[classlib][archive] JarFile#getInputStream() (was: Re: [testing] M12 testing on Windows x86)

2009-11-30 Thread Tim Ellison
On 30/Nov/2009 06:31, enh wrote: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 22:27, Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote: I know the arguments that say available() should not be used to judge the total number of bytes that can be

Re: [classlib][archive] problems with ZipFile

2009-11-30 Thread Tim Ellison
On 27/Nov/2009 11:30, Oliver Deakin wrote: Tim Ellison wrote: snip FYI here is my hacked available() impl, which needs some testing before it is good to go in.. With this patch for available() applied the ASN1Exception no longer gets thrown in BerInputStream.read(), but instead an

Re: [classlib][archive] problems with ZipFile

2009-11-30 Thread Tim Ellison
On 30/Nov/2009 10:32, Tim Ellison wrote: On 27/Nov/2009 11:30, Oliver Deakin wrote: Tim Ellison wrote: snip FYI here is my hacked available() impl, which needs some testing before it is good to go in.. With this patch for available() applied the ASN1Exception no longer gets thrown in

Re: [classlib][archive] JarFile#getInputStream() (was: Re: [testing] M12 testing on Windows x86)

2009-11-30 Thread Jesse Wilson
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote: The method JarFile#getInputStream(ZipEntry) is spec'd to return an InputStream, not a ZipInputStream. Furthermore, as I showed, the RI returns a stream that answers with available() 1, i.e. it follows the InputStream

Re: [classlib][archive] JarFile#getInputStream()

2009-11-30 Thread Tim Ellison
On 30/Nov/2009 16:54, Jesse Wilson wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote: The method JarFile#getInputStream(ZipEntry) is spec'd to return an InputStream, not a ZipInputStream. Furthermore, as I showed, the RI returns a stream that answers with

[testing] M12 fix candidate HARMONY-6394

2009-11-30 Thread Tim Ellison
Would a committer please take a look at HARMONY-6394 and approve applying the patch to the current 5.0 stream to regain RI compatibility for M12? Fingers crossed this is the last blocker for M12. Please call out any test results showing remaining problems. Regards, Tim

Re: [testing] M12 fix candidate HARMONY-6394

2009-11-30 Thread Tim Ellison
On 30/Nov/2009 17:20, Tim Ellison wrote: Would a committer please take a look at HARMONY-6394 and approve applying the patch to the current 5.0 stream to regain RI compatibility for M12? Fingers crossed this is the last blocker for M12. Please call out any test results showing remaining

Re: [testing] M12 fix candidate HARMONY-6394

2009-11-30 Thread Mark Hindess
In message 4b13fed3.7040...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes: Would a committer please take a look at HARMONY-6394 and approve applying the patch to the current 5.0 stream to regain RI compatibility for M12? +1 looks good to me. -Mark

Re: [testing] M12 fix candidate HARMONY-6394

2009-11-30 Thread Tim Ellison
On 30/Nov/2009 21:28, Mark Hindess wrote: In message 4b13fed3.7040...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes: Would a committer please take a look at HARMONY-6394 and approve applying the patch to the current 5.0 stream to regain RI compatibility for M12? +1 looks good to me. Thanks Mark. Fixed at

[admin] Automated Monthly Reminder

2009-11-30 Thread tellison
This is a monthly automated mailing to the Apache Harmony dev list. The Apache Harmony project welcomes the participation and input of anyone interested in open source Java platform, the goal of our project. For more information about the Apache Harmony project, please see the project website.