Build failed in Jenkins: hbase-0.90 #474

See Changes: [stack] HBASE-5213 "hbase master stop" does not bring down backup masters -- [...truncated 1150 lines...] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.TestHLogSplit Tests run: 24, Fail

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK-security #175

See Changes: [stack] HBASE-5791 Apache project branding requirements: DOAP file [PATCH] [stack] HBASE-5819 SplitLogs function could leak resources [stack] HBASE-5811 TestLoadAndSwitchEncodeOnDisk fails sometimes [stack] HBASE-581

RE: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for download

Thanks Lars. Will give it a go in next few days and get back on it. Regards Ram > -Original Message- > From: lars hofhansl [mailto:lhofha...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:51 AM > To: hbase-dev > Subject: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for > dow

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-0.94 #132

See -- [...truncated 588 lines...] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 42.086 sec Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestFSErrorsExposed Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors:

Jenkins build is back to normal : HBase-0.92 #377

See

Re: RegionObservers notifications on error

There is no reason per se other than the limited use cases of the initial implementation and the principle of doing as little as necessary to meet them while (hopefully) not limiting extension to handle additional use cases over time. Those use cases fall into two categories IMHO:   - Authorit

Re: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96

So, in case it's not clear, Deveraj's work doesn't involve ZK. Secure RPC doesn't care about ZK version.You might care about securing ZK with SASL auth if you are also running secure Hadoop (and HBase) -- I would -- but that would be up to you. Best regards,     - Andy Problems worthy of a

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-0.94 #131

See Changes: [tedyu] HBASE-5787 Table owner can't disable/delete its own table (Matteo) -- [...truncated 551 lines...] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 212.685 sec Runnin

Re: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96

> Only at runtime if you run secure hbase. > St.Ack Correct. Additionally there are two levels of HBase security, if you will: 1) RPC security: secure RPC engine, Kerberos authentication via SASL, optional wire encryption via SASL 2) Coprocessor based access control at the HBase column famil

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK #2785

See Changes: [stack] HBASE-5791 Apache project branding requirements: DOAP file [PATCH] -- [...truncated 8101 lines...] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 20.378 sec Runn

Re: Please refrain from 0.94 checkins.

RC2 tagged. 0.94 is open again. - Original Message - From: lars hofhansl To: hbase-dev Cc: Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 1:58 PM Subject: Please refrain from 0.94 checkins. Cutting RC2. Stay tuned.

ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for download

The third 0.94.0 RC is available for download here: http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc2/ I signed the tarballs. My gpg key (signed by stack) is available from pgp.mit.edu. Key id: 7CA45750 HBase 0.94 is a performance release with a few new features as well. It is wire compatible wi

Re: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > I want to mention the work Devaraj D is doing in HBASE-5732: merging the > secure RPC engine. > > I think the implication of that work is zookeeper 3.4.x would be required > for 0.96 > Only at runtime if you run secure hbase. St.Ack

Re: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96

--- Jesse Yates 240-888-2200 @jesse_yates jyates.github.com On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jesse Yates > wrote: > > Its makes dealing with a lot of the zk operations easier to reason about. > > Consider the 'create with pa

Re: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96

I want to mention the work Devaraj D is doing in HBASE-5732: merging the secure RPC engine. I think the implication of that work is zookeeper 3.4.x would be required for 0.96 Cheers On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Jesse Yates wrote: > Hi all, > > I was working on some patches to make ZK a bit

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK #2784

See Changes: [stack] HBASE-5819 SplitLogs function could leak resources [stack] HBASE-5811 TestLoadAndSwitchEncodeOnDisk fails sometimes [stack] HBASE-5817 Fix uncategorized tests [stack] HBASE-5825 TestHLog not running any tests; fix -

Re: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jesse Yates wrote: > Its makes dealing with a lot of the zk operations easier to reason about. > Consider the 'create with parents' or the 'delete recursively' use cases - > non-transactional guarantees means we have a lot of extra logic for > checking under parent

Re: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96

Its makes dealing with a lot of the zk operations easier to reason about. Consider the 'create with parents' or the 'delete recursively' use cases - non-transactional guarantees means we have a lot of extra logic for checking under parents on creation, synchronous operations requiring extra checkin

Jenkins build is back to normal : HBase-0.94 #130

See

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-0.94 #129

See Changes: [larsh] CHANGES.txt for 0.94.0rc2 [larsh] HBASE-5545 region can't be opened for a long time. Because the creating File failed. (Ram) [larsh] HBASE-5782 Edits can be appended out of seqid order since HBASE-4487 [larsh] HBASE-5

Re: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96

ZK 3.4.x still isn't marked "stable", so I'm a little hesitant to move to requiring it just yet. What tangible benefit do we gain from the "transactional" methods? -Todd On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:48 PM, lars hofhansl wrote: > +1 > > > > - Original Message - > From: Jesse Yates > To: de

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK #2783

See Changes: [larsh] HBASE-5545 region can't be opened for a long time. Because the creating File failed. (Ram) [larsh] HBASE-5782 Edits can be appended out of seqid order since HBASE-4487 [stack] HBASE-3585 isLegalFamilyName() can throw

RegionObservers notifications on error

Is there a reason that RegionObservers are not notified when a get/put/delete fails? Suppose I maintain some (transient) state in my Coprocessor that is created during preGet and discarded during postGet. If the get fails, postGet is not invoked, so I cannot remove the state. If there is a goo

Please refrain from 0.94 checkins.

Cutting RC2. Stay tuned.

Re: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96

+1 - Original Message - From: Jesse Yates To: dev@hbase.apache.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 1:33 PM Subject: requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96 Hi all, I was working on some patches to make ZK a bit more sane using the transaction operations recently added (in jira: https:/

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-0.94 #128

See Changes: [stack] HBASE-5823 Hbck should be able to print help -- [...truncated 546 lines...] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.TestHFilePerformance Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skip

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK #2782

See Changes: [stack] HBASE-5823 Hbck should be able to print help -- [...truncated 8054 lines...] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestShell Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Ti

requiring zookeeper 3.4.x in 0.96

Hi all, I was working on some patches to make ZK a bit more sane using the transaction operations recently added (in jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-965 and in the api here: htt

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-0.92 #376

See -- Started by an SCM change Building remotely on ubuntu5 in workspace hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed:

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK #2781

See Changes: [stack] HBASE-5810 HBASE-5620 Convert the client protocol of HRegionInterface to PB addendum [tedyu] HBASE-5787 Table owner can't disable/delete its own table (Matteo) -- [...truncated

Re: large tests are not executed on apache builds

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:37 AM, N Keywal wrote: > Hi Stack, > > It seems to be ok now (it was not on the built > https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/2774/consoleText). > > BTW, I've been able to improve locally the built time with a 2G ram disk > and 10 processes. We're under 20 minutes wi

Jenkins build is back to normal : HBase-0.94-security #14

See

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-0.94 #127

See -- [...truncated 549 lines...] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestMaster Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 15.234 sec Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestDrainingServer

Re: generate protocolbuffers sources reformatting change (trunk)

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Ferdy Galema wrote: > Hi, > > While working on an issue that requires a minor change (FYI: HBase-2214) to > the protocolbuffers definition file, I noticed that regenerating the > sources changes the formatting. I used the instructions in the README.txt > file, noth

generate protocolbuffers sources reformatting change (trunk)

Hi, While working on an issue that requires a minor change (FYI: HBase-2214) to the protocolbuffers definition file, I noticed that regenerating the sources changes the formatting. I used the instructions in the README.txt file, nothing more or less. Am I missing something? Or are the current gene

Re: large tests are not executed on apache builds

Hi Stack, It seems to be ok now (it was not on the built https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/2774/consoleText). BTW, I've been able to improve locally the built time with a 2G ram disk and 10 processes. We're under 20 minutes with a one proc desktop machine (intel i7). So we still have some