On 12.10.2015 15:35, Peter Ledbrook wrote:
> So, does it make sense to add a special case for Comparator so
that type
> inference works? Or perhaps a special case for any interface that
only
> has one method that's not defined on Object as well?
The later, yes. So bas
>
> > So, does it make sense to add a special case for Comparator so that type
> > inference works? Or perhaps a special case for any interface that only
> > has one method that's not defined on Object as well?
>
> The later, yes. So basically hashcode(), toString() and equals(Object)
> need speci
On 12.10.2015 07:51, Peter Ledbrook wrote:
Hi,
So, I had a difference of opinion with Marcin Erdmann on camera about
closure parameter type inference with functional interfaces. I said it
didn't work in my experience. Thankfully, Marcin worked out why my example:
import groovy.transform.Ty
Hi,
So, I had a difference of opinion with Marcin Erdmann on camera about
closure parameter type inference with functional interfaces. I said it
didn't work in my experience. Thankfully, Marcin worked out why my example:
import groovy.transform.TypeChecked
@TypeChecked
def someMethod
