On 09/Nov/2009 22:31, Jesse Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't mean to ask Why is a CopyOnWriteArrayList useful?, rather
what did it contribute to your logging improvements, e.g. correctness
that would require tons of duplicate
On 10/Nov/2009 03:52, Nathan Beyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't mean to ask Why is a CopyOnWriteArrayList useful?, rather
what did it contribute to your
On 10/Nov/2009 19:38, Jesse Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Mark Hindess
mark.hind...@googlemail.comwrote:
Since they aren't active on the list I'm not sure how much we should let
this influence our decision. It does suggest that we should be cautious
about making
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 02:44, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/Nov/2009 22:31, Jesse Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't mean to ask Why is a CopyOnWriteArrayList useful?, rather
what did it contribute to your logging
In message 96933a4d0911121432mb5e0d88we33965c32c578...@mail.gmail.com,
enh writes:
[btw, i followed the link, but didn't really understand what i was
looking at or how it demonstrated the case.]
Sorry, I probably assumed too much history[0]. That link pointed to a
list of files that changed
In message a43fbc6a0910270932x785b1a64pf454995f940a9...@mail.gmail.com,
Jesse Wilson writes:
How do you feel about saying the core is LUUUNI ?
- lang
- util
- util.concurrent.*
- util.jar
- util.regex
- util.logging
- util.prefs
- util.zip
- net
- io
This feels like a
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Mark Hindess
mark.hind...@googlemail.comwrote:
Since they aren't active on the list I'm not sure how much we should let
this influence our decision. It does suggest that we should be cautious
about making assumptions about what downstream users might like to
On 27/Oct/2009 16:32, Jesse Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
The improvement in performance is impressive. What is the contribution
made by the use of the CopyOnWriteArrayList?
CopyOnWriteArrayList is ideal for situations when the
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't mean to ask Why is a CopyOnWriteArrayList useful?, rather
what did it contribute to your logging improvements, e.g. correctness
that would require tons of duplicate coding otherwise, or performance
numbers, etc.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't mean to ask Why is a CopyOnWriteArrayList useful?, rather
what did it contribute to your logging improvements, e.g. correctness
that
On 26/Oct/2009 20:33, Jesse Wilson (JIRA) wrote:
Logging performance improvements
Key: HARMONY-6362
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6362
Project: Harmony
Issue Type: Improvement
Good question. We may face more and more similar cases in future as
multi-core is the trend. an ideal solution is to detect if there is
concurrent module in classpath then we load it and use the improved
implementation otherwise we go back to the original.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Tim
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
The improvement in performance is impressive. What is the contribution
made by the use of the CopyOnWriteArrayList?
CopyOnWriteArrayList is ideal for situations when the following are all
true:
- reads are frequent
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
