See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/4010/changes
Changes:
[larsh] HBASE-8188 Avoid unnecessary row compare in StoreScanner
[stack] Some more doc on snappy setup
[stack] HBASE-8231 delete tests in table_tests.rb(TestShell) always running on
empty table
[stack] HBASE-8230 Possible
Hi All
During some random testing i faced this issue in Trunk version.
Master and RS are on the same node and i have only one node.
I created some tables, disabled and dropped it.
The META was intact.
Again when i tried to create the table, the Meta could not be contacted
though in the same
See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95/122/changes
Changes:
[stack] HBASE-5525 Truncate and preserve region boundaries option
[larsh] HBASE-8188 Avoid unnecessary row compare in StoreScanner
[stack] HBASE-8231 delete tests in table_tests.rb(TestShell) always running on
empty table
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan created HBASE-8266:
-
Summary: Master cannot start if TableNotFoundException is thrown
while partial table recovery
Key: HBASE-8266
URL:
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/939/changes
Changes:
[larsh] HBASE-7599 Port HBASE-6066 (low hanging read path improvements) to
0.94 - retry (Devaraj Das)
[stack] HBASE-8231 delete tests in table_tests.rb(TestShell) always running on
empty table
[larsh] HBASE-8188 Avoid
Nicolas Liochon created HBASE-8267:
--
Summary: Add some resources checker for tests
Key: HBASE-8267
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8267
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/4012/changes
Changes:
[mbertozzi] HBASE-7615 Add metrics for snapshots
[mbertozzi] HBASE-7415 Add task information to snapshot operation (Jesse Yates)
[mbertozzi] HBASE-5525 Truncate and preserve region boundaries option, addendum
See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95/123/changes
Changes:
[mbertozzi] HBASE-7615 Add metrics for snapshots
[mbertozzi] HBASE-7415 Add task information to snapshot operation (Jesse Yates)
[mbertozzi] HBASE-5525 Truncate and preserve region boundaries option, addendum
See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95-on-hadoop2/54/changes
Changes:
[mbertozzi] HBASE-7615 Add metrics for snapshots
[mbertozzi] HBASE-7415 Add task information to snapshot operation (Jesse Yates)
[mbertozzi] HBASE-5525 Truncate and preserve region boundaries option, addendum
[stack]
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0/476/changes
Changes:
[mbertozzi] HBASE-7615 Add metrics for snapshots
[mbertozzi] HBASE-7415 Add task information to snapshot operation (Jesse Yates)
[mbertozzi] HBASE-5525 Truncate and preserve region boundaries option, addendum
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/940/changes
Changes:
[mbertozzi] HBASE-8259 Snapshot backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling restarts
--
[...truncated 5922 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestMultiTableInputFormat
Tests run: 5,
I ran the performances tests against 0.95.0RC1.
While filteredScan, read and writes got nice improvements (18% faster
for the reads), scans seems to be negatively impacted (32% slower for
scanRange100).
Results are there:
http://www.spaggiari.org/media/blogs/hbase/pdf/performances_20130404.pdf
Hey all,
I just wanted to make sure we are on the same page here when we committing
code and that we are consistent when marking fix version in the jira. Its
pretty important that we get this right because our release notes are
generated from these as of 0.94.
Here's what I'm doing and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Yu reopened HBASE-8231:
---
delete tests in table_tests.rb(TestShell) always running on empty table.
One thing I don't understand is why there is noticeable difference in
performance between 0.95.0 and trunk.
I think their code should be very close to each other.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari jean-m...@spaggiari.org
wrote:
I ran the performances tests against 0.95.0RC1.
It sounds like all the RS handlers were full and we're missing that
thread dump. Next time please jstack everything, alright? ;)
J-D
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:31 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan
ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
During some random testing i faced this issue in Trunk
Thank Jon,
I do not think we have to include anticipated future branches in the tags.
The release notes are not accumulative but list changes made for each release.
So if something is in 0.95.x a 0.96 tag neither needed nor wanted (IMHO) until
we actually have a *parallel* 0.96 branch.
That is
The argument for excluding the 0.96 tag makes sense. Can we agree to do
this:
Commit only to trunk: Mark with 0.98
Commit to 0.95 and trunk : Mark with 0.98, and 0.95.x
Commit to 0.94.x and 0.95, and trunk: Mark with 0.98, 0.95.x, and 0.94.x
Commit to 89-fb: Mark with 89-fb.
Commit site fixes:
Ok.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
The argument for excluding the 0.96 tag makes sense. Can we agree to do
this:
Commit only to trunk: Mark with 0.98
Commit to 0.95 and trunk : Mark with 0.98, and 0.95.x
Commit to 0.94.x and 0.95, and trunk: Mark
Our Amit has been around with a good while now doing important, deep stuff
in thorny areas. Please join me welcoming him as one of the hbase
committer team.
St.Ack
Congratulations, Amit.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Our Amit has been around with a good while now doing important, deep stuff
in thorny areas. Please join me welcoming him as one of the hbase
committer team.
St.Ack
Congratulations Amit.
- Dave
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Our Amit has been around with a good while now doing important, deep stuff
in thorny areas. Please join me welcoming him as one of the hbase
committer team.
St.Ack
We might wanna bring this discussion here on dev@.
So right now the questions are:
- Should we call a release with just HBASE-8259 as 0.94.6.1 or
0.94.7? How much testing are we expecting from folks?
- Should we just cut a release with what's in the branch and call it 0.94.7?
My opinion is to
Congratulation Amit!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Our Amit has been around with a good while now doing important, deep stuff
in thorny areas. Please join me welcoming him as one of the hbase
committer team.
St.Ack
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/4013/changes
Third 0.94.6 RC was cut on Mar. 14th.
It has been almost 3 weeks since them. Meaning we have sizable goodies for
the next release.
I would vote for 0.94.7 release which would come in April anyway.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
We might wanna
Looks like it. Please open a jira?
Thx,
J-D
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal
shrij...@rocketfuel.com wrote:
Hi,
HBASE-4894 removed sbin from tarball for 0.92 release. I think the 'mess'
Stack referred to in jira hasn't been taken care of in 0.94.
So shouldn't we have
If we do a 0.94.6.1 we should call it that (IMHO), replacing releases with the
same name is confusing, also we only have to validate that one patch and not go
through the whole process.
+1 on 0.94.6.1 and we agree to do that with just running the test suite and
double checking that one patch
Congrats!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
jean-m...@spaggiari.org wrote:
Congratulation Amit!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Our Amit has been around with a good while now doing important, deep
stuff
in thorny areas. Please join
+1 on both 0.94.6.1 with short tests (since only 1 patch is added),
but I don't have anything against starting 0.94.7RC too.
2013/4/4 lars hofhansl la...@apache.org:
If we do a 0.94.6.1 we should call it that (IMHO), replacing releases with
the same name is confusing, also we only have to
Congratulations!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Sergey Shelukhin ser...@hortonworks.comwrote:
Congrats!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
jean-m...@spaggiari.org wrote:
Congratulation Amit!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Our
My problem with delaying getting this patch out there is that people
who adopt 0.94.6 are putting themselves in a hole because you also
can't roll restart out of it.
J-D
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Third 0.94.6 RC was cut on Mar. 14th.
It has been almost
Welcome, Amit!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Jimmy Xiang jxi...@cloudera.com wrote:
Congratulations!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Sergey Shelukhin ser...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
Congrats!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
jean-m...@spaggiari.org wrote:
Shrijeet Paliwal created HBASE-8268:
---
Summary: Do no include sbin directory in tarball
Key: HBASE-8268
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8268
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Opened HBASE-8268 . Patch is same as HBASE-4894 so did not attach.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
Looks like it. Please open a jira?
Thx,
J-D
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Shrijeet Paliwal
shrij...@rocketfuel.com wrote:
Hi,
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/941/changes
Changes:
[stack] HBASE-8231 delete tests in table_tests.rb(TestShell) always running on
empty table; REVERT
--
[...truncated 5946 lines...]
Running
Congrats and welcome!
- Jesse Yates
On Apr 4, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Nicolas Liochon nkey...@gmail.com wrote:
Welcome, Amit!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Jimmy Xiang jxi...@cloudera.com wrote:
Congratulations!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Sergey Shelukhin ser...@hortonworks.com
+1 on 0.94.7 rather than 0.94.6.1.
Chatting w/ JD and Aleks, we should pull 0.94.6. I can add note up on
webpage to explain the hole.
Can I help w/ the 0.94.7 rolling?
St.Ack
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
My problem with delaying getting this
Pulling 0.94.6 is another option.
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
To: HBase Dev List dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: 0.94.6.1 discussion (WAS [jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8259) Snapshot
backport in 0.94.6 breaks rolling
My vote is release 0.94.6.1 with just this one fix _and_ pull 0.94.6(.0)
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:12 AM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
Pulling 0.94.6 is another option.
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
To: HBase Dev List dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent:
welcome!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jesse Yates jesse.k.ya...@gmail.comwrote:
Congrats and welcome!
- Jesse Yates
On Apr 4, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Nicolas Liochon nkey...@gmail.com wrote:
Welcome, Amit!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Jimmy Xiang jxi...@cloudera.com wrote:
That said, doing a release (even a point release) is some work. I typically go
through every single outstanding issue and decide whether to get that in or
push it, teasing out related issues, etc.
In this case I would wholesale move all 0.94.7 to 0.94.8 and declare 0.94.7
done.
-- Lars
And FYI, I did make a 0.94.6.1 branch. Applied the change, updated CHANGES.txt
and pom.xml, and am running the test suite now.
As soon as that is done we can release it and simultaneously pull 0.94.6.
The 0.94.6.1 branch is under tags, in case you wanted to have a look.
-- Lars
Congrats and welcome. !!!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
welcome!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jesse Yates jesse.k.ya...@gmail.com
wrote:
Congrats and welcome!
- Jesse Yates
On Apr 4, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Nicolas Liochon
Congratulations!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan
ramkrishna.s.vasude...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats and welcome. !!!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com wrote:
welcome!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jesse Yates
Jean-Marc Spaggiari created HBASE-8269:
--
Summary: Fix data locallity documentation.
Key: HBASE-8269
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8269
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:19 AM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
And FYI, I did make a 0.94.6.1 branch. Applied the change, updated
CHANGES.txt and pom.xml, and am running the test suite now.
As soon as that is done we can release it and simultaneously pull 0.94.6.
The 0.94.6.1 branch
Just did that so we can fire quickly. We should all agree (or at least not
disagree) that this is right (least confusing) path.
-- Lars
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
To: HBase Dev List dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl la...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April
+1 to replacing 0.94.6 with 0.94.6.1
Jon.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:40 AM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
Just did that so we can fire quickly. We should all agree (or at least not
disagree) that this is right (least confusing) path.
-- Lars
I was just marking issues in 0.95 and trunk w/ 0.95. Let me go back and
fix so has 0.98 on it too. Let me also remove 0.96 for now. We can bring
it back later (or just skip it and go to 1.0?).
St.Ack
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:33 AM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
Yes, I think we
By this logic, 0.98 tag should be renamed to 0.97, yes?
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:33 AM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
Yes, I think we should remove the 0.96 tag. Stack said the other day that
he should have just renamed 0.96 to 0.95 rather than moving all the issues.
The rest is
The 0.94.6.1 tarball is here:
http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6.1/
Building the -security tarball now.
-- Lars
From: Jonathan Hsieh j...@cloudera.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl la...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:41 AM
Not necessarily. 0.95 is special in that it is a known experimental version
to play with.
From: Nick Dimiduk ndimi...@gmail.com
To: dev@hbase.apache.org; lars hofhansl la...@apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: Marking fix version
+1
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:40 AM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
Just did that so we can fire quickly. We should all agree (or at least not
disagree) that this is right (least confusing) path.
-- Lars
From: Stack st...@duboce.net
To: HBase
+1
Wouldn't offset be a family:qualifier instead of a String?
Please consider adding two interfaces: a version which exposes the state
externally (as you've described) and another that encapsulates the state
handling on the user's behalf. The former is useful for exposing over
stateless
+1
---
Jesse Yates
@jesse_yates
jyates.github.com
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:40 AM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
Just did that so we can fire quickly. We should all agree (or at least
Deployed 0.94.6.1 on 8 servers. Stopped/started (not rolling).
All regions got re-assigned correctly. Did some truncate/MRs(in
progress)/balancing/shell, everything working fine.
+1
2013/4/4 Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org:
+1
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:40 AM, lars hofhansl
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/942/
Uploaded here:
http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.6.1/
Please have a quick look and vote +1/-1 today.
Only changes are HBASE-8259, CHANGES.txt (to include that jira), and pom.xml
(naming the release 0.94.6.1).
Thanks.
-- Lars
+1
Checked signature and md4. Looked at doc. Started it up. Looked at UI.
Uploaded a few million. Read it and confirmed it there. No exceptions in
log.
St.Ack
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:33 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
Uploaded here:
tl;dr should two compatible versions be considered both wire and
binary compatible or just the former?
Hey devs,
0.92 is compatible with 0.94, meaning that you can run a client for
either against the other and you can roll restart from 0.92 to 0.94.
What about binary compatibility? Meaning, can
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/4014/changes
Changes:
[tedyu] HBASE-8240 CompoundConfiguration should implement Iterable (Ted Yu)
--
[...truncated 3687 lines...]
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 33.684 sec
Fixed subject. (Maybe you can have a loop, but I'd be fine if you just had a
look.)
+1 from me. All tests pass. I installed it, loaded some data, ran my
in-block-cache perf test, checked the version numbers, etc.
-- Lars
From: lars hofhansl
See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95/124/changes
Changes:
[tedyu] HBASE-8240 CompoundConfiguration should implement Iterable (Ted Yu)
--
[...truncated 3684 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.procedure.TestZKProcedureControllers
Tests run:
Devaraj Das created HBASE-8270:
--
Summary: Backport HBASE-8097 to 0.94
Key: HBASE-8270
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8270
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter:
Jesse Yates created HBASE-8271:
--
Summary: Book updates for changes to GC options in shell scripts
Key: HBASE-8271
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8271
Project: HBase
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-8231.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.94.7
0.98.0
Committed to 0.94.7
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94-security/130/changes
Changes:
[tedyu] HBASE-8127 Region of a disabling or disabled table could be stuck in
transition state when RS dies during Master initialization (Rajeshbabu)
[stack] HBASE-8231 delete tests in table_tests.rb(TestShell) always
+1 from the Phoenix team. We installed and tested on our internal
cluster and everything looks good.
James
On 04/04/2013 01:33 PM, lars hofhansl wrote:
Fixed subject. (Maybe you can have a loop, but I'd be fine if you just had a
look.)
+1 from me. All tests pass. I installed it, loaded
+1 from me. MR is still running, not facing any unusual issue. Since
0.94.6 was also tested a lot, sound like it will be a go for 0.94.6.1
too...
2013/4/4 James Taylor jtay...@salesforce.com:
+1 from the Phoenix team. We installed and tested on our internal cluster
and everything looks good.
+1
I tested a 0.94.6.1 master with a 0.94.2 region server and now it works :)
J-D
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:35 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
I think we're good. Any objection if I released this as 0.94.6.1 and
remove 0.94.6 once propagated?
-- Lars
Sergey Shelukhin created HBASE-8272:
---
Summary: make compaction checker frequency configurable per
table/cf
Key: HBASE-8272
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8272
Project: HBase
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
tl;dr should two compatible versions be considered both wire and
binary compatible or just the former?
I agree; if the compatibility is not explicitly quantified, it implies both.
-n
Compatible implies both to my understanding of the term, unless
qualified.
I don't think we should qualify it. This looks like a regression to me.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
tl;dr should two compatible versions be considered both wire and
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/4015/changes
Changes:
[jyates] HBASE-7817: Suggested JDWP debug options in hbase-env.sh are wrong
(Vasu Mariyala)
--
[...truncated 3727 lines...]
Tests run: 63, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
+1, tarballs look good, checksums match, started up local clusters with
both the base and security builds and ran LoadTestTool, didn't see anything
amiss in the logs.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans jdcry...@apache.orgwrote:
+1
I tested a 0.94.6.1 master with a 0.94.2
+1 checked tarball layouts and signatures. Launched in tree and tested with
1M inserts via LoadTestTool, nothing unexpected found in logs.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
+1
Checked signature and md4. Looked at doc. Started it up. Looked at UI.
Uploaded a
I agree we need both, but I'm afraid that ship has sailed.
It's not something we paid a lot of attention to especially being
forward-binary-compatible. I would guess that there will be many more of these
issues.
Also, we have to qualify this statement somewhere. If you extend HRegionServer
you
Yes it's already too late for 0.94.
Stack is fixing the Ref Guide about 0.92 and 0.94 being interface
compatible: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade0.94
We could add a new column in the release testing matrix to add versions
that we binary-tested, at least for the user-facing methods.
See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95/125/changes
Changes:
[jyates] HBASE-7817: Suggested JDWP debug options in hbase-env.sh are wrong
(Vasu Mariyala)
--
[...truncated 3688 lines...]
Running
Ted Yu created HBASE-8273:
-
Summary: HColumnDescriptor setters should return void
Key: HBASE-8273
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8273
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Sergey Shelukhin created HBASE-8274:
---
Summary: Backport to 94: HBASE-7488 Implement
HConnectionManager.locateRegions which is currently returning null
Key: HBASE-8274
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-8211.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Committed. Thanks for the patch Himanshu.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack resolved HBASE-8273.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Resolving as invalid. Ill-specified issue. How do I know when this issue is
done? We
Jean-Daniel Cryans created HBASE-8275:
-
Summary: Tool to test binary compatibility
Key: HBASE-8275
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8275
Project: HBase
Issue Type: New
Thanks everybody.
As soon as the changes have propagated to the primary download sites I'll make
an official announcement.
-- Lars
From: Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
To: dev@hbase.apache.org dev@hbase.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 3:37 PM
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94-security/131/changes
The binary compat is a slippery slope. It'd be a bummer if we couldn't
take advantage of all the innovation you guys are doing. At the same
time, it's tough to require the Phoenix user community, for example, to
upgrade their HBase servers to be able to move to the latest version of
Phoenix. I
The HBase Team just released HBase 0.94.6.1.
This release only contains a single fix for an issue with rolling restarts to
0.94.6 from older releases.
See HBASE-8259 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8259) for more
details.
HBase 0.94.6.1 is the current stable release of HBase.
See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95-on-hadoop2/55/changes
Changes:
[larsh] HBASE-8169 TestMasterFailover#testMasterFailoverWithMockedRITOnDeadRS
may fail due to regions randomly assigned to a RS (Jeffrey Zhong)
[jyates] HBASE-7817: Suggested JDWP debug options in hbase-env.sh are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Hofhansl resolved HBASE-7599.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Marking resolved (again)
Port
See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0/477/changes
Changes:
[larsh] HBASE-8169 TestMasterFailover#testMasterFailoverWithMockedRITOnDeadRS
may fail due to regions randomly assigned to a RS (Jeffrey Zhong)
[jyates] HBASE-7817: Suggested JDWP debug options in hbase-env.sh
Jeffrey Zhong created HBASE-8276:
Summary: Backport hbase-6738 to 0.94 Too aggressive task
resubmission from the distributed log manager
Key: HBASE-8276
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8276
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Dmitriy Ryaboy dvrya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hiya Nick,
Pig converts data for HBase storage using this class:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/backend/hadoop/hbase/HBaseBinaryConverter.java(which
is mostly just calling into HBase's
Thanks for taking the time for the thoughtful feedback James.
- between 0.94.3 and 0.94.4, new methods were introduced on
RegionScanner. Often coprocessors will have their own implementation of
these so that they can aggregate in the postScannerOpen. Though this broke
binary compat, it improved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Hofhansl reopened HBASE-8273:
--
Let's give Ted's idea a try.
HColumnDescriptor setters should return void
Aleksandr Shulman created HBASE-8277:
Summary: [API Compatibility]: Create tool to analyze changes in
the HBase public API
Key: HBASE-8277
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8277
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell resolved HBASE-8277.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.94.7)
Dup of HBASE-8275
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aleksandr Shulman reopened HBASE-8277:
--
This is a different tool than the one to which this was dup'd.
Specifically, I had in
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:33 PM, James Taylor jtay...@salesforce.comwrote:
Maybe if we can keep nullability separate from the
serialization/deserialization, we can come up with a solution that works?
I think implied null could work, but let's build out the matrix. I see two
kinds of types:
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
