2010/7/8 enh e...@google.com
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 09:55, Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Deven You devyo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have written some simple benchmarks for harmony regex and find the
performance of harmony is poor compared to RI.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Deven You devyo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have written some simple benchmarks for harmony regex and find the
performance of harmony is poor compared to RI. For example, Mathcer.find()
only reach 60% of that of RI. I heard Android use icu4jni re-implement this
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 09:55, Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Deven You devyo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have written some simple benchmarks for harmony regex and find the
performance of harmony is poor compared to RI. For example, Mathcer.find()
only
-- Forwarded message --
From: Deven You devyo...@gmail.com
Date: 2010/7/8
Subject: Re: A question about android regex implementation
To: enh e...@google.com
2010/7/8 enh e...@google.com
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 09:55, Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5
Hi Jesse and All,
I have written some simple benchmarks for harmony regex and find the
performance of harmony is poor compared to RI. For example, Mathcer.find()
only reach 60% of that of RI. I heard Android use icu4jni re-implement this
module. Since icu4jni use native code I think it may has
