In message 201002170600.o1h609fd003...@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com,
Mark Hindess writes:
In message 3b3f27c61002162003o350b3a73w2c256ea7dc164...@mail.gmail.com,
Nathan Beyer writes:
Instead of putting the dependencies in SVN, can we just download
them from the Maven Central
FYI: These builds are broken because at 21:03 UTC yesterday someone[0]
moved the ~hudson/.ant directory which meant that ecj/junit are no
longer in the ANT_LIB path. I've fixed this by creating a new .ant/lib
directory and placing junit/ecj in it.
-Mark
[0] A likely candidate is visible in the
Hi all,
Looking forward to the next attempt at getting java6 M1 out the door, I
ran the full test suite on Windows XP x86 and see 5 failures and 10
errors. I'll raise JIRAs for the ones below I think will need looking at
for java6 M1.
I don't think these failures should block M1:
After a full rebuild and retest these beans tests are now passing for
me. Something must have been broken in my workspace. I'm starting a new
thread to cover the failures I see now.
Regards,
Oliver
On 16/02/2010 17:37, Oliver Deakin wrote:
I'm seeing 51 failures in IntrospectorTest in the
Fixing and adding more dependencies has improved the JAPI results for
Java 6 from 93.21% to 95.86%. Reducing the missing packages from 34
to just 9 (without adding to the incompatibilities).
There is surprisingly little red left on:
It isn't a huge amount of code, but out of curiosity why implement this
from scratch rather than using:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/annotation/
(It was this commit that prompted me to look again at the dependencies
that might fill gaps in our implementation.)
In message 4b7bee13.70...@googlemail.com, Oliver Deakin writes:
Hi all,
Looking forward to the next attempt at getting java6 M1 out the door, I
ran the full test suite on Windows XP x86 and see 5 failures and 10
errors. I'll raise JIRAs for the ones below I think will need looking at
On 17/02/2010 14:43, Mark Hindess wrote:
In message4b7bee13.70...@googlemail.com, Oliver Deakin writes:
Hi all,
Looking forward to the next attempt at getting java6 M1 out the door, I
ran the full test suite on Windows XP x86 and see 5 failures and 10
errors. I'll raise JIRAs for the ones
I noticed something weird in commit 910980:
Author: hindessm
Date: Wed Feb 17 14:07:42 2010
New Revision: 910980
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910980view=rev
Log:
Thought I'd reverted this already ... reverting r903454. See:
http://markmail.org/thread/cdxlmi26mjgor3om
Modified:
In message a43fbc6a1002170835l7d149233ib59d091500956...@mail.gmail.com,
Jesse Wilson writes:
I noticed something weird in commit 910980:
Author: hindessm
Date: Wed Feb 17 14:07:42 2010
New Revision: 910980
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910980view=rev
Log:
Thought I'd reverted
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Mark Hindess
mark.hind...@googlemail.comwrote:
I have solid evidence that this change is wrong... it breaks Harmony
tests that pass on the RI. I've no solid evidence that this change is
required. So my inclination is not to put the check back.
That's
In message a43fbc6a1002171030p15b49041pee64ed782ad56...@mail.gmail.com,
Jesse Wilson writes:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Mark Hindess
mark.hind...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have solid evidence that this change is wrong... it breaks Harmony
tests that pass on the RI. I've no solid
In message 20100217192622.3b6b8478...@athena.apache.org, Mark Hindess writes:
In message a43fbc6a1002171030p15b49041pee64ed782ad56...@mail.gmail.com,
Jesse Wilson writes:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Mark Hindess
mark.hind...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have solid evidence that
In message 201002172019.o1hkjf33002...@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com,
Mark Hindess writes:
In message 20100217192622.3b6b8478...@athena.apache.org, Mark
Hindess writes:
In message
a43fbc6a1002171030p15b49041pee64ed782ad56...@mail.gmail.com, Jesse
Wilson writes:
On Wed, Feb 17,
14 matches
Mail list logo
