Ah, yes I had forgotten about that when I wrote the ticket. I'll rework the
ticket in a little while.
Cheers, Paul.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Emilian Bold
wrote:
> I would like to help out with the task listed at
> https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?6afc5096
>
> I've only briefly ex
I made a separate branch and a PR https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/548
If you want you can commit with your user, most of the code is actually
yours.
--emi
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:01 PM, John Wagenleitner <
john.wagenleit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Emilian,
>
> Nice work, I tried out th
Hi Emilian,
Nice work, I tried out the new prefs dialog on Linux and Windows and it
looks good to me. I don't have a Mac to test with, but it sounds like a
nice touch adding it into the Mac menu bar.
I would recommend putting the commit in a separate feature branch before
submitting a pull reque
thanks, I added that to the user list post
On 24.05.2017 11:32, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
Just found it by looking at the code, of course :-)
*groovy:*000*>* :set interpreterMode true
*groovy:*000*>* def a = 1
*===>* 1
*groovy:*000*>* println a
1
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Guillaume
On 24.05.2017 10:57, Remi Forax wrote:
Hi Jochen,
jshell, the equivalent of groovysh for java included in 9, does something like
this,
it stores the content of all variables declaration as fields into a synthetic
class and all statements as method so statement have access to the content of
t
Just found it by looking at the code, of course :-)
*groovy:*000*>* :set interpreterMode true
*groovy:*000*>* def a = 1
*===>* 1
*groovy:*000*>* println a
1
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Guillaume Laforge
wrote:
> There's a parameter, I believe, for enabling this behavior already.
> I j
There's a parameter, I believe, for enabling this behavior already.
I just can't remember what it is, but I'm pretty sure there is.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Andres Almiray wrote:
> Reusing the binding between invocations would be a way to get around this
> problem.
> However we'd need a
Reusing the binding between invocations would be a way to get around this
problem.
However we'd need a new command to clear/reset the binding.
Cheers,
Andres
---
Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast
http://andresalmiray.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray
-
Hi Jochen,
jshell, the equivalent of groovysh for java included in 9, does something like
this,
it stores the content of all variables declaration as fields into a synthetic
class and all statements as method so statement have access to the content of
the field.
But because you have bindings in
Hi,
a User on the user-list mentioned it is currently not possible to define
a local variable in one evaluation and use it in the next. So for example
> def x = 10
> println x
this fails because the eval for println x has no knowledge about x=10.
Is this correct, did we have any plans to ch
10 matches
Mail list logo
