The conversation sort of got derailed, but from what I gathered, we
can leave the unchanged files as is, but we should inject the header
to files that we have changed [1].
It was also suggested that we place an entry in NOTICE to recognize
the contribution of the code to the public. There was
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Nathan Beyer ndbe...@apache.org wrote:
This reminds me, we need to put the standard Apache header on all
these files. Since they are under public domain (not actually a
license), we are actually taken ownership of the files. We can check
with legal-discuss@ if
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:33 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/08/2009, Nathan Beyer ndbe...@apache.org wrote:
This reminds me, we need to put the standard Apache header on all
these files. Since they are under public domain (not actually a
license), we are actually taken ownership of the
This reminds me, we need to put the standard Apache header on all
these files. Since they are under public domain (not actually a
license), we are actually taken ownership of the files. We can check
with legal-discuss@ if anyone has concerns.
-Nathan
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:12 AM,
