On 4/19/07, Tony Wu wrote:
Hi Stepan,
I noticed that you copied the java6 from java6-branch, so we should
start at r529549 rather than r530247 when we need merge the updates
from trunk to java6. Am I right?
Yes, I think that we merge updated starting at r529549 (when the
branch was created).
Hi Stepan,
I noticed that you copied the java6 from java6-branch, so we should
start at r529549 rather than r530247 when we need merge the updates
from trunk to java6. Am I right?
On 4/19/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/18/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer
On 4/18/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer wrote:
> If there aren't any objections, I'd like to rename it soon, while
> everything is still fresh.
>
Agree. We can do it in the next way: we wait during 24 hours and if
there are no objections I'll rename it.
Done at r530247.
-S
+1 to rename
2007/4/18, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Cool, thanks.
On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer wrote:
> > If there aren't any objections, I'd like to rename it soon, while
> > everything is still fresh.
> >
>
> Agree. We can do it in the
Cool, thanks.
On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer wrote:
> If there aren't any objections, I'd like to rename it soon, while
> everything is still fresh.
>
Agree. We can do it in the next way: we wait during 24 hours and if
there are no objections I'll
On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer wrote:
If there aren't any objections, I'd like to rename it soon, while
everything is still fresh.
Agree. We can do it in the next way: we wait during 24 hours and if
there are no objections I'll rename it.
-Stepan.
-Nathan
On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> On 4
If there aren't any objections, I'd like to rename it soon, while
everything is still fresh.
-Nathan
On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer wrote:
> I don't mean to be picky, but why the name "java6-branch" [1]? The
> parent folder is already "branches";
On 4/18/07, Nathan Beyer wrote:
I don't mean to be picky, but why the name "java6-branch" [1]? The
parent folder is already "branches"; can we just rename it to "java6"?
I don't have strong preference for that. I saw branch's names in
repositories with "branch" suffix and without. So no object
On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/16/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 4/16/07, Spark Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > +1.
> > > >
> >
I don't mean to be picky, but why the name "java6-branch" [1]? The
parent folder is already "branches"; can we just rename it to "java6"?
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/classlib/branches/java6-branch/
-Nathan
On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Done at
Done at r529549.
I've create the branch and added 'java6' property to federated build.
So to build Harmony using federated build with Java 6 classlibrary it
should be set (for example, ant -Djava6=true)
Thanks,
Stepan.
On 4/17/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from Stepan,Tony,
On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/16/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/16/07, Spark Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > +1.
> > >
> > > But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out c
On 4/16/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/16/07, Spark Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1.
> >
> > But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out concurrent code
> > for 1.6?
> >
>
> That's only partially true
+1 from Stepan,Tony, Jimmy, Ruth, Paulex, Alexey Varlamov, Mikhail
Fursov, Egor, Oliver, Mikhail Loenko, Sian, Xiaofeng, Leo, Robert,
Alexey Petrenko, Kelvin, Sean, Gregory, Vikram, Spark.
no other votes so this passes.
I'm going to create a branch for class library and update federated build to
On 4/17/07, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/16/07, Spark Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1.
>
> But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out concurrent code
> for 1.6?
>
That's only partially true; there are some minor changes that have
been made on top of that cod
On 4/16/07, Spark Shen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1.
But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out concurrent code
for 1.6?
That's only partially true; there are some minor changes that have
been made on top of that code, as the code behind that tag has some
compile errors.
C
+1.
But I have a question. Which tag should be use to check out concurrent code
for 1.6?
Current concurrent code used for 1.5 is using URL:
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/?only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD
That is tag only_with_tag=JSR166_PFD.
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcv
+1 for classlib branch
On 4/13/07, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:
> On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
>> Stepan,
>> I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
>> i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
>> +1 for that
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
Stepan,
I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
+1 for that.
Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
+1 for classlib branch.
+1
2007/4/13, Kelvin Ye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1 for classlib branch
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > Stepan,
> > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module a
+1 for classlib branch
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> Stepan,
> I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> +1 for that.
>
Sorry for not being clear
+1
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
- [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
- [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
decision. So I'd like to start voting.
+1
On 4/12/07, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 4/12/07, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > > Stepan,
> > > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > >
+1
On 4/12/07, Xiao-Feng Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > Stepan,
> > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> >
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> Stepan,
> I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> +1 for that.
>
Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class libr
+1
On 12/04/07, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for classlib branch
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > Stepan,
> > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib mod
+1 for classlib branch
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> Stepan,
> I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> +1 for that.
>
Sorry for not being clear - yes, I
+1 for classlib branch.
Stepan Mishura wrote:
The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
- [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
- [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
decision. So I'd like to start voting.
[
On the 0x2B6 day of Apache Harmony Stepan Mishura wrote:
> On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > Stepan,
> > I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
> > i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
> > +1 for that.
> >
>
> Sorry for not being clear - yes, I
Stepan,
I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
+1 for that.
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1
-Stepan.
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> - [OT]
On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
Stepan,
I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
+1 for that.
Sorry for not being clear - yes, I meant class library branch.
-Stepan.
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROT
+1 - lets do the branch for classlib module
On 4/12/07, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stepan,
I suppose the vote needs more distinct/detailed subject announced,
i.e. create "java6" branch on classlib module as a pilot.
+1 for that.
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
+1 from me
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
- [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
- [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
decision. So I'd like to star
+1
Stepan Mishura wrote:
The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
- [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
- [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
decision. So I'd like to start voting.
[ ] +1 Accept creating
+1 :)
2007/4/12, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1
-Stepan.
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
>
> I think that it is better to make it a clear vo
+1 strongly
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
-Stepan.
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
> The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
> - [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
> - [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
>
> I think that it is better to make
+1
-Stepan.
On 4/12/07, Stepan Mishura wrote:
The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
- [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
- [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
decision. So I'd like to start voting.
[
The subject was discussed a lot in threads:
- [OT] JFYI: Dave Gilbert (jfree.org) on Apache Harmony
- [classlib]proposal: java6 kick off!
I think that it is better to make it a clear vote thread to do final
decision. So I'd like to start voting.
[ ] +1 Accept creating branch for Java 6
[ ] 0 No
38 matches
Mail list logo
