Re: [M9] Testing - outstanding issues

2009-03-16 Thread Regis
Sian January wrote: Ok - I have tried to list all the issues from the other thread below, but please add any I've missed. It would be good to put a name against each of these so that we know they are being looked into. Any volunteers? 1. HttpURLConnectionTest and HttpsURLConnectionTest fail on

Re: [M9] Testing - outstanding issues

2009-03-16 Thread Regis
Sian January wrote: Ok - I have tried to list all the issues from the other thread below, but please add any I've missed. It would be good to put a name against each of these so that we know they are being looked into. Any volunteers? 1. HttpURLConnectionTest and HttpsURLConnectionTest fail on

Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-16 Thread Sean Qiu
Sounds interesting. 2009/3/13 Andrew Cornwall > Is there any desire to extend VMTT? > > - add a real assembly format (jsr :label or something like that, instead > of > jsr -11.) (Does jasm do this, and if so could we use their format?) > - add flexibility for bad classes >- specifying the

Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-16 Thread Sian January
Just wanted to encourage people to write their ideas up on the Wiki - only Oliver has done it so far and there is a deadline. Thanks, Sian 2009/3/12 Andrew Cornwall : > Is there any desire to extend VMTT? > >  - add a real assembly format (jsr :label or something like that, instead of > jsr -11

Re: [general] Board report due

2009-03-16 Thread Alexei Fedotov
Looks good. On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Oliver Deakin wrote: > Looks good to me. > > Regards, > Oliver > > Tim Ellison wrote: >> >> I've updated the wiki with the final version.  I intend to send it into >> the Board later today, so please fix any errors/omissions you notice asap. >> >> Than

Re: [general] Board report due

2009-03-16 Thread Oliver Deakin
Looks good to me. Regards, Oliver Tim Ellison wrote: I've updated the wiki with the final version. I intend to send it into the Board later today, so please fix any errors/omissions you notice asap. Thanks, Tim Tim Ellison wrote: Our regular ASF Board report is now due. I'm collecting s

Re: [general] Board report due

2009-03-16 Thread Tim Ellison
I've updated the wiki with the final version. I intend to send it into the Board later today, so please fix any errors/omissions you notice asap. Thanks, Tim Tim Ellison wrote: > Our regular ASF Board report is now due. I'm collecting some notes [1] > on new and noteworthy events since the last

Re: [M9] Testing - outstanding issues

2009-03-16 Thread Sian January
Ok - I have tried to list all the issues from the other thread below, but please add any I've missed. It would be good to put a name against each of these so that we know they are being looked into. Any volunteers? 1. HttpURLConnectionTest and HttpsURLConnectionTest fail on some systems - change

Re: [classlib] performance of java.io.File

2009-03-16 Thread Regis
陈磊 wrote: Great. I remember that FileInputStream's constructor also has performance problem. Maybe it was caused by the same reason. I guess so. Default, there is no SecurityManager installed, the gap with RI is not so huge, but still slow five times, need to be optimized. On Mon, Mar 1

Re: [classlib] performance of java.io.File

2009-03-16 Thread 陈磊
Great. I remember that FileInputStream's constructor also has performance problem. Maybe it was caused by the same reason. On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Regis wrote: > Regis wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Recently I found our java.io.File implementation is obviously slower than >> RI on Windows

Re: [classlib] performance of java.io.File

2009-03-16 Thread Regis
Regis wrote: Hi all, Recently I found our java.io.File implementation is obviously slower than RI on Windows, especially when a SecurityManager is installed. Testing with following simple test case: File file = new File("FilePerTest.java"); long start = System.currentTimeMill