Re: why not obtain row lock when geting a row

2011-03-28 Thread jiangwen w
so client may read dirty data, considering the following case client#1 update firstName and lastName for a user. client#2 read the information of the user when client#1 updated firstName and will update lastName. so client#1 read the latest firstName, but the old lastName. Sincerely On Mon, Mar

Re: why not obtain row lock when geting a row

2011-03-28 Thread Ryan Rawson
That is not the case, please see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2248 There are alternative mechanisms (outlined in that JIRA) to assure atomic row reads. -ryan On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:54 PM, jiangwen w wjiang...@gmail.com wrote: so client may read dirty data, considering the

Re: disk seek in range search

2011-03-28 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans
This isn't Iron Chef American Idol All Stars HBase Edition, showing that you can actually provide some form of answer is already a #win by itself. J-D On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Weishung Chung weish...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Jean for the reading materials, I've been reading the

ReSend: Fwd: ANN: hbase 0.90.2 Release Candidate 0 available for download

2011-03-28 Thread Stack
Resending Ted's vote. He got a failure trying to post the list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com Date: Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:27 AM Subject: Re: ANN: hbase 0.90.2 Release Candidate 0 available for download To: dev@hbase.apache.org Cc: Stack