Re: [classlib][annotation]Add annotation processing APIs to Harmony 6

2010-08-10 Thread Jing Lv
Sounds great, thanks Ray. 2010/8/11 Ray Chen > Hi Jimmy, > I have created JIRA 6435 for this issue before. You can use that to track > :) > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Jimmy,Jing Lv > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I see in the API comparison [1], Harmony6 has reached 95.89% > compare

Re: [classlib][annotation]Add annotation processing APIs to Harmony 6

2010-08-10 Thread Ray Chen
Hi Jimmy, I have created JIRA 6435 for this issue before. You can use that to track :) On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Jimmy,Jing Lv wrote: > Hello, > >       I see in the API comparison [1], Harmony6 has reached 95.89% compared > to RI6 (that's amazing!). However there is still several packag

[classlib][annotation]Add annotation processing APIs to Harmony 6

2010-08-10 Thread Jimmy,Jing Lv
Hello, I see in the API comparison [1], Harmony6 has reached 95.89% compared to RI6 (that's amazing!). However there is still several packages 100% missing, e.g, javax.annotation.processing and its related package javax. lang.model.*, or even java.tools. Reading into the javadoc, I f

Re: [luni] ObjectInputStream.java

2010-08-10 Thread Mark Hindess
In message , Matthias Wessendorf writes: > > Hello, > > looking at ObjectInputStream.java, > > static { > PRIMITIVE_CLASSES.put("byte", byte.class); //$NON-NLS-1$ > PRIMITIVE_CLASSES.put("short", short.class); //$NON-NLS-1$ > PRIMITIVE_CLASSES.put("int", int.class); /

[luni] ObjectInputStream.java

2010-08-10 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hello, looking at ObjectInputStream.java, static { PRIMITIVE_CLASSES.put("byte", byte.class); //$NON-NLS-1$ PRIMITIVE_CLASSES.put("short", short.class); //$NON-NLS-1$ PRIMITIVE_CLASSES.put("int", int.class); //$NON-NLS-1$ PRIMITIVE_CLASSES.put("long", long.clas