Am 24.11.2017 um 13:09 schrieb Mauro Molinari:
I think this is a quite "grey" area of Groovy, at least it took a while
for me to understand getter/setter vs direct field access in different
cases when I faced it and some fixes to the Groovy plugin for Eclipse
were also necessary to properly s
Hi Cédric,
Groovy 3.0.0 alpha can help groovy developers try the new parser
easily, which is enabled by default. In addition, we can get more feedback
earlier. So if no -1 on releasing 3.0.0 alpha, I'll try to release later.
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabbl
I think this is a quite "grey" area of Groovy, at least it took a while
for me to understand getter/setter vs direct field access in different
cases when I faced it and some fixes to the Groovy plugin for Eclipse
were also necessary to properly support code highlighting and navigation.
Now you'r
Nor a 2.5! :-) My focus right now is progressing 2.5 out the door but that
will happen after G3 Summit. I have some final variable analysis tweaks
ready to add which should make 2.5 close to feature complete but there are
some Spock hacks that need further testing. (Spock doesn't currently set
the
I'm not sure it makes sense to release a 3.0.0 alpha when we don't even
have a 2.6 out.
2017-11-24 10:22 GMT+01:00 Daniel.Sun :
> Hi Paul,
>
> As Groovy 2.4.13 has been released, I plan to release Groovy
> 3.0.0-alpha-1 later.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://groovy.3
Hi Paul,
As Groovy 2.4.13 has been released, I plan to release Groovy
3.0.0-alpha-1 later.
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
Am 24.11.2017 um 09:09 schrieb Mauro Molinari:
Il 24/11/2017 01:46, Jochen Theodorou ha scritto:
In my opinion the test is wrong, but I'd like to hear others about this.
And another point. We seem to have no similar test for dynamic Groovy.
Groovy does use direct field access if the field is
Il 24/11/2017 01:46, Jochen Theodorou ha scritto:
In my opinion the test is wrong, but I'd like to hear others about this.
And another point. We seem to have no similar test for dynamic Groovy.
Groovy does use direct field access if the field is available on
"this". But the question here is if
