Hi Daniel,
I have updated the ticket with some VisalVM memory sampling screenshots:
For this short test Groovy 4 uses more than 13 million objects of type
java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference, together with an more than
100,000 java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference[] arrays, which
> What I can tell you for sure is, that invokedynamic has a big problem with
> 1-time calls. It is much more expensive to generate the callsite for
> invokedynamic than it is for our old callsite code (which will stop working)
> and also of course compared to direct method calls.
In addition, w
