HBase coprocessors blog posted

2012-02-01 Thread Mingjie Lai
Hi hbasers. A hbase blog regarding coprocessors has been posted to apache blog site. Here is the link: https://blogs.apache.org/hbase/entry/coprocessor_introduction Your comments are welcome. Thanks, Mingjie

Re: HBase coprocessors blog posted

2012-02-01 Thread Gaojinchao
Great job! We will use the feature! -邮件原件- 发件人: Mingjie Lai [mailto:m...@apache.org] 发送时间: 2012年2月1日 16:26 收件人: u...@hbase.apache.org; dev@hbase.apache.org 主题: HBase coprocessors blog posted Hi hbasers. A hbase blog regarding coprocessors has been posted to apache blog site. Here is

Re: HBase coprocessors blog posted

2012-02-01 Thread Doug Meil
I'll make sure the book links to this. On 2/1/12 3:26 AM, Mingjie Lai m...@apache.org wrote: Hi hbasers. A hbase blog regarding coprocessors has been posted to apache blog site. Here is the link: https://blogs.apache.org/hbase/entry/coprocessor_introduction Your comments are welcome.

Re: HBase coprocessors blog posted

2012-02-01 Thread Jonathan Hsieh
Mingjie, Great post. It would be great if we have other major features written up at this level (what it means for users and some of the guts) posted on the Apache HBase blog! Jon. On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Mingjie Lai m...@apache.org wrote: Hi hbasers. A hbase blog regarding

Re: HBase coprocessors blog posted

2012-02-01 Thread Gary Helmling
Great work, Mingjie! On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote: Mingjie, Great post.  It would be great if we have other major features written up at this level (what it means for users and some of the guts) posted on the Apache HBase blog! Jon. On Wed, Feb

Re: HBase coprocessors blog posted

2012-02-01 Thread Stack
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Mingjie Lai m...@apache.org wrote: Hi hbasers. A hbase blog regarding coprocessors has been posted to apache blog site. Here is the link: https://blogs.apache.org/hbase/entry/coprocessor_introduction Your comments are welcome. Thanks for doing this

Jenkins build is back to normal : HBase-0.92 #269

2012-02-01 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92/269/

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK #2650

2012-02-01 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/2650/changes Changes: [tedyu] HBASE-5212 Fix test TestTableMapReduce against 0.23 (Ted and Gregory) [tedyu] HBASE-5295 Improve the Thrift API to switch on/off writing to wal for Mutations (Dhruba) [tedyu] HBASE-5310 HConnectionManager server cache

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK #2651

2012-02-01 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/2651/ -- [...truncated 1996 lines...] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 27.499 sec Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestWALObserver Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0,

Re: HBase coprocessors blog posted

2012-02-01 Thread Andrew Purtell
Gary, Eugene is resurrecting posts on security now. I was thinking you should be in the byline because of your many contributions. Is that ok? Want to make an edit pass?    - Andy   From: Gary Helmling ghelml...@gmail.com To: dev@hbase.apache.org Cc:

Re: hbase 0.94.0

2012-02-01 Thread Andrew Purtell
Hi, Traditionally there have been no guarantees of cross major version compatibility. RPC especially. Never a rolling upgrade from an 0.90 to an 0.92, for example. For persistent data, there is a migration utility for upping from one major release to the next. I'm advocating that RPC

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK-security #95

2012-02-01 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK-security/95/ -- [...truncated 2010 lines...] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestLoadIncrementalHFiles Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 32.247 sec Running

Re: MR job randomly scans up thousands of rows less than the it should.

2012-02-01 Thread Jonathan Hsieh
Cosmin, How many column families to you have in this table? Are you using any filters in you HBase scans? Are you using skip rows that may not have qualifiers present? There are a few known issues with multi-CF atomicity and a recent one about flushes that may be related to this problem.