Jesse Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Oliver Deakin oliver.dea...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to just relax the constraints on
hysock_connect_with_timeout?
Sure, what would you suggest? I believe the reason the portlib
Jesse Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 6:32 AM, odea...@apache.org wrote:
Author: odeakin
Date: Fri Oct 23 13:32:06 2009
New Revision: 829056
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=829056view=rev
Log:
The port library hysock_connect_with_timeout() function only takes an
unsigned 32bit
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Oliver Deakin oliver.dea...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to just relax the constraints on
hysock_connect_with_timeout?
Sure, what would you suggest? I believe the reason the portlib function was
implemented this way (only a short
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 6:32 AM, odea...@apache.org wrote:
Author: odeakin
Date: Fri Oct 23 13:32:06 2009
New Revision: 829056
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=829056view=rev
Log:
The port library hysock_connect_with_timeout() function only takes an
unsigned 32bit value as a timeout
