ete this API coverage. Is there anyone interested
in? And IIRC, Andrew or someone also do some work for this. has all
your patches been committed, Andrew?
[1] http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/japi/htmlout/h-jdk15-harmony.html
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Andrew Zhang wrote:
On 4/19/07, Ruth Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/4/19, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 4/19/07, LvJimmy$B!$(BJing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 2007/4/19, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
2007/4/19, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 4/19/07, LvJimmy,Jing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2007/4/19, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 4/19/07, Ruth Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Tim Ellison wrote:
> >
Tim Ellison wrote:
Ruth Cao wrote:
You are right, Vladimir.
It is just because the 'port' variable is set to 8080 and on some
machines this port has already been occupied. The test case will pass
if we use Support_PortManager.getNextPort() on my side.
Please don
patch for
this JIRA. Sorry for any inconvenience caused.
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
I think it depends on environment. On my box this test failed on IBMVM
too.
Thanks, Vladimir
On 4/17/07, Ruth Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir,
I provide this patch and it passes on my side (IBMVME/W
was added by commit:
Author: ndbeyer
Date: Mon Apr 16 19:30:11 2007
New Revision: 529472
Should we fix this test or revert this commit?
thanks, Vladimir
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
ating branch for Java 6
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Against creating branch for Java 6 and reason
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
Thanks,
Stepan Mishura
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
o 2.9.
Shall we revert it back? Or any comments? suggestions?
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
more, the method currently seems no
use at all, and luni test passed without it.
Do someone the use (or history) of the method? If no, I'd like
add a patch to delete it.
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
, Vladimir
Hello Vladimir,
I've attached a patch for Harmony-3437 (t.a.j.u.TimerTaskTest). Would
you pls try and verify if it works on your side? Thanks a lot.
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
this test intermittently failed on the overloaded box. The
issue Harmony-3437 was created to track it.
Could somebody take care about this issue?
Thanks, Vladimir
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
2007/3/15, Andrew Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 3/15/07, Ruth Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> When trying to take tests.api.java.net.URLTest out of exclude list, I
> found a test case which requires a FTP server. Unfortunately, we do not
> have suc
feasible:
1) Use ftp://ftp.sun.com :-[ It is the FTP server used by TCK and
relatively stable, but is there any legal issue for this?
2) Find some other embedded FTP server project, such as Apache FTP
server or so.
Any comments or suggestion is highly welcome. Thanks a lot.
--
Regards,
Ruth
168.99.99
at
tests.api.java.net.SocketPermissionTest.test_impliesLjava_security_Permission(SocketPermissionTest.java:170)
at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(VMReflection.java)
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
to host:
spseroom04.cps./192.168.99.99
at
tests.api.java.net.SocketPermissionTest.test_impliesLjava_security_Permission(SocketPermissionTest.java:170)
at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.invokeMethod(VMReflection.java)
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
If no one objects, I'll raise a JIRA and create a patch to let the test
pass on both RI and Harmony. Thanks.
Ruth Cao wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 3/7/07, Ruth Cao wrote:
Hi all,
When I'm looking at the exclude lists in the security module, I've
ock_freeaddrinfo, free is called on unintialized pointer which
leads to a crash.
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 3/7/07, Ruth Cao wrote:
Hi all,
When I'm looking at the exclude lists in the security module, I've found
that the test_impliesLjava_security_Permission method in
t.a.j.security.PermissionCollectionTest fails on both RI and Harmony.
Looking more deeply into t
-org.apache.harmony.security.tests.java.security.cert.CertificateFactory4Test.xml
thanks, Vladimir
--
Regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Hi all,
When I'm looking at the exclude lists in the security module, I've found
that the test_impliesLjava_security_Permission method in
t.a.j.security.PermissionCollectionTest fails on both RI and Harmony.
Looking more deeply into the code, I think the main reason may be that
the 'coucou.Fi
Hi Vladimir,
I'll look into this issue since the patch is provided by me. Thanks.
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
The 'archive' tests passed on x86_64 for r514595 and failed for r514596:
Modified:
harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/portlib/src/main/native/port/unix/hysock.c
Thnanks, Vladimir
O
deBase' feature in policy file
--
Key: HARMONY-2910
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2910
Project: Harmony
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Cla
sion of Jetty.
>> > >
>> > > Another way is tha find out another tool to set up a proxy
>> server. In
>> > > my opinion, we'd better not import another dependency if
>> possible. And
>> > > if it is not an embedding server, we have to write some ugly
>> code in
>> > > order to run test automatically.
>> > >
>> > > suggestions?concerns?
>
> --
> Alexei Zakharov,
> Intel ESSD
--
Best regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
ption? :)
>
> It may be much harder to detect
It's really a problem, but I think it can be solved in the similar way.
That is, using the read-only mark in the RandomAccessFile constructor.
I'll soon improve the existing patch. Thanks so much for the reminde
oesn't effect real
> provider implementations.
Agree. So for me there is no sense to keep the check.
Thanks,
Stepan.
> I prefer to save the current Harmony behavior and mark this issue as
> non-bug difference. But another decision is also OK
>
>
> On 1/24/07, Ruth Cao <[EMA
agree with Spark. It should be considered as non bug difference.
On 1/23/07, Ruth Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/1/23, Spark Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > IMO, all these engineXXX methods are from it's super class
> > MessageDigestSpi.
> > A
service providers who wish to
supply their own implementations of message digest algorithms.
So, this exception thrown senario is implementation dependent. I'd prefer
to
regards it as non bug difference.
Best regards
2007/1/23, Ruth Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello all,
>
>
ult", 0, md.digest(b, 2, 3));
//$NON-NLS-1$
}
--
Best regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
2007/1/22, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 1/19/07, Ruth Cao wrote:
>
> 2007/1/19, Stepan Mishura:
> >
> > On 1/19/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/19/07, Ruth Cao wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > &g
2007/1/19, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 1/19/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
>
> On 1/19/07, Ruth Cao wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > When working on HARMONY-2910, we've found that current Harmony code
does
> > not
> > support relative
are enough interests to
participate, we can invite Geir to join us as well. :-)
If you don't want to speak in this list, please drop me an email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Depending on the geo distribution, we need
firstly decide which city is the best place to meet. Cheers!
Thanks,
xiaofeng
--
Bes
me some suggestion? Thanks in advance.
--
Best regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
omeone complains they need more time.
--
Best regards,
Ruth Cao
China Software Development Lab, IBM
33 matches
Mail list logo