Re: [PROPOSAL]About creating open collective for Groovy programming language in the name of Groovy Community

:01 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 5:48 AM Jennifer Strater > wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Was there a response from the Apache foundation? And as always, just let >> me know if I can help. >> > > What kind of a resp

Re: [PROPOSAL]About creating open collective for Groovy programming language in the name of Groovy Community

Hi everyone, Was there a response from the Apache foundation? And as always, just let me know if I can help. Best, Jenn On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:35 AM Marcin Erdmann wrote: > Given that I have no association with ASF nor am I a PMC member or a > committer I would be happy to take ownership

Re: suggestion: ImplicitSafeNavigation annotation

Hi OC, First, I agree with Paul and Andres that it would be nice to see how well this works outside of groovy core. Hopefully, someone here can help you make it a reality. In addition, I would really appreciate it, if, in the future, you did not use 'gentlemen' to address the entire mailing list.

Re: bool

little other benefit. One of my biggest pet peeve's with Python is > how they have polluted the namespace with short names I like to use as > variable names (dict, list, etc). Let's not do this with Groovy. > > Just my two cents. > Keith > > On Jul 22, 2018, at 4:57

Re: bool

Hi mg, I also don't like the 'fin' proposal, but I could get behind 'bool'. It's shorter but doesn't lose the meaning. It also makes it easier for people coming from other programming languages. Best, Jenn On Sun, Jul 22

Re: Indy vs default build

+1 Regards, Jenn On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Daniel Sun wrote: > +1 for setting indy by default. > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5. > nabble.com/Indy-vs-default-build-tp5741393p5741394.html > Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list ar