[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11477) book.xml has Docbook validity issues (again)

2014-07-07 Thread Misty Stanley-Jones (JIRA)
Misty Stanley-Jones created HBASE-11477: --- Summary: book.xml has Docbook validity issues (again) Key: HBASE-11477 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11477 Project: HBase Is

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11476) Expand 'Conceptual View' section of Data Model chapter

2014-07-07 Thread Misty Stanley-Jones (JIRA)
Misty Stanley-Jones created HBASE-11476: --- Summary: Expand 'Conceptual View' section of Data Model chapter Key: HBASE-11476 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11476 Project: HBase

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-11473) Add BaseWALObserver class

2014-07-07 Thread Enis Soztutar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Enis Soztutar resolved HBASE-11473. --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Committed this to 0.98+. Thanks Andrew for re

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-11293) Master and Region servers fail to start when hbase.master.ipc.address=0.0.0.0, hbase.regionserver.ipc.address=0.0.0.0 and Kerberos is enabled

2014-07-07 Thread Devaraj Das (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devaraj Das reopened HBASE-11293: - [~miharp], this is not done yet. Trunk needs to have a patch. > Master and Region servers fail to s

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11475) Distributed log replay should also replay compaction events

2014-07-07 Thread Enis Soztutar (JIRA)
Enis Soztutar created HBASE-11475: - Summary: Distributed log replay should also replay compaction events Key: HBASE-11475 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11475 Project: HBase

Jenkins Build Slaves

2014-07-07 Thread Giridharan Kesavan
All Yahoo is in the process of retiring all the hadoop jenkins build slaves, *hadoop[1-9]* and replace them with a newer set of beefier hosts. These new machines are configured with *ubuntu-14.04*. Over the next couple of days I will be configuring the build jobs to run on these newly configured

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11474) [Thrift2] support authentication/impersonation

2014-07-07 Thread Jimmy Xiang (JIRA)
Jimmy Xiang created HBASE-11474: --- Summary: [Thrift2] support authentication/impersonation Key: HBASE-11474 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11474 Project: HBase Issue Type: Impr

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

2014-07-07 Thread Jonathan Hsieh
I agree. These are fine things we could get in 1.1 or 1.2 release if they don't break compat and otherwise a 2.0 release timeframe. Jon. On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > I think it is fair to say for both C API and transaction API that it should > be ok to include them

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11473) Add BaseWALObserver class

2014-07-07 Thread Enis Soztutar (JIRA)
Enis Soztutar created HBASE-11473: - Summary: Add BaseWALObserver class Key: HBASE-11473 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11473 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11472) Remove ZKTableStateClientSideReader class

2014-07-07 Thread Mikhail Antonov (JIRA)
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-11472: --- Summary: Remove ZKTableStateClientSideReader class Key: HBASE-11472 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11472 Project: HBase Issue Type: S

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11471) Move TableStateManager and ZkTableStateManager to hbase-server

2014-07-07 Thread Mikhail Antonov (JIRA)
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-11471: --- Summary: Move TableStateManager and ZkTableStateManager to hbase-server Key: HBASE-11471 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11471 Project: HBase

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

2014-07-07 Thread Ted Yu
We're on the same page, Enis. Cheers On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > I think it is fair to say for both C API and transaction API that it should > be ok to include them if they are ready before the time to cut the 1.0 RC. > If not, I do not want to hold the release wait

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11470) Move Server interface to hbase-server

2014-07-07 Thread Mikhail Antonov (JIRA)
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-11470: --- Summary: Move Server interface to hbase-server Key: HBASE-11470 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11470 Project: HBase Issue Type: Sub-t

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11469) MetaTableLocator should be moved to hbase-server

2014-07-07 Thread Mikhail Antonov (JIRA)
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-11469: --- Summary: MetaTableLocator should be moved to hbase-server Key: HBASE-11469 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11469 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11468) MasterAddressTracker needs to be moved to hbase-server

2014-07-07 Thread Mikhail Antonov (JIRA)
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-11468: --- Summary: MasterAddressTracker needs to be moved to hbase-server Key: HBASE-11468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11468 Project: HBase

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11467) New impl of Registry interface not using ZK + new RPCs on master protocol.

2014-07-07 Thread Mikhail Antonov (JIRA)
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-11467: --- Summary: New impl of Registry interface not using ZK + new RPCs on master protocol. Key: HBASE-11467 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11467 Proj

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

2014-07-07 Thread Aditya
Sorry about that. Here is the umbrella JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1015 On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > Would you mind including the JIRA numbers along with the request? > > Thanks, > Nick > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Aditya wrote: > >> Do

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-11466) HConnectionImplementation should not use ZK

2014-07-07 Thread Mikhail Antonov (JIRA)
Mikhail Antonov created HBASE-11466: --- Summary: HConnectionImplementation should not use ZK Key: HBASE-11466 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11466 Project: HBase Issue Type:

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

2014-07-07 Thread Andrew Purtell
And by definition of that being a proposed design, there is no implementation to track (yet). There being no implementation, it's hard to see how it makes a 1.0 happening "soon". Don't misunderstand me to be opposed to the idea or feature, far from it. I don't think Ted did anyone a service br

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

2014-07-07 Thread Enis Söztutar
I think it is fair to say for both C API and transaction API that it should be ok to include them if they are ready before the time to cut the 1.0 RC. If not, I do not want to hold the release waiting for those. Enis On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > And by definition of

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

2014-07-07 Thread Mikhail Antonov
I thought the scope of HBASE-11447 is to review and refine proposed design, not to track the implementation of the feature? -Mikhail 2014-07-07 10:40 GMT-07:00 Andrew Purtell : > That is not a realistic proposal for 1.0 as far as I can see. There is > only a tentative design spec on that issue.

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

2014-07-07 Thread Andrew Purtell
That is not a realistic proposal for 1.0 as far as I can see. There is only a tentative design spec on that issue. I assume we are sticking with Enis' earlier stated intent to get 1.0 out "soon". > On Jul 7, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > > The following is another candidate for 1.0.0 re

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

2014-07-07 Thread Ted Yu
The following is another candidate for 1.0.0 release HBASE-11447 Proposal for a generic transaction API for HBase Cheers On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Aditya wrote: > Do we want to have the C APIs part of 1.0.0 release. I had posted few > patches and a set of review request sometime last we

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

2014-07-07 Thread Nick Dimiduk
Would you mind including the JIRA numbers along with the request? Thanks, Nick On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Aditya wrote: > Do we want to have the C APIs part of 1.0.0 release. I had posted few > patches and a set of review request sometime last week. > > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:21 AM, E

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

2014-07-07 Thread Andrew Purtell
Hi Aditya, I think it would be good to have a native client API in 1.0. I can look at the patches when back in the office later this week. > On Jul 7, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Aditya wrote: > > Do we want to have the C APIs part of 1.0.0 release. I had posted few > patches and a set of review reque

Re: DISCUSSION: 1.0.0

2014-07-07 Thread Aditya
Do we want to have the C APIs part of 1.0.0 release. I had posted few patches and a set of review request sometime last week. On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Mikhail Antonov > wrote: > > > Moved ZK watcher & listener subtask out of scope H