Jesse Wilson wrote:
Harmony Team,
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in our Java code
that frustrates me. Our Java code frequently inverts conditions from their
natural language form. From HttpURLConnectionImpl:
if (null == resHeader) {
On 26/Oct/2009 21:57, Jesse Wilson wrote:
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in our Java code
that frustrates me. Our Java code frequently inverts conditions from their
natural language form.
I'm sure we all have our own horror stories. The ones that make me
cringe are
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/Oct/2009 21:57, Jesse Wilson wrote:
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in our Java code
that frustrates me. Our Java code frequently inverts conditions from their
natural language form.
I'm
On 27/Oct/2009 13:35, Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26/Oct/2009 21:57, Jesse Wilson wrote:
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in our Java code
that frustrates me. Our Java code frequently inverts conditions
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:21:14 +, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27/Oct/2009 13:35, Xiao-Feng Li wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 26/Oct/2009 21:57, Jesse Wilson wrote:
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in
Harmony Team,
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in our Java code
that frustrates me. Our Java code frequently inverts conditions from their
natural language form. From HttpURLConnectionImpl:
if (null == resHeader) {
resHeader = new Header();
The construction which kills me is:
if some string.equals(str) instead of if str.equals(some string)
But unfortunately the first form is better then second one :)
Alexey
2009/10/27 Jesse Wilson jessewil...@google.com:
Harmony Team,
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in
In message a43fbc6a0910261457r73912ed5k70e90e558908b...@mail.gmail.com,
Jesse Wilson writes:
Harmony Team,
Continuing along with a theme, there's another C/C++ism in our Java
code that frustrates me. Our Java code frequently inverts conditions
from their natural language form. From
On 26/10/2009, Alexey Petrenko alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
The construction which kills me is:
if some string.equals(str) instead of if str.equals(some string)
But unfortunately the first form is better then second one :)
Surely it's only better if the str variable can be null?
