Re: Moving Apache Harmony to the Attic

2011-10-29 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Am 29.10.2011 11:02, schrieb Tim Ellison: Back in March I wrote [1] about the choice facing our community to either find a new goal for Apache Harmony, or move the project under the responsibility of the Apache Attic project [2]. There has been no significant activity in Apache Harmony since,

Re: Moving Apache Harmony to the Attic

2011-10-29 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Am 29.10.2011 14:53, schrieb Tim Ellison: On 29/10/2011 10:13, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Sounds right... Too sad to see this happening. Will the code remain in an svn repo? I don't see much in the attic svn repo. The process is described here [1]. The Harmony SVN will be marked read-only,

[general] specialized JVM for Groovy

2011-06-04 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Hi all, I noticed that there is recently not much going on in harmony, but I hope there are still enough people to react to this mail. As one implementing a dynamic language for the JVM, namely Groovy, I continuously have to fight the JVM in so many terms, that I am wondering if it would

Re: [general] specialized JVM for Groovy

2011-06-04 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Am 04.06.2011 15:45, schrieb Alexei Fedotov: Jochen, AFAIU, you have some problems with Oracle Java implementation. What do you expect from Apache Harmony? Do you want to hack into the Apache Harmony code? What I want from Harmony is that it allows me to change the internals of the JVM. For

Re: [general] specialized JVM for Groovy

2011-06-04 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Am 04.06.2011 16:35, schrieb Krystal Mok: Hi Jochen, What you proposed sure is technically feasible, but whether it'd happen in Harmony, that's another story. Oh I don't expect you guys to do that, I would do my own changed version. The three big JVMs, namely HotSpot, JRockit and J9 all