On 09/Nov/2009 04:20, Charles Lee wrote:
That's strange. I also encounter the same problem when I build federate.
Ok, I'll go through and remove the /comment options from the link lines.
In the meantime I've just removed the comment pass through in our
rules at repo revision r834004.
FWIW I'm
On 05/Nov/2009 20:43, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
I enjoyed the simple, but neat optimization. Let me question if the
enlarged buffer should be stored at skipBuf.
1. Escaping reference always causes optimization problems. A
reasonable JIT can drop a local array allocation if it is possible to
On 27/Oct/2009 16:32, Jesse Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
The improvement in performance is impressive. What is the contribution
made by the use of the CopyOnWriteArrayList?
CopyOnWriteArrayList is ideal for situations when the
Congratulations!
Tim Ellison wrote:
On behalf of the PMC, I am delighted to welcome Jesse Wilson as our
newest committer on the Apache Harmony project.
Jesse has been sending in numerous patches to core areas of the codebase
for quite a while, and has been participating in the discussions on
Perhaps a dumb question - but is there a really a performance issue with
always using a stack-local localBuf and removing the shared static? The
code is simpler, and memory allocation is usually a fast operation.
The code below does look semantically safe, but there is a potential
performance
Congratulations!
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Oliver Deakin
oliver.dea...@googlemail.comwrote:
Congratulations!
Tim Ellison wrote:
On behalf of the PMC, I am delighted to welcome Jesse Wilson as our
newest committer on the Apache Harmony project.
Jesse has been sending in numerous
Hi all,
I work with Charles. Currently I'm working on a JET port to MIPS.
Since I haven't done any work on DRLVM, it's a learning experience. I've
taken the approach of stubbing out the port layer routines for MIPS with
aborts and working through components on an as needed basis. That helps
Hi,
Are there instructions on how to build a Java 6 version of Harmony? E.g., I
see binary snapshots for both 5 and 6 at:
http://harmony.apache.org/download.cgi, but the build instructions at
http://harmony.apache.org/quickhelp_contributors.html#3.
Starting the Federated Build appear to be for
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't mean to ask Why is a CopyOnWriteArrayList useful?, rather
what did it contribute to your logging improvements, e.g. correctness
that would require tons of duplicate coding otherwise, or performance
numbers, etc.
About comment option, I have no idea now :-(
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/Nov/2009 04:20, Charles Lee wrote:
That's strange. I also encounter the same problem when I build federate.
Ok, I'll go through and remove the /comment options from
Hello,
You can checkout the java6 code from the branch java6. IIRC, the build
instruction is the same as java5
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Vijay Menon v...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
Are there instructions on how to build a Java 6 version of Harmony? E.g.,
I
see binary snapshots for both
Thanks!
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Charles Lee littlee1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
You can checkout the java6 code from the branch java6. IIRC, the build
instruction is the same as java5
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Vijay Menon v...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
Are there
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't mean to ask Why is a CopyOnWriteArrayList useful?, rather
what did it contribute to your logging improvements, e.g. correctness
that
Jesse, Make sure to setup your SVN config to enable auto-props such
that new files have 'svn:eol-style=native'.
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:06 PM, jessewil...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jessewilson
Date: Tue Nov 10 03:06:30 2009
New Revision: 834316
URL:
enh wrote:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 02:28, Mark Hindess mark.hind...@googlemail.com wrote:
In message 4af3f7de.3020...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
On 06/Nov/2009 03:06, Regis wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 96933a4d0911051045p61431af5ie2cecb850a622...@mail.gmail.com,
enh writes:
On
Chris basically stated where we are...
I am going to try and just send a big diff pretty soon, so you can
see it - but, part of the delivery is breaking down the patches into
consumable pieces on the mailing list...
Unfortunately, we have been doing this for an RD project and this is
not our
Hi Regis,
Maybe add the z/OS newline, on z/OS 0x15 means the newline. You can refer to
PrintStream.write(int) for this.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Regis xu.re...@gmail.com wrote:
enh wrote:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 02:28, Mark Hindess mark.hind...@googlemail.com
wrote:
In message
Ray Chen wrote:
Hi Regis,
Maybe add the z/OS newline, on z/OS 0x15 means the newline. You can refer to
PrintStream.write(int) for this.
how about this:
if ((out.position() offset)
(out.get(out.position() - 1) == '\n' || out
.get(out.position() - 1) == 0x15)) {
Shall we store the return value of out.position()-1 to avoid invoking it
twice?
If it is too tiny for performace improvement, current patch seems good for
me.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Regis xu.re...@gmail.com wrote:
Ray Chen wrote:
Hi Regis,
Maybe add the z/OS newline, on z/OS 0x15
Is noone concerned about pooping this ebcdic cruft all over the place?
Shouldn't it be factored out into an isNewline method somewhere?
On Nov 9, 2009 10:10 PM, Ray Chen clrayc...@gmail.com wrote:
Shall we store the return value of out.position()-1 to avoid invoking it
twice?
If it is too tiny
Hi, Charles, Chris,
Thanks very much for sharing the information. Then I will wait for your
patches ;-).
Thanks.
Tianwei
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Charles Hardin ckhar...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris basically stated where we are...
I am going to try and just send a big diff pretty
21 matches
Mail list logo
