Understood, thanks for the clarification.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Paul King wrote:
>
> We'd consider streamlining but with caveats.
>
> On the one hand, those attributes are influenced a little by what Commons
> CLI supports. It doesn't support ranges like "2..4" at all. However,
> Cl
We'd consider streamlining but with caveats.
On the one hand, those attributes are influenced a little by what Commons
CLI supports. It doesn't support ranges like "2..4" at all. However,
CliBuilder is meant to be an abstraction layer above the CLI
implementation, so we should assume we have some
The groovy.cli.Option annotation currently has three attributes for
modeling the number of arguments (arity) of an option:
- boolean optionalArg() default false
- int numberOfArguments() default 1
- String numberOfArgumentsString() default ""
Are we open to changing this to a single at
+1
2018-03-23 8:04 GMT+01:00 Paul King :
>
> Dear development community,
>
> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.4.15 release! This is
> mainly to fix a regression in calling static methods in interfaces. We were
> trying to improve the JDK9 experience but on the 2.4 branch it caus
Yep, thanks everyone for the fast response!
But we still need to wait the 3 days as per Apache voting guidelines.
Just a reminder: a subsequent -1 vote would cancel out one of the already
cast +1 votes.
Cheers, Paul.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:40 PM, Daniel.Sun wrote:
> 3 votes from PMC members
Am 23.03.2018 um 12:47 schrieb Paul King:
We temporarily reverted the ASM change but that ended up not being the
problem, so I put it back the same as in 2.4.14.
The problem was that there was no Java8 plugin for 2_4_X so neither the
code fixes from GROOVY-8338 nor the respective test ran - fi
3 votes from PMC members have been collected :)
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
Hi Shekh
As and idea, if ArrayUserName is an OracleTypes.ARRAY, maybe it needs to
return something as a List at `getValue()` method
regards
2018-03-23 8:34 GMT+01:00 Ahmad, Shekh Shakeel
:
> Hi All,
>
> Is that anyone can help ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> *Shekh Shakeel Ahmad, ITIL Certifi
Hi,
With all the versions of Groovy currently released, there is a problem
that anyone using Spock seems to be stuck on Groovy 2.4.x because the
latest version of Spock is 1.1-groovy-2.4 and so there is no reliable
Spock for Groovy 2.5.x, 2.6.x or 3.0.x.
--
Russel.
=
We temporarily reverted the ASM change but that ended up not being the
problem, so I put it back the same as in 2.4.14.
The problem was that there was no Java8 plugin for 2_4_X so neither the
code fixes from GROOVY-8338 nor the respective test ran - fixed now with an
empty(*) Java8 plugin for 2_4_X
Hi All,
Is that anyone can help ?
Thanks & Regards
Shekh Shakeel Ahmad, ITIL Certified
From: Ahmad, Shekh Shakeel
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 4:34 PM
To: 'comm...@groovy.apache.org' ;
'us...@groovy.apache.org' ; 'dev@groovy.apache.org'
; 'notificati...@groovy.apache.org'
Subject: Need He
Am 23.03.2018 um 08:04 schrieb Paul King:
Dear development community,
I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.4.15 release! This is
mainly to fix a regression in calling static methods in interfaces. We
were trying to improve the JDK9 experience but on the 2.4 branch it
caused e
+1
My smoke test (on JDK 8) went fine.
Nothing special to report.
Guillaume
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Daniel Sun wrote:
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
>
--
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer &
+1
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
Dear development community,
I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.4.15 release! This is
mainly to fix a regression in calling static methods in interfaces. We were
trying to improve the JDK9 experience but on the 2.4 branch it caused
existing functionality to be impacted even on JDK8.
15 matches
Mail list logo
