840 should be on its way. I hope we can get 825
> in soon, while 747 and 8
814 and 850 are now in, and 840 should be on its way. I hope we can get 825
in soon, while 747 and 800 don't look fixable in the short term. As for
849, I dunno, we need a volunteer.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> it looks like we're currently standing at 7 u
quite frankly, we've had more than a bunch of reports on the ml about the
fact that out of core graph is unusable. the current one, without the
current available patch, is completely broken. we should ask users, i guess.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Sebastian Schelter wrote:
> Good questio
Good question. I personally just need it for experiments for a research
paper, so there's no need to hold off the release from my perspective.
Not sure how important the out-of-core support is for others.
Best,
Sebastian
On 02/18/2014 10:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Sebastian Schelter wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> I'm testing the patch for GIRAPH-825 with Armando and Claudio. I'm traveling
> this week, but I will continue with the tests next week.
Understood, but the question then becomes -- how long do we hold off a release
for? Ho
Hi Roman,
I'm testing the patch for GIRAPH-825 with Armando and Claudio. I'm
traveling this week, but I will continue with the tests next week.
Best,
Sebastian
On 02/18/2014 10:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
it looks like we're currently standing at 7 unresolved
issues scheduled to go
Hi!
it looks like we're currently standing at 7 unresolved
issues scheduled to go into 1.1.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.1.0%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20GIRAPH%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
It looks like the followi
12 matches
Mail list logo
