Re: Thoughts about large feature dev branches

Hello, Shall we move forward with this proposal? Let's get this in place soon so larger projects such as snapshots can make use of this. - Dave On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote: > This has been brought up in the past but we are here again. > > We have a few large features

Re: Is PerformanceEvaluation missing in HBase trunk...

Hmmm, that's odd that it stopped working. If no ones on it, I'll try to take a whack at it in the morning. --- Jesse Yates @jesse_yates jyates.github.com On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Stack wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Elliott Clark > wrote: > > None of the ut

Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for download

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Stack wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Ted Yu wrote: >> With 3 +1's and no -1, 0.92.2 RC1 passes. >> I am +1 on releasing this tgz as 0.92.2. I verified the md5 and the signature. Layout when I untar looks good (doc, api). Started it standalone. UI l

Re: Is PerformanceEvaluation missing in HBase trunk...

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Elliott Clark wrote: > None of the utilities packaged in the test jars are currently being > packaged when running assembly:assembly > > I filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6178 > > a little while ago. I can try and take a look in a little bit. B

Re: Is PerformanceEvaluation missing in HBase trunk...

None of the utilities packaged in the test jars are currently being packaged when running assembly:assembly I filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6178 a little while ago. I can try and take a look in a little bit. But if anyone knows the maven-foo needed, I wouldn't say no. On Tu

Is PerformanceEvaluation missing in HBase trunk...

... or am I missing something? hbase-tests.jar is not to be found, and PerformanceEvaluation is not found in any of the jars included. Did that change, or did the modularization and the accompanying builld change accidentally remove PerformanceEvaluation? -- Lars

Jenkins build is back to normal : HBase-0.94 #463

See

RE: mttr update

Thanks for the nice update N. Regards Ram > -Original Message- > From: n keywal [mailto:nkey...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 12:27 AM > To: dev@hbase.apache.org > Subject: mttr update > > Hi All, > > There is some progress on MTTR. It's detailed in HBASE-5843, but he

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-TRUNK #3321

See Changes: [larsh] HBASE-6757 Very inefficient behaviour of scan using FilterList -- [...truncated 2686 lines...] Tests run: 15, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 47.015 sec Running

Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for download

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > With 3 +1's and no -1, 0.92.2 RC1 passes. > Usually it takes 3 +1s by committers. Maybe hang a little while to get another one or so? St.Ack

Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for download

With 3 +1's and no -1, 0.92.2 RC1 passes. I will announce 0.92.2 release tomorrow. On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Aditya wrote: > I tested 0.92.2 this weekend under heavy workload and induced master/region > server fail-over. No issues were observed. > > Kind regards, > Aditya Kishore > > On

Build failed in Jenkins: HBase-0.94 #462

See -- [...truncated 588 lines...] Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 67.832 sec Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestEndToEndSplitTransaction Tests run: 2, Failures: 0,

Jenkins build is back to normal : HBase-0.94 #461

See

Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for download

Aditya / Shrijeet: Thanks for the update. Appreciate it. On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Aditya wrote: > I tested 0.92.2 this weekend under heavy workload and induced master/region > server fail-over. No issues were observed. > > Kind regards, > Aditya Kishore > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:

mttr update

Hi All, There is some progress on MTTR. It's detailed in HBASE-5843, but here is a synthesis. That's the server side view, including the edits split & replaying, and considering a timeout of 30s in ZK. 1) Region Server crash. We can expect 50s on 0.94; 20s on 0.96: - the failure will be detected

Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for download

I tested 0.92.2 this weekend under heavy workload and induced master/region server fail-over. No issues were observed. Kind regards, Aditya Kishore On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Shrijeet Paliwal wrote: > 0.92.2 has been running for a couple of weeks on all of our production > data centers. N

Re: ANN: The second hbase 0.92.2 release candidate is available for download

0.92.2 has been running for a couple of weeks on all of our production data centers. No issues yet. -Shrijeet On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > A gentle reminder that Sept. 12th is approaching. > > I am +1 on this RC: I have done some basic checking in a dev cluster and > everythi

Strata/Hadoop World HBase Meetup on October 25th

Hi, I don't think this was mentioned on the ML yet, but for those coming to Strata in New York next month, there is a Strata/Hadoop World HBase Meetup on October 25th, organized by Jon Hsieh & friends and hosted by AppNexus: http://www.meetup.com/HBase-NYC/events/81728932/ See you in NYC! Oti

Re: Hbase Assignments in trunk.

region assignment in ZK could be interesting. + having the regionserver state available. This would require some work in ZK I fear (ZOOKEEPER-1147). However, persisting data in ZK is dangerous: this leads to have the cluster state shared in two references, making the whole thing complicated to man