Re: compile hbase in linux and windows problem

2011-03-23 Thread Zhoushuaifeng
Hi, See my answer inline below start with //zhou: -邮件原件- 发件人: saint@gmail.com [mailto:saint@gmail.com] 代表 Stack 发送时间: 2011年3月22日 13:07 收件人: dev@hbase.apache.org 主题: Re: compile hbase in linux and windows problem 2011/3/21 Zhoushuaifeng zhoushuaif...@huawei.com: My linux is

Re: compile hbase in linux and windows problem

2011-03-23 Thread Zhoushuaifeng
Now I get hbase-0.90.1.tar.gz by [mvn clean -DskipTests install assembly:single]. when I execute [mvn clean install assembly:single],some tests are NG. Does it mean that hbase-0.90.1.tar.gz (got by [mvn clean -DskipTests install assembly:single]) is wrong? so I plan to analyze this problem.

google snappy

2011-03-23 Thread Weishung Chung
Hey my fellow hadoop/hbase developers, I just came across this google compression/decompression package yesterday, could we make a good use of this compression scheme in hadoop? It's written in C++ though. http://code.google.com/p/snappy/ http://code.google.com/p/snappy/I haven't looked close

Re: google snappy

2011-03-23 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
(Please don't cross-post like that, it only adds confusion. I put everything in bcc and posted to general instead) Their README says the following: Snappy usually is faster than algorithms in the same class (e.g. LZO, LZF, FastLZ, QuickLZ, etc.) while achieving comparable compression ratios.

Re: google snappy

2011-03-23 Thread Segel, Mike
Lol... It's already in the works... Sent from my Palm Pre , Please excuse any spelling errors. On Mar 23, 2011 11:53 AM, Weishung Chung weish...@gmail.com wrote: Hey my fellow hadoop/hbase developers, I just came across this google compression/decompression

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK #1804

2011-03-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/HBase-TRUNK/1804/changes Changes: [apurtell] HBASE-3468 Enhance checkAndPut and checkAndDelete with comparators -- [...truncated 3129 lines...] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:

Fwd: Review Request: Improvements to Hbck and better error reporting

2011-03-23 Thread Marc Limotte
Hey. Are we still using ReviewBoard for Hbase? I put up a patch for hbck, but the auto-generated email from ReviewBoard was blocked as spam. Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3695http://review.cloudera.org/r/1661/ Marc -- Forwarded message -- From: Marc Limotte

Jenkins build is back to normal : hbase-0.90 #131

2011-03-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/hbase-0.90/131/changes

hbase-2001 added getZooKeeperWatcher and getCatalogTracker to RegionServerServices but these two methods are in Server

2011-03-23 Thread Stack
It looks like hbase-2001 added some overlap between the Server and RegionServerServices Interfaces. Here's the commit that added it: commit c1dd72441d376e62615a0ec92f09515521ccb99b Author: Andrew Kyle Purtell apurt...@apache.org Date: Sat Nov 20 01:23:39 2010 + HBASE-2001

Re: hbase-2001 added getZooKeeperWatcher and getCatalogTracker to RegionServerServices but these two methods are in Server

2011-03-23 Thread Andrew Purtell
-1 We need these for the AccessController coprocessor to work. May see more of this going forward. If wrong place need for some other way for the coprocessor to get it from HRegion. --- On Wed, 3/23/11, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote: From: Stack st...@duboce.net Subject: Re: hbase-2001

Re: hbase-2001 added getZooKeeperWatcher and getCatalogTracker to RegionServerServices but these two methods are in Server

2011-03-23 Thread Stack
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Gary Helmling ghelml...@gmail.com wrote: RegionServerServices is made available to RegionObserver coprocessors via RegionCoprocessorEnvironment.  The intent was to allow coprocessors to have limited access to the region server in context.  The same is true for

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK #1805

2011-03-23 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/HBase-TRUNK/1805/changes Changes: [jdcryans] HBASE-3640 [replication] Transferring queues shouldn't be done inline with RS startup -- [...truncated 3129 lines...] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0,