Hm... Thanks, Tim.
I'll check this.
SY, Alexey
2007/6/13, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Looks like a number of the new files need the standard Apache block
comment at the start.
Regards,
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: apetrenko
> Date: Tue Jun 12 21:49:43 2007
> New Revision: 54673
No, we should not. We will fix it today.
SY, Alexey
2007/6/14, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Alexey
should we revert this patch?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2007/6/12, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It seems that newly committed FontLibrary can not be compiled on 64bit Linux
:(
>
> I'l
It is really related to HARMONY-3915.
Thanks,Leo
On 6/13/07, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
issue HARMOMY-4116 was updated.
thanks, Vladimir
On 6/12/07, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all:
> I cannot reproduce the problem on my machine. And a review of the
> source co
Hi Alexey
should we revert this patch?
Thanks,
Mikhail
2007/6/12, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It seems that newly committed FontLibrary can not be compiled on 64bit Linux :(
I'll take care of this issue. But if there any other volunteers... :)
SY, Alexey
2007/6/10, [EMAIL PROTECTED
According to our M2 scedule [1] we have just passed feature freeze date.
Please wait for a while with major changes, areas redesign, etc.
Bug fixing is fine (of course if it does not imply rewriting a component from
scratch :), adding missing API into classlib is also OK
Thanks,
Mikhail
[1] ht
HARMONY-4147 was filed about this issue.
Thank you, Lena
2007/6/13, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks Elena -- please open a JIRA and we'll fix it there.
Regards,
Tim
Elena Sayapina wrote:
> The following piece of code fails on Harmony-r545749, but passes on
> Harmony-r545092:
>
> impor
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> I've rolled back this commit since it produces a number of compile time
>> errors in AWT.
>
> It looks like some files from the original patch in HARMONY-1476 weren't
> committed, so compilation failed. I was going to try to add them, but I
> think
FYI, String has got two new methods as required by Java 6 spec. These
don't change the shape of String instances so should be non-controvertial.
Regards,
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: tellison
> Date: Wed Jun 13 07:10:41 2007
> New Revision: 546883
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewv
Looks like a number of the new files need the standard Apache block
comment at the start.
Regards,
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: apetrenko
> Date: Tue Jun 12 21:49:43 2007
> New Revision: 546734
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=546734
> Log:
> HARMONY-3593 "[classlib][
I've updated the M2 page [1], added certain links and info from the dev
list discussion.
I'd like to draw your attention to the table reflecting how far we are
from 98% pass rates. I've used information provided by Oleg Oleinik.
Would be great if someone could find a chance to update it regularly
Thanks Elena -- please open a JIRA and we'll fix it there.
Regards,
Tim
Elena Sayapina wrote:
> The following piece of code fails on Harmony-r545749, but passes on
> Harmony-r545092:
>
> import java.util.BitSet;
>
> public class bitsetTest {
>
>public static void main(String[] args
Chris Elford (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503989 ]
Chris Elford commented on HARMONY-3117:
---
no XML support. Just a plain, default sam
The following piece of code fails on Harmony-r545749, but passes on
Harmony-r545092:
import java.util.BitSet;
public class bitsetTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
BitSet bitset = null;
try {
bitset = new BitSe
issue HARMOMY-4116 was updated.
thanks, Vladimir
On 6/12/07, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, all:
I cannot reproduce the problem on my machine. And a review of the
source code give me no hint what is wrong.
What makes things worse is that current harmony's code will not give
any fu
On 6/13/07, Estelle Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks,Pavel,
Our group is interested in concurrency analysis,and try to do some
optimizations on that issue in JIT in the future. We intend to
get acquainted with the knowledge on the synchronization
optimizations available in JIT. And we'll app
+1 for externalizing host names from tests and set it to
.apache.org .
Is it possible to get a domain name for multicast address?
Do we really need this?
Regards,
2007/6/4, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is it possible to get a domain name for multicast address?
On 6/4/07, Sian January <[EMA
Hi,
You can find answers in "[jitrino] synchronization optimization" mail
thread. Feel free to ask if you need more detailed information on specific
code.
On 6/12/07, 史成荣 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi all,
Could you please give a simple introduction about the main flow of the
syncpt pass? t
Estelle,
We have another low-level optimization for monenter and monexit opcodes:
inlining the implementations of these helpers.
See
vm\thread\javasrc\org\apache\harmony\drlvm\thread\ThreadHelper.java
and
vm\jitrino\src\optimizer\helper_inliner.cpp
for details.
On 6/13/07, Estelle Liu <[EMAIL PRO
Thanks,Pavel,
Our group is interested in concurrency analysis,and try to do some
optimizations on that issue in JIT in the future. We intend to
get acquainted with the knowledge on the synchronization
optimizations available in JIT. And we'll appreciate that if you could put
your improving code in
I agree that it is ok just to throw exception if JAR/ZIP file is
closed. IMO RI's behavior is too complex to follow.
Regards,
2007/6/13, Tony Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ok, If no one objects, I'd like to provider a new patch for 2436 and
create another JIRA to record this non-bug difference, since
20 matches
Mail list logo
