On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:03 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/2009, boot...@earthlink.net boot...@earthlink.net wrote:
[Original Message]
From: Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Date: 10/9/2009 2:54:32 AM
Subject: Re: [general] Remove @author
Jesse Wilson wrote:
So Regis and I disagree on the merit of maintaining indices. Actually
disagreeing on such things is generally healthy since mobile/Android prefers
simplicity and memory efficiency, whereas serverside prefers high
throughput. Yet I still feel that the index optimizations were
On 13/Oct/2009 01:03, sebb wrote:
The problem with @author tags in code is that they can very quickly
get out of date.
After a few years of edits, how much of the original code is left?
Have the tags been kept up to date? Does it really make sense to have
recognition in the source code?
regi...@apache.org wrote:
Author: regisxu
Date: Tue Oct 13 07:35:56 2009
New Revision: 824625
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=824625view=rev
Log:
return value of Selector.select() should be same with selectedKeys.size()
Modified:
In message 200910061451.n96epjbk001...@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com,
Mark Hindess writes:
I've moved the site repository to site/trunk and merged that to
site/branches/live. You should use:
svn switch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/standard/site/trunk
to update a checkout
Regis wrote:
regi...@apache.org wrote:
This commit is incorrect and causes SelectorTest failed on Windows, I'll
fix it soon.
Fixed at r824652. I found SelectorTest is in exclude list of linux, but it
passes on my linux machine. It excluded in HARMONY-4116, does anyone can
reproduce this
In message 9623c9a50910122312y7de4b5d5j7568786e226b9...@mail.gmail.com,
Xiao-Feng Li writes:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:03 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
[SNIP]
The problem with @author tags in code is that they can very quickly
get out of date.
After a few years of edits, how much
In message 4ad432b3.2040...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
On 13/Oct/2009 01:03, sebb wrote:
The problem with @author tags in code is that they can very quickly
get out of date.
After a few years of edits, how much of the original code is left?
Have the tags been kept up to date? Does
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Nathan Beyer nbe...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly, the synchronization probably isn't appropriate on any of the
accessor/mutators - the granularity isn't correct. The locking
probably needs to encompass the entire method on DatagramSocket while
working on a
Mark, thanks for the explanations.
I personally have no strong opinion on this. Since you are
contributing on this, in Apache way, you probably make final call. :)
Thanks,
xiaofeng
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Mark Hindess
mark.hind...@googlemail.com wrote:
In message
Should we just start a Contributors page on the wiki and be done with it?
Deleting a name, check that it's on the wiki page.
Committing a patch, check that the author is on the wiki page.
-Nathan
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Xiao-Feng Li xiaofeng...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at
11 matches
Mail list logo
