Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4

2010-11-29 Thread Charles Lee
java5 test results: TestsFailuresErrorsSuccess rateTime19441 5 3 99.96%1589.661 All FailuresClassNameStatusTypeTime(s)VariableTableTest testVariableTableTest001 FailureMethod::VariableTable command, Error Code:<101(ABSENT_INFORMATION)> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Method::VariableTable

Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4

2010-11-29 Thread Ray Chen
Hi Mark, Does release manager must be a PMC? If not, maybe I can take the responsibility. However, I don't know much about how to do it, I think we need some transferring work. If it has to be a PMC, I think we have to wait for a volunteer. On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Mark Hindess wrote: >

Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4

2010-11-29 Thread Mark Hindess
Ray, Your enthusiasm is commendable but if we still don't have a volunteer to be release manager then there wont be any milestone releases. When I integrated my build changes I made a mistake and subsequently jdwp was being built in release mode when it hadn't been previously. The optimized code

Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4

2010-11-29 Thread Ray Chen
I have run test tests of trunk on linux platform: I got 10 test failures and 2 test errors failures: java.awt.AccessibleAWTWindowTest.testGetAccessibleStateSet javax.swing.JComponent_MultithreadedTest.testRequestFocusInWindowboolean javax.swing.JComponent_MultithreadedTest.testRevalidate javax.swi

Decline

2010-11-29 Thread jcrodriguez
> Hi All, > > I am a developer of the IKVM which based on the OpenJDK. I am working on > the AWT implementation. That I have look many times on the sources of the > OpenJDK. That it is not possible to contribute directly to Harmony. > > I can create many bug reports that show our compatibility test