P.S. Just in case someone else has the same problem — as I am playing with
that, preliminarily it looks like the solution for a big codebase might be an
ASTT which would list the positions of all the real safe indices; this ASTT
would be run under Groovy 3 and its output would be then used with
Daniel,
> On 9. 9. 2022, at 1:30, Daniel Sun wrote:
> Add a space between ? and [
> p ? [0] : [1]
Well thanks, but that really helps with new code only. On the other hand, with
the existing codebase it is a royal PITA. Can't do that automatically, for I am
afraid no regexp could reliably disti
Add a space between ? and [
p ? [0] : [1]
Cheers,
Daniel Sun
On 2022/09/08 13:39:21 Christopher Smith wrote:
> The parser seems to be interpreting what you mean as a ternary as a
> null-safe array index.
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, 08:37 o...@ocs.cz wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I've just decid
ttps://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GROOVY/issues
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/GROOVY/issues>
>
> From: Christopher Smith
> Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 8:39 AM
> To: dev@groovy.apache.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: Groovy 4 parser bug?
>
> External
/projects/GROOVY/issues
From: Christopher Smith
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 8:39 AM
To: dev@groovy.apache.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: Groovy 4 parser bug?
External Email: Use caution with links and attachments.
The parser seems to be interpreting what you mean as a ternary as a null-safe
array index
The parser seems to be interpreting what you mean as a ternary as a
null-safe array index.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, 08:37 o...@ocs.cz wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've just decided it's time to upgrade from Groovy 3 to Groovy 4... and
> immediately bumped into a problem, which looks like a parser bug in a
Hi there,
I've just decided it's time to upgrade from Groovy 3 to Groovy 4... and
immediately bumped into a problem, which looks like a parser bug in an
extremely trivial scenario, which seems weird.
Do I perhaps miss something? I've checked
https://groovy-lang.org/releasenotes/groovy-4.0.html
