,
Tim
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
NIO or JNI questions? Mail me/drop by/add me as a reviewer.
in mind for the separation
so that you can easily avoid them? (cue perennial debate about testing
structure/package names/test names/annotations/...)
Regards,
Tim
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
obviously,
there's no support for CANON_EQ, but there are a variety of more
subtle incompatibilities too.
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
specifically.
The closest I've seen to this is the jDocs.com site that presents a spec
/ code / books / wiki view across the APIs.
Regards,
Tim
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
on writing these docs because we're
not afraid to point out mistakes.
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
something?
was the intention to iterate through the map and try to round-trip for
each charset in the map?
(this is on the java 6 branch.)
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
to believe that GCC wouldn't mangle the 5.2
code in the same way.
(the GCC bug is fixed.)
so as far as we know, 5.3 should be fine.
--elliott
If not, I think we should upgrade it after M13 released.
--
Best Regards,
Regis.
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
null.
Regards,
Mark.
[0] Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send.
- Jon Postel
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
of applications (including our generated parser?) use it in this way.
And if we return a subclass of ZipInputStream (which we do) we need to honor
the contract of InputStream.available(), which promises to return 1 or 0...
s/InputStream/ZipInputStream/
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http
Correct.
On Nov 27, 2009 1:10 PM, Nathan Beyer ndbe...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Oliver Deakin oliver.dea...@googlemail.com
wrote:Tim Ellis...
Isn't this still incorrect? The available() method isn't equivalent to
what's left in the stream - it's just what's
) {
+ bytesRead += i;
+ }
+ return i;
+ }
+
+ public int available() throws IOException {
+ return super.available() == 0 ? 0 : (int) (entry.getSize()
- bytesRead);
+ }
+ }
}
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http
handling code themselves to be self-sufficient.
Regards,
Tim
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:13, Tim Ellison t.p.elli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/Nov/2009 06:14, enh wrote:
Is noone concerned about pooping this ebcdic cruft all over the place?
Shouldn't it be factored out into an isNewline method somewhere?
Where are they all? A grep of the code, which
Is noone concerned about pooping this ebcdic cruft all over the place?
Shouldn't it be factored out into an isNewline method somewhere?
On Nov 9, 2009 10:10 PM, Ray Chen clrayc...@gmail.com wrote:
Shall we store the return value of out.position()-1 to avoid invoking it
twice?
If it is too tiny
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 02:28, Mark Hindess mark.hind...@googlemail.com wrote:
In message 4af3f7de.3020...@gmail.com, Tim Ellison writes:
On 06/Nov/2009 03:06, Regis wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
In message 96933a4d0911051045p61431af5ie2cecb850a622...@mail.gmail.com,
enh writes:
On Wed
conjunct is
false, though.)
--elliott
Making the available call (or part of it) a single native method call
is a separate issue.
Regards,
Mark.
--
Best Regards,
Regis.
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
isn't as
forceful on Linux.
That's not to say we shouldn't fix it. I just thought I'd mention it
in case anyone else is trying the same thing or in case anyone has any
other ideas on reproducing on our supported platforms.
-Mark.
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org
, yeah, an intention-revealing int OSFileSystem.available(int
fd) for the Java side, and letting the native side worry about how
best to implement it sounds like a good idea.
--
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/
18 matches
Mail list logo
