Re: Removing HRegionInterface in 0.96, HBASE-5889

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Stack wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jimmy Xiang wrote: >> To those non-bundled (third-party) HBase client(s) using HRegionInterface >> directly, such as >> asynchbase, should 0.96 be a singularity too? >> > > I've already talked w/ Benoît and he is goo

Jenkins build is back to normal : HBase-0.92 #397

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : HBase-0.94 #177

See

Build failed in Jenkins: hbase-0.90 #490

See Changes: [stack] HBASE-5911 hbck need an option -help to printout usage [stack] HBASE-5911 hbck need an option -help to printout usage -- [...truncated 1219 lines...] Running org.apache.hadoop.hba

Re: 0.92.2?

Shall we open a jira for investigating the performance issue, and mark it as a blocker for 0.92.2? Enis On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Elliott Clark wrote: > I'm going to try and test 0.94.0 RC3 a little today. After that I can try > and do some poking to see why 92 was so slow. > > On Thu, M

Re: Removing HRegionInterface in 0.96, HBASE-5889

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jimmy Xiang wrote: > To those non-bundled (third-party) HBase client(s) using HRegionInterface > directly, such as > asynchbase, should 0.96 be a singularity too? > I've already talked w/ Benoît and he is good w/ move to pb; he (we) will make it able to ride over

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-0.92 #396

I found this hanging test - TestMetaReaderEditor: Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditor Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.catalog.TestMetaReaderEditorNoCluster Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 4.07 sec It has been flaky for a long time. FYI

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-0.92 #396

See Changes: [tedyu] HBASE-5883 Backup master is going down due to connection refused exception (Jieshan) -- [...truncated 1772 lines...] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapse

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-0.94 #176

See -- [...truncated 578 lines...] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.898 sec Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.replication.regionserver.TestReplicationSink Tests run: 5, Failures:

Removing HRegionInterface in 0.96, HBASE-5889

In 0.96, we are going to move to PB. But HRegionInterface is still there in case someone needs it. That means we need to maintain both implementations. It also prevents us moving to PB internally. I filed HBASE-5889 to address it. In reviewing the patch, Ted brought a good point. To those non-

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-0.94 #175

See Changes: [tedyu] HBASE-5883 Backup master is going down due to connection refused exception (Jieshan) -- [...truncated 572 lines...] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:

Re: 0.92.2?

I'm going to try and test 0.94.0 RC3 a little today. After that I can try and do some poking to see why 92 was so slow. On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Anyone looked into the apparent performance issue that Elliott reported > earlier this week? If we have a big perf regres

Jenkins build is back to normal : HBase-TRUNK #2843

See

Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for download

I agree it was just a micro benchmark with no guarantee that it relates to real world. With it just being standalone I didn't think anyone should take the numbers as 100% representative. Really I was just trying to shake out any weird behaviors and the fact that we got a big speed up was interesti

Re: 0.92.2?

Anyone looked into the apparent performance issue that Elliott reported earlier this week? If we have a big perf regression from 0.90 we should probably spend at least a few minutes looking into it. -Todd On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Stack wrote: > Should I put up a 0.92.2 candidate? There

Re: 0.92.2?

+1 On May 3, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Stack wrote: > Should I put up a 0.92.2 candidate? There have been a bunch of fixes > since 0.92.1: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12319888 > > St.Ack

0.92.2?

Should I put up a 0.92.2 candidate? There have been a bunch of fixes since 0.92.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12319888 St.Ack

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK #2842

See Changes: [stack] HBASE-5444 Add PB-based calls to HMasterRegionInterface -- [...truncated 8268 lines...] Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1, Time elapsed: 5.174 sec Running org.apac

Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available for download

Hi guys Looking at the posted slide/pictures for the benchmark the following intriguing me: 1. The recordcount is only 100,000 2. workoloada is: read 50%, update 50% and zipfian distribution even with 5M operations count, the same keys are updated again and again. 3. heap size 10G Therefore it mig

Jenkins build is back to normal : HBase-0.94 #174

See