ok for me.
I will update the .pom the doc today
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
From Stack:
---
I think we can have it so everyone gets what they need;
small/medium/large are done by surefire and then we have a new
intergration test green field that
See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.90/353/changes
Changes:
[stack] HBASE-4900 Fix javadoc warnings out on 0.90 branch
[stack] HBASE-4352 Apply version of hbase-4015 to branch
[stack] HBASE-4352 Apply version of hbase-4015 to branch
--
Hi Lars,
Done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4903
What's the best option to solve this?
Thanks,
Daniel
On Nov 30, 2011, at 15:10 , Lars George wrote:
Hi Daniel,
This indeed looks like an oversight. Could you create a JIRA for it please?
Thanks,
Lars
On Nov 30, 2011,
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/2501/changes
Changes:
[dmeil] hbase-4898. book.xml (1 correction in no-reducer summary)
troubleshooting.xml 1 addition for MapReduce related documentation.
[dmeil] hbase-4897 book.xml (clarified scan example), troubleshooting.xml (mr
example)
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jesse Yates jesse.k.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if we should consider the integration tests as the primary
thing that bigtop runs. Since they are deploying to a small cluster
(right?), the tests that FB is supposed to be open sourcing soon should
+bigtop-dev
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Chatting w/ Roman and Mikhail yesterday at the Hackathon, and with a
probably broader goals than perhaps what you've been thinking on
Jesse, I think:
+ IntegrationTests* -- where IntegrationTest* is tests with the
(sending to user@ and putting dev@ in bcc, this is not an HBase dev question)
zookeeper usually binds 0.0.0.0 so it's reachable from any interface
but if 192.168.0.180 is binding to the loopback interface then it
won't listen to the other interfaces. If HBase is really running
properly then your
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/2502/changes
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
The first hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-0/
Took RC0 for a spin in Bigtop. Here are the findings so far:
1. tarball has an extra level of
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:
I've been appointed secretary for today's hack day. The notes are
online and editable here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19NVY8eaC-0WWKxY6UgeqaYK-J3c2YMtfcrGgwCtwG4g/edit?hl=en_US
I've set it to be editable by anyone,
Hello,
I am getting the following when trying to create a table from the
load-tester tool ported from 0.89-fb (https://reviews.facebook.net/D549).
It is weird that configuration instantiation fails given that it succeeded
earlier in the tool's workflow. Does anyone know why are we instantiating a
Hi devs,
Patch attached.
Feedback welcome
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4440
thanks a lot
Sujee
http://sujee.net
Glad this was just a false alarm.
If you do try out security features, or believe you see errors as a consequence
of them going in, I am very interested in hearing about it, even if a false
alarm, and will take care of it if there is a real issue.
Best regards,
- Andy
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
Glad this was just a false alarm.
If you do try out security features, or believe you see errors as a
consequence of them going in,
I am very interested in hearing about it, even if a false alarm, and will
take care
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
Glad this was just a false alarm.
If you do try out security features, or believe you see errors as a
consequence of them going in,
I am very
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
The first hbase 0.92.0 release candidate is available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.92.0-candidate-0/
Took RC0 for a spin in
Roman,
There are some out of date blog posts which need rework into proper
documentation. Gary Helmling was talking about doing this, to be committed into
the HBase xml book. Gary, do you still have interest and time for doing this?
- Andy
From: Roman
Adding dev list to get some suggestions.
Regards
Ram
-Original Message-
From: Shrijeet Paliwal [mailto:shrij...@rocketfuel.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 8:08 AM
To: u...@hbase.apache.org
Cc: Gaojinchao; Chenjian
Subject: Re: Suspected memory leak
Jieshan,
We backported
Could someone correct the name as Swati, not Swathi, from eBay? Thanks in
advance! -Thomas
On 11/30/11 3:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:
I've been appointed secretary for today's hack day. The notes are
My bad, sorry for the typo!
-Todd
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Pan, Thomas th...@ebay.com wrote:
Could someone correct the name as Swati, not Swathi, from eBay? Thanks in
advance! -Thomas
On 11/30/11 3:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:33 PM,
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK-security/17/changes
Changes:
[karthik] HBASE-4463 [jira] Run more aggressive compactions during off peak
hours
Summary:
HBASE-4463 Run more aggressive compactions during off peak hours
Increases the compact selection ratio from 1.3 to 5 at
21 matches
Mail list logo
